New Ownership
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
New Ownership
If you really think about, the fans didn't target Donovan or Sonny or Burly last year. They targeted the current ownership and Mo by staying away from the stadium. The mostly savvy fans of the long standing Cardinals didn't like the product assembled by ownership and decided to save their money and time. And I suspect they will continue to as salary dumps and trading away core players last July says it all. If the owners don't care, neither do the fans.
-
CorneliusWolfe
- Forum User
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: 02 May 2025 19:12 pm
Re: New Ownership
I wouldn’t say they don’t care because Bloom was name-hire with a track record. I’m sure promoting Girsch would’ve been much cheaper.Pura Vida wrote: ↑12 Jan 2026 13:35 pm If you really think about, the fans didn't target Donovan or Sonny or Burly last year. They targeted the current ownership and Mo by staying away from the stadium. The mostly savvy fans of the long standing Cardinals didn't like the product assembled by ownership and decided to save their money and time. And I suspect they will continue to as salary dumps and trading away core players last July says it all. If the owners don't care, neither do the fans.
I do agree that the fans rebelled more again management than the team. And if they build a winner again the fans will return. Everybody loves a winner.
Blaming the fans on the payroll was lame too. The franchise value increased exponentially from when BDW bought the team. Fans had a lot to do with that too.
Re: New Ownership
Just to clarify, I think the signing of Bloom is a major factor for selling the team. As you said, a name hire. I think it's obvious, the absence of fans reflects directly on the current ownership and not the players. Even the great Ohtani wasn't enough to catapult the Angels to the WS.CorneliusWolfe wrote: ↑12 Jan 2026 13:41 pmI wouldn’t say they don’t care because Bloom was name-hire with a track record. I’m sure promoting Girsch would’ve been much cheaper.Pura Vida wrote: ↑12 Jan 2026 13:35 pm If you really think about, the fans didn't target Donovan or Sonny or Burly last year. They targeted the current ownership and Mo by staying away from the stadium. The mostly savvy fans of the long standing Cardinals didn't like the product assembled by ownership and decided to save their money and time. And I suspect they will continue to as salary dumps and trading away core players last July says it all. If the owners don't care, neither do the fans.
I do agree that the fans rebelled more again management than the team. And if they build a winner again the fans will return. Everybody loves a winner.
Blaming the fans on the payroll was lame too. The franchise value increased exponentially from when BDW bought the team. Fans had a lot to do with that too.
-
AnExParrot
- Forum User
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: 02 Jan 2020 19:58 pm
Re: New Ownership
Many think the team is such a cash cow that DeWitt has to be greedy/cheap to not spend more on team payroll. Assuming they're right, why would he ever sell the team?
-
Jeff Goldblum
- Forum User
- Posts: 456
- Joined: 05 Dec 2025 15:43 pm
Re: New Ownership
When he said that about reducing payroll if the fans dont support his garbage product, he lost me. Maybe I'll care about them again some day.CorneliusWolfe wrote: ↑12 Jan 2026 13:41 pmI wouldn’t say they don’t care because Bloom was name-hire with a track record. I’m sure promoting Girsch would’ve been much cheaper.Pura Vida wrote: ↑12 Jan 2026 13:35 pm If you really think about, the fans didn't target Donovan or Sonny or Burly last year. They targeted the current ownership and Mo by staying away from the stadium. The mostly savvy fans of the long standing Cardinals didn't like the product assembled by ownership and decided to save their money and time. And I suspect they will continue to as salary dumps and trading away core players last July says it all. If the owners don't care, neither do the fans.
I do agree that the fans rebelled more again management than the team. And if they build a winner again the fans will return. Everybody loves a winner.
Blaming the fans on the payroll was lame too. The franchise value increased exponentially from when BDW bought the team. Fans had a lot to do with that too.
Re: New Ownership
Assuming you're right and the team constantly loses or breaks even, why would a billionaire want it? See, the knife cuts both ways. One thing is for sure. They could spend more on payroll. They won't. Why? Who knows. But they came up with this lame excuse, a "rebuild" which basically means they're going to tank. The fans be damned. It wasn't that long ago they drew 3 million fans and put a competent product on the field and fans will come out to see it. With this economy they may not come out at the 3 million clip, but some will let their grocery bill "tank" just to go out to the stadium and watch an exciting team.AnExParrot wrote: ↑12 Jan 2026 15:40 pm Many think the team is such a cash cow that DeWitt has to be greedy/cheap to not spend more on team payroll. Assuming they're right, why would he ever sell the team?
-
CorneliusWolfe
- Forum User
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: 02 May 2025 19:12 pm
Re: New Ownership
Yeah, I’m not sure I buy into the secret sell narrative. Why would Bloom agree to being part of such a ruse? There’s no guarantee he would even be retained. I can’t see a deal hinging on some weird stipulation where the new owner has to keep the POBO.AnExParrot wrote: ↑12 Jan 2026 15:40 pm Many think the team is such a cash cow that DeWitt has to be greedy/cheap to not spend more on team payroll. Assuming they're right, why would he ever sell the team?
Bloom could’ve just taken a position with another team under normal circumstance. And if BDW truly wanted to sell, he could have paid someone else a lot less to do a tear-down.
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1719
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: New Ownership
Unlikely the team will be sold. DeWitt III appears to have taken over and it appears with his business degree he likes it.
Gussie's kids just wanted to cash out.
Gussie's kids just wanted to cash out.
-
AnExParrot
- Forum User
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: 02 Jan 2020 19:58 pm
Re: New Ownership
I don't believe they constantly lose/break even, and I've never said that - why just make [shirt] up?CCard wrote: ↑12 Jan 2026 17:32 pmAssuming you're right and the team constantly loses or breaks even, why would a billionaire want it? See, the knife cuts both ways. One thing is for sure. They could spend more on payroll. They won't. Why? Who knows. But they came up with this lame excuse, a "rebuild" which basically means they're going to tank. The fans be damned. It wasn't that long ago they drew 3 million fans and put a competent product on the field and fans will come out to see it. With this economy they may not come out at the 3 million clip, but some will let their grocery bill "tank" just to go out to the stadium and watch an exciting team.AnExParrot wrote: ↑12 Jan 2026 15:40 pm Many think the team is such a cash cow that DeWitt has to be greedy/cheap to not spend more on team payroll. Assuming they're right, why would he ever sell the team?
I believe the Forbes data(recently discussed in-depth), and the 10 year average of ~27 mil does not fit my definition of "cash cow" as far as professional sports franchises go, particularly and especially since there are many investors in the St. Louis Cardinals LLC, not just a single owner.
Re: New Ownership
I see your points but I would not call it a ruse. It's simply a business strategy to add value to the team with an experienced VP/GM. A buyer purchases all, including management.CorneliusWolfe wrote: ↑12 Jan 2026 17:56 pmYeah, I’m not sure I buy into the secret sell narrative. Why would Bloom agree to being part of such a ruse? There’s no guarantee he would even be retained. I can’t see a deal hinging on some weird stipulation where the new owner has to keep the POBO.AnExParrot wrote: ↑12 Jan 2026 15:40 pm Many think the team is such a cash cow that DeWitt has to be greedy/cheap to not spend more on team payroll. Assuming they're right, why would he ever sell the team?
Bloom could’ve just taken a position with another team under normal circumstance. And if BDW truly wanted to sell, he could have paid someone else a lot less to do a tear-down.
Nothing is forever including ownership... Bill DeWitt Jr. and his family have owned the St. Louis Cardinals since purchasing the team from Anheuser-Busch in 1995 (for the 1995 season), with the deal closing in 1996,
-
CorneliusWolfe
- Forum User
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: 02 May 2025 19:12 pm
Re: New Ownership
Bloom has a good reputation but I doubt he’s good enough to be a tipping in a sale in the billions. I mean, how much different would the price be without him? The lower payroll would definitely be a factor.Pura Vida wrote: ↑12 Jan 2026 18:11 pmI see your points but I would not call it a ruse. It's simply a business strategy to add value to the team with an experienced VP/GM. A buyer purchases all, including management.CorneliusWolfe wrote: ↑12 Jan 2026 17:56 pmYeah, I’m not sure I buy into the secret sell narrative. Why would Bloom agree to being part of such a ruse? There’s no guarantee he would even be retained. I can’t see a deal hinging on some weird stipulation where the new owner has to keep the POBO.AnExParrot wrote: ↑12 Jan 2026 15:40 pm Many think the team is such a cash cow that DeWitt has to be greedy/cheap to not spend more on team payroll. Assuming they're right, why would he ever sell the team?
Bloom could’ve just taken a position with another team under normal circumstance. And if BDW truly wanted to sell, he could have paid someone else a lot less to do a tear-down.
Nothing is forever including ownership... Bill DeWitt Jr. and his family have owned the St. Louis Cardinals since purchasing the team from Anheuser-Busch in 1995 (for the 1995 season), with the deal closing in 1996,
I’m not arguing your point that they could be considering selling though. The old adage “everything is for sale” definitely applies.