Zak Kent Again and Again

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

brock118
Forum User
Posts: 526
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:56 pm

Zak Kent Again and Again

Post by brock118 »

Claimed by Twins on waivers...guy is on a merry go round.
smilinjoefission
Forum User
Posts: 779
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:44 pm

Re: Zak Kent Again and Again

Post by smilinjoefission »

So they gave up Ramos to have Kent on the team for a couple of days? I mean if they like him that much how about not DFA'n him every time you get him.
RamFan08NY
Forum User
Posts: 1269
Joined: 24 May 2024 12:48 pm

Re: Zak Kent Again and Again

Post by RamFan08NY »

What an embarrassing fiasco.
Southern Illinois
Forum User
Posts: 29
Joined: 16 Jun 2024 13:58 pm

Re: Zak Kent Again and Again

Post by Southern Illinois »

RamFan08NY wrote: 26 Feb 2026 15:15 pm What an embarrassing fiasco.
How so? Just roster churn of spare parts that will serve zero meaningful purpose.
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 7856
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: Zak Kent Again and Again

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

Southern Illinois wrote: 26 Feb 2026 15:57 pm
RamFan08NY wrote: 26 Feb 2026 15:15 pm What an embarrassing fiasco.
How so? Just roster churn of spare parts that will serve zero meaningful purpose.
A lot of teams do this people are just used to Mo who once they’re on the roster they’re there so it seems strange when the cardinals do things like this that a lot of other teams do. The orioles picked up Ramos twice this off season several teams had Kent. It’s not hard to figure out they pick up a guy on waivers that they like then they see another guy they like more on waivers dump the first guy then sign someone they like more dump the second guy
RamFan08NY
Forum User
Posts: 1269
Joined: 24 May 2024 12:48 pm

Re: Zak Kent Again and Again

Post by RamFan08NY »

Southern Illinois wrote: 26 Feb 2026 15:57 pm
RamFan08NY wrote: 26 Feb 2026 15:15 pm What an embarrassing fiasco.
How so? Just roster churn of spare parts that will serve zero meaningful purpose.
Because, with Ramos, you had an Elite fielding 3b, who has shown "some" pop from the RH side at the ML level. Was he a guarantee? No, but he was a zero risk player to give a shot to for a team lacking RH hitting.
I'd rather that, than claiming a pitcher, and immediately designating him and exposing him to other teams
Jobu's Rum
Forum User
Posts: 691
Joined: 26 May 2024 10:10 am

Re: Zak Kent Again and Again

Post by Jobu's Rum »

RamFan08NY wrote: 26 Feb 2026 16:37 pm
Southern Illinois wrote: 26 Feb 2026 15:57 pm
RamFan08NY wrote: 26 Feb 2026 15:15 pm What an embarrassing fiasco.
How so? Just roster churn of spare parts that will serve zero meaningful purpose.
Because, with Ramos, you had an Elite fielding 3b, who has shown "some" pop from the RH side at the ML level. Was he a guarantee? No, but he was a zero risk player to give a shot to for a team lacking RH hitting.
I'd rather that, than claiming a pitcher, and immediately designating him and exposing him to other teams

Was Ramos a good fielder as well? I know he showed flashes of power. Makes the move even worse, he was only 23/24 too :x
cardstatman
Forum User
Posts: 3107
Joined: 23 May 2024 22:10 pm

Re: Zak Kent Again and Again

Post by cardstatman »

Kent vs Roycroft vs Ramos for last roster spots

There was room for 2 until we signed Urias.

Roycroft survived. He will be 29 in June and spent 2025 struggling in AAA.

I would have kept Ramos and let Roycroft go but I have little information about why they think differently.
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 7856
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: Zak Kent Again and Again

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

cardstatman wrote: 26 Feb 2026 18:37 pm Kent vs Roycroft vs Ramos for last roster spots

There was room for 2 until we signed Urias.

Roycroft survived. He will be 29 in June and spent 2025 struggling in AAA.

I would have kept Ramos and let Roycroft go but I have little information about why they think differently.
When they got Urias Ramos was no longer needed they were going to have to send him down and lose him on waivers anyway. Urias is a gold glove infielder who can play multiple positions and is a veteran who by all reports is a great influence on younger players. Ramos is a career .198 hitter in 119 career plate appearances and hit an awe inspiring .216 at AAA last season it was a fairly easy call. Oh he’s also 0-1 in spring training which if he did that for the cardinals some posters would be having a meltdown because he’s hitless
Jobu's Rum
Forum User
Posts: 691
Joined: 26 May 2024 10:10 am

Re: Zak Kent Again and Again

Post by Jobu's Rum »

Ozziesfan41 wrote: 26 Feb 2026 19:00 pm
cardstatman wrote: 26 Feb 2026 18:37 pm Kent vs Roycroft vs Ramos for last roster spots

There was room for 2 until we signed Urias.

Roycroft survived. He will be 29 in June and spent 2025 struggling in AAA.

I would have kept Ramos and let Roycroft go but I have little information about why they think differently.
When they got Urias Ramos was no longer needed they were going to have to send him down and lose him on waivers anyway. Urias is a gold glove infielder who can play multiple positions and is a veteran who by all reports is a great influence on younger players. Ramos is a career .198 hitter in 119 career plate appearances and hit an awe inspiring .216 at AAA last season it was a fairly easy call. Oh he’s also 0-1 in spring training which if he did that for the cardinals some posters would be having a meltdown because he’s hitless
They dropped Ramos before picking up Urias. And stating Ramos' career is disingenuous since he has only had a cup of coffee in the bigs and is only 23. Urias didnt even get to the bigs until he was 25/26 years old
Melville
Forum User
Posts: 5629
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:16 pm

Re: Zak Kent Again and Again

Post by Melville »

brock118 wrote: 26 Feb 2026 14:22 pm Claimed by Twins on waivers...guy is on a merry go round.
Changes clothes more often than Clark.
butsir01
Forum User
Posts: 1897
Joined: 23 May 2024 20:36 pm

Re: Zak Kent Again and Again

Post by butsir01 »

RamFan08NY wrote: 26 Feb 2026 16:37 pm
Southern Illinois wrote: 26 Feb 2026 15:57 pm
RamFan08NY wrote: 26 Feb 2026 15:15 pm What an embarrassing fiasco.
How so? Just roster churn of spare parts that will serve zero meaningful purpose.
Because, with Ramos, you had an Elite fielding 3b, who has shown "some" pop from the RH side at the ML level. Was he a guarantee? No, but he was a zero risk player to give a shot to for a team lacking RH hitting.
I'd rather that, than claiming a pitcher, and immediately designating him and exposing him to other teams
^^This.
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 7856
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: Zak Kent Again and Again

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

Jobu's Rum wrote: 26 Feb 2026 19:21 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 26 Feb 2026 19:00 pm
cardstatman wrote: 26 Feb 2026 18:37 pm Kent vs Roycroft vs Ramos for last roster spots

There was room for 2 until we signed Urias.

Roycroft survived. He will be 29 in June and spent 2025 struggling in AAA.

I would have kept Ramos and let Roycroft go but I have little information about why they think differently.
When they got Urias Ramos was no longer needed they were going to have to send him down and lose him on waivers anyway. Urias is a gold glove infielder who can play multiple positions and is a veteran who by all reports is a great influence on younger players. Ramos is a career .198 hitter in 119 career plate appearances and hit an awe inspiring .216 at AAA last season it was a fairly easy call. Oh he’s also 0-1 in spring training which if he did that for the cardinals some posters would be having a meltdown because he’s hitless
They dropped Ramos before picking up Urias. And stating Ramos' career is disingenuous since he has only had a cup of coffee in the bigs and is only 23. Urias didnt even get to the bigs until he was 25/26 years old
They were probably already negotiating with urias at the time they picked up ramos. Ramos sucks hes not going to make the orioles they will try to sneak him back through waivers and the cardinals and any other team will have another chance to pick him up. Ramos sucks so bad the whitesox didnt even think he worth keeping around. And so what if he’s young a young player who sucks still sucks
82birds
Forum User
Posts: 17768
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:17 pm

Re: Zak Kent Again and Again

Post by 82birds »

quite the couple of weeks for Kent, to say the least !
JuanAgosto
Forum User
Posts: 6693
Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm

Re: Zak Kent Again and Again

Post by JuanAgosto »

Maybe Bloom and Mo made a bet. Chaim said he could make Johnny boy look smart. Winner gets to keep Girsch.
Bushiro
Forum User
Posts: 1097
Joined: 07 Nov 2018 11:29 am

Re: Zak Kent Again and Again

Post by Bushiro »

Jobu's Rum wrote: 26 Feb 2026 17:04 pm
RamFan08NY wrote: 26 Feb 2026 16:37 pm
Southern Illinois wrote: 26 Feb 2026 15:57 pm
RamFan08NY wrote: 26 Feb 2026 15:15 pm What an embarrassing fiasco.
How so? Just roster churn of spare parts that will serve zero meaningful purpose.
Because, with Ramos, you had an Elite fielding 3b, who has shown "some" pop from the RH side at the ML level. Was he a guarantee? No, but he was a zero risk player to give a shot to for a team lacking RH hitting.
I'd rather that, than claiming a pitcher, and immediately designating him and exposing him to other teams

Was Ramos a good fielder as well? I know he showed flashes of power. Makes the move even worse, he was only 23/24 too :x
I think he was the number 3 prospect for the white sox at one time...I could be wrong but I thought I read that somewhere
Post Reply