Canada vs the czechs thread

[DawgDad]

Czech's can play.

[Aesa]

Czech's can play.

They dominated the first 16 minutes, imho Gave Canada all they could handle.

[theograce]

Canada had the better chances…couple posts too.

Great gap by the Czechs though.

That penalty was a joke at the end

[aroos]

No way Canada outplayed the Czechs. The Czech forecheck was dominant.

Jiricek looks great. He was featured in the pre-game by TSN and was praised again in the intermission discussion. He’s a really exciting prospect.

[Aesa]

No way Canada outplayed the Czechs. The Czech forecheck was dominant.

Jiricek looks great. He was featured in the pre-game by TSN and was praised again in the intermission discussion. He’s a really exciting prospect.

Correct. IYKYK

[Aesa]

2-1 Czechzia

[Pierre McGuire]

Hage is gonna be a great player.

[Bluesfan1978]

Jiricek doesn’t look as sharp this game. Maybe is still not feeling well?

[MiamiLaw]

It’s incredible how good these kids are. Love this tourney every year

[diehardbluesfan1]

Voerhoff vs galvis discuss

Gal is has impressed me more and he’s much more noticeable

[Pierre McGuire]

Voerhoff vs galvis discuss

Gal is has impressed me more and he’s much more noticeable

And already passed over twice in the draft. Have to think somebody is gonna call his name in June though.

[Aesa]

2-1 Czechzia

Make that 3-2

[BalotelliMassive]

I want Czechia to win based on them having the best casting videos in the business.

[a smell of green grass]

Voerhoff vs galvis discuss

Gal is has impressed me more and he’s much more noticeable

Here are my thoughts.

Galvas is a very good puck-mover, but a bit small. He has very good hockey IQ as well, and good vision.

I really like Voerhoff's game, but I don't foresee big offensive impact from him. He's not an elite puck-mover. Based on what I saw in this tourney, I'd love to have him, but not as a TOP5 pick.

I'm very curious to know what others see in Voerhoff.

[Pierre McGuire]

Voerhoff vs galvis discuss

Gal is has impressed me more and he’s much more noticeable

Here are my thoughts.

Galvas is a very good puck-mover, but a bit small. He has very good hockey IQ as well, and good vision.

I really like Voerhoff's game, but I don't foresee big offensive impact from him. He's not an elite puck-mover. Based on what I saw in this tourney, I'd love to have him, but not as a TOP5 pick.

I'm very curious to know what others see in Voerhoff.

I’ll take Carels all day long over Verhoeff

[MiamiLaw]

What a goal