Logan Mailloux
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
Re: Logan Mailloux
hahahaha
I go to hit and send and see the clown has woke up.
hahahaha
omg
He's at 14.44 FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY.
Now we have to watch clown guy crawl for who knows how long because.......he's never wrong.
https://www.choosingtherapy.com/male-narcissist/
I go to hit and send and see the clown has woke up.
hahahaha
omg
He's at 14.44 FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY.
Now we have to watch clown guy crawl for who knows how long because.......he's never wrong.
https://www.choosingtherapy.com/male-narcissist/
-
juan good eye
- Forum User
- Posts: 382
- Joined: 08 Oct 2025 23:31 pm
Re: Logan Mailloux
My fan perspective is hurry up and wait.SameOldBlues wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 16:49 pmGreat assessment, thanks for puttin in the work.dhsux wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 10:03 am Admittedly a fan and definitely try to follow his play as close as I can. I know he has his detractors here as well so I thought I'd ask how every one thinks he is working out.
Breaking his 49 games down on just +/- it goes...... first 13 games -12, next 14 games -8 and last 13 games -3 at 14.44 mpg.
For the 13 Jan games here's the D core comparison:
Faulk +2
Fowler -1
Broberg +2
CP -2
Tucker -1
Mailloux -3
Plus/minus is fallible and always debated but for me I've seen definite progress in his play that correlates very close to what these numbers say. Basically IMO the progress in his defensive play has correlated with these numbers and spells, IMO, good things to come.
His offense has been disappointing. OK...stat-wise bad. 1 assist in 13 games. 4 shots. It's very odd to me, I think he has a strong passing game, a good shot, he seems to make the right decisions and he's not fumbling the puck creating turnovers. He's not some problem in the Ozone. I am convinced he's deliberately playing a cautious nearly timid offensive game, overly focusing on his defensive responsibilities and pretty much to his offensive detriment. And further, I'm pretty sure he is doing this correctly for the now. I think his offensive skills are there for the taking once he gets settled in with more experience on both ends.
I do view Mailloux as a project but keep in mind with the way this team has played this year there's about a dozen other projects out there on the ice as well which has likely not helped him out too much.
Can't say for sure but for me, I'd put it 80/20 the Blues have their top 4 RHD guy they were looking for.
There’s not a doubt in my mind he’s progressing and is passin the eye test defensively, but Im also disappointed in his offense to date. But there’s also not a doubt in my mind that the coaches are actively havin him concentrate on his D exclusively almost. Like I keep saying, it’s all about the process.
You can see how good he skates, and you can see how hard he shoots, and you can see he gets it on net too, and you can see his passes are usually sharp, I still feel like itll all come together and he’ll be a nice physical Top 4 D by time he hits the magical 200 game mark.
Its been less than 50 games, and he’s made noticeable progress, to say otherwise is simply wrong. As much (bleep) as he’s been dealt simply for bein traded for some people’s fetishboy Bokduc who’s still a below 20 goal scorer a season, I hope he keeps improving and showin the impatient crowd he’ll be an asset in sue time.
Re: Logan Mailloux
7th rounder Tyler Tucker was getting more ice at Mails’ age.
-
Bubble4427
- Forum User
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm
Re: Logan Mailloux
Personally, I throw out the first 10 games of the season. You can’t really count them because Monty screwed up by pairing him with Tyler Tucker. It was a complete train wreck every time they were on the ice together. Normally, when you are grooming a green, young defenseman….you put him with a dependable veteran….not a 2nd year 6/7 defenseman. That did Mailloux no favors when it comes to his growth or his confidence.dhsux wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 17:56 pmThanks to all but one of you for the responses.SameOldBlues wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 16:49 pmGreat assessment, thanks for puttin in the work.dhsux wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 10:03 am Admittedly a fan and definitely try to follow his play as close as I can. I know he has his detractors here as well so I thought I'd ask how every one thinks he is working out.
Breaking his 49 games down on just +/- it goes...... first 13 games -12, next 14 games -8 and last 13 games -3 at 14.44 mpg.
For the 13 Jan games here's the D core comparison:
Faulk +2
Fowler -1
Broberg +2
CP -2
Tucker -1
Mailloux -3
Plus/minus is fallible and always debated but for me I've seen definite progress in his play that correlates very close to what these numbers say. Basically IMO the progress in his defensive play has correlated with these numbers and spells, IMO, good things to come.
His offense has been disappointing. OK...stat-wise bad. 1 assist in 13 games. 4 shots. It's very odd to me, I think he has a strong passing game, a good shot, he seems to make the right decisions and he's not fumbling the puck creating turnovers. He's not some problem in the Ozone. I am convinced he's deliberately playing a cautious nearly timid offensive game, overly focusing on his defensive responsibilities and pretty much to his offensive detriment. And further, I'm pretty sure he is doing this correctly for the now. I think his offensive skills are there for the taking once he gets settled in with more experience on both ends.
I do view Mailloux as a project but keep in mind with the way this team has played this year there's about a dozen other projects out there on the ice as well which has likely not helped him out too much.
Can't say for sure but for me, I'd put it 80/20 the Blues have their top 4 RHD guy they were looking for.
There’s not a doubt in my mind he’s progressing and is passin the eye test defensively, but Im also disappointed in his offense to date. But there’s also not a doubt in my mind that the coaches are actively havin him concentrate on his D exclusively almost. Like I keep saying, it’s all about the process.
You can see how good he skates, and you can see how hard he shoots, and you can see he gets it on net too, and you can see his passes are usually sharp, I still feel like itll all come together and he’ll be a nice physical Top 4 D by time he hits the magical 200 game mark.
Its been less than 50 games, and he’s made noticeable progress, to say otherwise is simply wrong. As much (bleep) as he’s been dealt simply for bein traded for some people’s fetishboy Bokduc who’s still a below 20 goal scorer a season, I hope he keeps improving and showin the impatient crowd he’ll be an asset in sue time.
I'm pleased with most all of the responses here aside from the usual de-railer who turns everything into his effed up jumbled up totally confused anti DA agenda. He started off ok but then immediately just gave in to his lesser angel.
I'm wide open to the few comments doubting this player, that's fair game.
But the 13 games played in January he is, by the +/- evaluation anyway, hanging with peers who have tons of years and hundreds of games under their belt,on a losing team, indeed says something.
My feeling is the experience factor will come for this kid, and something will pop, and these kinds of threads will be fun to look back upon.
A few of the positive criticisms have been great. More asserting physical play, more punishing body. Mean streak. Join the rush more.
Thanks all.
Anyone who knows hockey should be willing to wait 200 games to pass judgement on how good he will be. The guys who are grading him on his ice time in his 50th game are just plain dumb.
Last edited by Bubble4427 on 01 Feb 2026 19:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Bubble4427
- Forum User
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm
-
the miracle
- Forum User
- Posts: 341
- Joined: 24 May 2024 12:14 pm
Re: Logan Mailloux
What is the OG Race? I’m not sure, so do tell
-
SweeneyAstray
- Forum User
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 24 Jan 2026 10:48 am
Re: Logan Mailloux
A clandestine group of banned screen names, masking a half-wit whose “humor” and hobbies seem to include hours spent on Google images gathering half-naked and tongue pics of hockey players to post on a hockey forum. Oh - he actually denied he does this, but then doubles down in the following days by posting more and more pics from his collection.
-
Sunny's Teeth
- Forum User
- Posts: 805
- Joined: 30 May 2019 18:45 pm
Re: Logan Mailloux
And an admitted racist to boot. Piece of work that one.BudOnTap wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 20:56 pmA clandestine group of banned screen names, masking a half-wit whose “humor” and hobbies seem to include hours spent on Google images gathering half-naked and tongue pics of hockey players to post on a hockey forum. Oh - he actually denied he does this, but then doubles down in the following days by posting more and more pics from his collection.
Re: Logan Mailloux
I’m Theo grace. What is an OG race dingus? Your handle publicly mocks the teeth/looks of a man on the team you cheer for. Brilliant.Sunny's Teeth wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 20:59 pmAnd an admitted racist to boot. Piece of work that one.BudOnTap wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 20:56 pmA clandestine group of banned screen names, masking a half-wit whose “humor” and hobbies seem to include hours spent on Google images gathering half-naked and tongue pics of hockey players to post on a hockey forum. Oh - he actually denied he does this, but then doubles down in the following days by posting more and more pics from his collection.
Careful you don’t get timed out … again
Re: Logan Mailloux
Really? I am surprised to hear that.Sunny's Teeth wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 20:59 pmAnd an admitted racist to boot. Piece of work that one.BudOnTap wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 20:56 pmA clandestine group of banned screen names, masking a half-wit whose “humor” and hobbies seem to include hours spent on Google images gathering half-naked and tongue pics of hockey players to post on a hockey forum. Oh - he actually denied he does this, but then doubles down in the following days by posting more and more pics from his collection.
-
Sunny's Teeth
- Forum User
- Posts: 805
- Joined: 30 May 2019 18:45 pm
Re: Logan Mailloux
Yeah, he made some pretty ugly comments about Kadri's heritage back in the day, and, surprisingly, owned them. (shrug)BudOnTap wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 21:26 pmReally? I am surprised to hear that.Sunny's Teeth wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 20:59 pmAnd an admitted racist to boot. Piece of work that one.BudOnTap wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 20:56 pmA clandestine group of banned screen names, masking a half-wit whose “humor” and hobbies seem to include hours spent on Google images gathering half-naked and tongue pics of hockey players to post on a hockey forum. Oh - he actually denied he does this, but then doubles down in the following days by posting more and more pics from his collection.
Re: Logan Mailloux
Lol I love Kadri.Sunny's Teeth wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 21:30 pm Yeah, he made some pretty ugly comments about Kadri's heritage back in the day, and, surprisingly, owned them. (shrug)
Passive aggressive liar
Laughing
Re: Logan Mailloux
Well, he keeps coming back with new screen names after he’s been banned more than once and he somehow decided to flat out deny he ever posted multiple half-naked and tongue wagging pics of young hockey players on this very forum as if people don’t remember. I guess I believe anything about such an individual.Sunny's Teeth wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 21:30 pmYeah, he made some pretty ugly comments about Kadri's heritage back in the day, and, surprisingly, owned them. (shrug)BudOnTap wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 21:26 pmReally? I am surprised to hear that.Sunny's Teeth wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 20:59 pmAnd an admitted racist to boot. Piece of work that one.BudOnTap wrote: ↑01 Feb 2026 20:56 pmA clandestine group of banned screen names, masking a half-wit whose “humor” and hobbies seem to include hours spent on Google images gathering half-naked and tongue pics of hockey players to post on a hockey forum. Oh - he actually denied he does this, but then doubles down in the following days by posting more and more pics from his collection.
