Contreras to Red Sox

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Post Reply
82birds
Forum User
Posts: 17023
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:17 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by 82birds »

thx for the link Absolut
kyace
Forum User
Posts: 930
Joined: 24 May 2024 19:11 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by kyace »

Cardinals got a young controlled MAJOR LEAGUE starter just as good or better than what they have now. Some people want to trade Donovan straight up for a similar pitcher in Cameron. Contreras had little surplus value even after what the Cards are sending back. To get the additional pitchers back is a bonus.
Take a look at what pitchers are getting in free agency now.
Hoosier59
Forum User
Posts: 1257
Joined: 16 Dec 2022 12:03 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by Hoosier59 »

craviduce wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:17 pm
2ninr wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:10 pm
Carp4Cy wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:58 pm
2ninr wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:49 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:30 pm
Hoosier59 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:23 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:21 pm
No-Mo-Mo wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:19 pm This is all they can get for Contreras? Lolol
What did you think they were going to get for him lol
Mo could have gotten more than this!
Mo would have kept him got nothing for him and the cardinals would have still missed the playoffs the next two years with him then he would have left with nothing to show in return
^^^^^^^.
Thanks Oz. This really is the truth.
That’s always the excuse for salary dumps. We could have competed in 2027 if Bill was willing to try.
As it is we are getting back long shots and non needle moving role players. Filler and the dreaded innings eaters.
I understand. I really do. People want to win. But this roster that was put together is incapable of it with the amount of money they would need to spend to make it competitive vs the amount of money they actually have to spend plus the big contracts they already had. They are rebuilding. Hopefully it is a short one.
I think the "GO Point" will be when the Rotation becomes strong. We're gathering assets by the bunches right now. And AAA is looking mighty juicy with pitching talent in 2026. Springfield, too, will have the Likes of Doyle and maybe Clarke.

Let's assume for the sake of this exercise we're keeping Libby and McGreevy as future cogs in the rotation....we would need 3 of the following to make it to the BIGs and succeed enough to cement a place in the rotation : Henderson, Mathews, Doyle, Mautz, Clarke, Franklin....3 of the 6. And still having the "next men up" in Memphis.

From there, you can starting trading your piled up assets in Springfield/Peoria for offensive MLB gems for your lineup. I love the potential Wetherholt, but he's not going to be able to do it on his own.

All eyes are on the Pitching prospects, imo....or that's where our eyes should be.
Crav, how many LHPs starters do you really think is prudent, or that they’re likely to go with? In all honesty, I could see our top 5 starters all being left handed. I’m not sure I see that as a problem, other than, I think, lefties are more productive simply because batters see less of them. If the Cardinals have all left handed starters, does actually make them less effective?
Mort Gage
Forum User
Posts: 2348
Joined: 31 May 2023 13:27 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by Mort Gage »

FWIW this CBS columnist gave both teams an A:

https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/will ... cardinals/
craviduce
Forum User
Posts: 24366
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by craviduce »

Hoosier59 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:26 pm
craviduce wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:17 pm
2ninr wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:10 pm
Carp4Cy wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:58 pm
2ninr wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:49 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:30 pm
Hoosier59 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:23 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:21 pm
No-Mo-Mo wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:19 pm This is all they can get for Contreras? Lolol
What did you think they were going to get for him lol
Mo could have gotten more than this!
Mo would have kept him got nothing for him and the cardinals would have still missed the playoffs the next two years with him then he would have left with nothing to show in return
^^^^^^^.
Thanks Oz. This really is the truth.
That’s always the excuse for salary dumps. We could have competed in 2027 if Bill was willing to try.
As it is we are getting back long shots and non needle moving role players. Filler and the dreaded innings eaters.
I understand. I really do. People want to win. But this roster that was put together is incapable of it with the amount of money they would need to spend to make it competitive vs the amount of money they actually have to spend plus the big contracts they already had. They are rebuilding. Hopefully it is a short one.
I think the "GO Point" will be when the Rotation becomes strong. We're gathering assets by the bunches right now. And AAA is looking mighty juicy with pitching talent in 2026. Springfield, too, will have the Likes of Doyle and maybe Clarke.

Let's assume for the sake of this exercise we're keeping Libby and McGreevy as future cogs in the rotation....we would need 3 of the following to make it to the BIGs and succeed enough to cement a place in the rotation : Henderson, Mathews, Doyle, Mautz, Clarke, Franklin....3 of the 6. And still having the "next men up" in Memphis.

From there, you can starting trading your piled up assets in Springfield/Peoria for offensive MLB gems for your lineup. I love the potential Wetherholt, but he's not going to be able to do it on his own.

All eyes are on the Pitching prospects, imo....or that's where our eyes should be.
Crav, how many LHPs starters do you really think is prudent, or that they’re likely to go with? In all honesty, I could see our top 5 starters all being left handed. I’m not sure I see that as a problem, other than, I think, lefties are more productive simply because batters see less of them. If the Cardinals have all left handed starters, does actually make them less effective?
I've had to reexamine "Prudent" recently. That's a great question. We have the Depth....just need to hold on to it for a season or two.

And, honestly, I think McGreevy is a mainstain. He's a workhorse, he has never been hurt. He's going to give you 3.5-4.5 ERA every season and consume at least 170 IP....that means we'll have 4 LHP :lol: :lol: That's still a bit much, yeah?

I think we'll see some interesting trades in the 2027 offseason....trade from our depth. And who knows, Franklin might just come on strong in 2026 in the minors. Our RHP needs him to come on strong.
Hoosier59
Forum User
Posts: 1257
Joined: 16 Dec 2022 12:03 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by Hoosier59 »

kyace wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:25 pm Cardinals got a young controlled MAJOR LEAGUE starter just as good or better than what they have now. Some people want to trade Donovan straight up for a similar pitcher in Cameron. Contreras had little surplus value even after what the Cards are sending back. To get the additional pitchers back is a bonus.
Take a look at what pitchers are getting in free agency now.
I get it Kyace. There were just some other players I was looking at from Boston that I coveted. I didn’t figure Contreras would get them by himself, but with a couple of other players added, that might have made the difference. Dobbins wasn’t even on my radar. His two ACL tears is troubling, however maybe the other two guys pan out. That won’t be for 3 or 4 years however.
2ninr
Forum User
Posts: 1023
Joined: 24 May 2024 15:04 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by 2ninr »

craviduce wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:17 pm
2ninr wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:10 pm
Carp4Cy wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:58 pm
2ninr wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:49 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:30 pm
Hoosier59 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:23 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:21 pm
No-Mo-Mo wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:19 pm This is all they can get for Contreras? Lolol
What did you think they were going to get for him lol
Mo could have gotten more than this!
Mo would have kept him got nothing for him and the cardinals would have still missed the playoffs the next two years with him then he would have left with nothing to show in return
^^^^^^^.
Thanks Oz. This really is the truth.
That’s always the excuse for salary dumps. We could have competed in 2027 if Bill was willing to try.
As it is we are getting back long shots and non needle moving role players. Filler and the dreaded innings eaters.
I understand. I really do. People want to win. But this roster that was put together is incapable of it with the amount of money they would need to spend to make it competitive vs the amount of money they actually have to spend plus the big contracts they already had. They are rebuilding. Hopefully it is a short one.
I think the "GO Point" will be when the Rotation becomes strong. We're gathering assets by the bunches right now. And AAA is looking mighty juicy with pitching talent in 2026. Springfield, too, will have the Likes of Doyle and maybe Clarke.

Let's assume for the sake of this exercise we're keeping Libby and McGreevy as future cogs in the rotation....we would need 3 of the following to make it to the BIGs and succeed enough to cement a place in the rotation : Henderson, Mathews, Doyle, Mautz, Clarke, Franklin....3 of the 6. And still having the "next men up" in Memphis.

From there, you can starting trading your piled up assets in Springfield/Peoria for offensive MLB gems for your lineup. I love the potential Wetherholt, but he's not going to be able to do it on his own.

All eyes are on the Pitching prospects, imo....or that's where our eyes should be.
Agree completely. Once they get the pitching pipeline settled in, the rest is a much easier chore. I personally think our minor league system will be loaded by the beginning of 2026 season. People need to realize pitching is the most valuable asset there is outside of your superstar stars, Soto, Judge, Ohtani. Im exited, and I think the doubters will be on board shortly.
Dazepster
Forum User
Posts: 874
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by Dazepster »

Though I hate seeing Bill have to send money I do like the potential of the return.
billybaseball
Forum User
Posts: 410
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:22 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by billybaseball »

Aita is an interesting pitcher too. Usually pitchers with his spin rates miss more bats. If increased velocity and better handle of his pitches lead to more swing and miss he could be a hugher upside arm than people are expecting
scoutyjones2
Forum User
Posts: 8803
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by scoutyjones2 »

BleedingBleu wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:21 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:00 pm So Bloom gets what? A (C) for this trade?

This is a nothing move
Considering Mo failed his one goal in the 2024/5 offseason; which was to trade Arenado. This is at least a C, because no one will be contributing to the Major League club for possibly 2 years
Yawn
Like anything that has transpired, will be contributing :roll:
BleedingBleu
Forum User
Posts: 129
Joined: 30 Nov 2025 07:19 am

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by BleedingBleu »

scoutyjones2 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:34 pm
BleedingBleu wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:21 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:00 pm So Bloom gets what? A (C) for this trade?

This is a nothing move
Considering Mo failed his one goal in the 2024/5 offseason; which was to trade Arenado. This is at least a C, because no one will be contributing to the Major League club for possibly 2 years
Yawn
Like anything that has transpired, will be contributing :roll:
I agree. However, you could argue Contreras may not contribute, either. He could get injured in Spring Training and never step on the field for the Red Sox for 2026, then the Owners lock out the players for all 2027.

I think you have to at least evaluate it from the perspective they received three potential pitchers including one that did pitch in the majors as recently as July; which improves the odds they contribute at some point.
Hoosier59
Forum User
Posts: 1257
Joined: 16 Dec 2022 12:03 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by Hoosier59 »

craviduce wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:30 pm
Hoosier59 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:26 pm
craviduce wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:17 pm
2ninr wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:10 pm
Carp4Cy wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:58 pm
2ninr wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:49 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:30 pm
Hoosier59 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:23 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:21 pm
No-Mo-Mo wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:19 pm This is all they can get for Contreras? Lolol
What did you think they were going to get for him lol
Mo could have gotten more than this!
Mo would have kept him got nothing for him and the cardinals would have still missed the playoffs the next two years with him then he would have left with nothing to show in return
^^^^^^^.
Thanks Oz. This really is the truth.
That’s always the excuse for salary dumps. We could have competed in 2027 if Bill was willing to try.
As it is we are getting back long shots and non needle moving role players. Filler and the dreaded innings eaters.
I understand. I really do. People want to win. But this roster that was put together is incapable of it with the amount of money they would need to spend to make it competitive vs the amount of money they actually have to spend plus the big contracts they already had. They are rebuilding. Hopefully it is a short one.
I think the "GO Point" will be when the Rotation becomes strong. We're gathering assets by the bunches right now. And AAA is looking mighty juicy with pitching talent in 2026. Springfield, too, will have the Likes of Doyle and maybe Clarke.

Let's assume for the sake of this exercise we're keeping Libby and McGreevy as future cogs in the rotation....we would need 3 of the following to make it to the BIGs and succeed enough to cement a place in the rotation : Henderson, Mathews, Doyle, Mautz, Clarke, Franklin....3 of the 6. And still having the "next men up" in Memphis.

From there, you can starting trading your piled up assets in Springfield/Peoria for offensive MLB gems for your lineup. I love the potential Wetherholt, but he's not going to be able to do it on his own.

All eyes are on the Pitching prospects, imo....or that's where our eyes should be.
Crav, how many LHPs starters do you really think is prudent, or that they’re likely to go with? In all honesty, I could see our top 5 starters all being left handed. I’m not sure I see that as a problem, other than, I think, lefties are more productive simply because batters see less of them. If the Cardinals have all left handed starters, does actually make them less effective?
I've had to reexamine "Prudent" recently. That's a great question. We have the Depth....just need to hold on to it for a season or two.

And, honestly, I think McGreevy is a mainstain. He's a workhorse, he has never been hurt. He's going to give you 3.5-4.5 ERA every season and consume at least 170 IP....that means we'll have 4 LHP :lol: :lol: That's still a bit much, yeah?

I think we'll see some interesting trades in the 2027 offseason....trade from our depth. And who knows, Franklin might just come on strong in 2026 in the minors. Our RHP needs him to come on strong.
I like McGreevy, hopefully he will keep improving. The problem is I also really like Henderson, Mautz, Doyle, Matthews, and Hansen.
I know you aren’t as high on Hansen, and I don’t think his ceiling is as high either, but he pitches different than the others do, and that might help him as time goes on.
Because of these guys that we already have, is kind of why I don’t like the Contreras trade. The two young guys are ok, but I was hoping for a bat in place of Dobbins. Dobbins might be needed in 2026, if he’s healthy, but what then if all these lefties are ready.
stlbirdlover
Forum User
Posts: 647
Joined: 24 May 2024 19:53 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by stlbirdlover »

Midrange Jay wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:01 pm Got to get that payroll back below $30 million, with the May signing.
I hope the attendance goes below 2 mil. :lol: :lol: :lol:
JuanAgosto
Forum User
Posts: 6436
Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by JuanAgosto »

BleedingBleu wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:21 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:00 pm So Bloom gets what? A (C) for this trade?

This is a nothing move
Considering Mo failed his one goal in the 2024/5 offseason; which was to trade Arenado. This is at least a C, because no one will be contributing to the Major League club for possibly 2 years
Mo failed at everything except being a pompous blowhard. At least Bloom is making moves. This is the time of year that Mo proclaimed he "liked what he had". Then he would lock himself away and sip wine coolers and watch Lifetime Network movies with Girsch. What a putz.
juan good eye
Forum User
Posts: 226
Joined: 08 Oct 2025 23:31 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by juan good eye »

Would’ve preferred more quality over quantity but glad to see another general move in the right direction and the official end to the WC era.
craviduce
Forum User
Posts: 24366
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by craviduce »

Hoosier59 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:41 pm
craviduce wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:30 pm
Hoosier59 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:26 pm
craviduce wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:17 pm
2ninr wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:10 pm
Carp4Cy wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:58 pm
2ninr wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:49 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:30 pm
Hoosier59 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:23 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:21 pm
No-Mo-Mo wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:19 pm This is all they can get for Contreras? Lolol
What did you think they were going to get for him lol
Mo could have gotten more than this!
Mo would have kept him got nothing for him and the cardinals would have still missed the playoffs the next two years with him then he would have left with nothing to show in return
^^^^^^^.
Thanks Oz. This really is the truth.
That’s always the excuse for salary dumps. We could have competed in 2027 if Bill was willing to try.
As it is we are getting back long shots and non needle moving role players. Filler and the dreaded innings eaters.
I understand. I really do. People want to win. But this roster that was put together is incapable of it with the amount of money they would need to spend to make it competitive vs the amount of money they actually have to spend plus the big contracts they already had. They are rebuilding. Hopefully it is a short one.
I think the "GO Point" will be when the Rotation becomes strong. We're gathering assets by the bunches right now. And AAA is looking mighty juicy with pitching talent in 2026. Springfield, too, will have the Likes of Doyle and maybe Clarke.

Let's assume for the sake of this exercise we're keeping Libby and McGreevy as future cogs in the rotation....we would need 3 of the following to make it to the BIGs and succeed enough to cement a place in the rotation : Henderson, Mathews, Doyle, Mautz, Clarke, Franklin....3 of the 6. And still having the "next men up" in Memphis.

From there, you can starting trading your piled up assets in Springfield/Peoria for offensive MLB gems for your lineup. I love the potential Wetherholt, but he's not going to be able to do it on his own.

All eyes are on the Pitching prospects, imo....or that's where our eyes should be.
Crav, how many LHPs starters do you really think is prudent, or that they’re likely to go with? In all honesty, I could see our top 5 starters all being left handed. I’m not sure I see that as a problem, other than, I think, lefties are more productive simply because batters see less of them. If the Cardinals have all left handed starters, does actually make them less effective?
I've had to reexamine "Prudent" recently. That's a great question. We have the Depth....just need to hold on to it for a season or two.

And, honestly, I think McGreevy is a mainstain. He's a workhorse, he has never been hurt. He's going to give you 3.5-4.5 ERA every season and consume at least 170 IP....that means we'll have 4 LHP :lol: :lol: That's still a bit much, yeah?

I think we'll see some interesting trades in the 2027 offseason....trade from our depth. And who knows, Franklin might just come on strong in 2026 in the minors. Our RHP needs him to come on strong.
I like McGreevy, hopefully he will keep improving. The problem is I also really like Henderson, Mautz, Doyle, Matthews, and Hansen.
I know you aren’t as high on Hansen, and I don’t think his ceiling is as high either, but he pitches different than the others do, and that might help him as time goes on.
Because of these guys that we already have, is kind of why I don’t like the Contreras trade. The two young guys are ok, but I was hoping for a bat in place of Dobbins. Dobbins might be needed in 2026, if he’s healthy, but what then if all these lefties are ready.
If all the LHP prospects are "ready" by 2027, then we'll likely trade from that depth. I don't think they'll all be ready, though. We only need 3 of them to be "ready". I think Mautz will initially struggle with AAA hitting. Too many good players at that level, including veterans trying to get back into the Majors. He has some history giving up the long ball, I think he'll initially struggle there. Henderson, imo, will likely have a high 3 to low 4 ERA, but that's not a bad thing....again, better hitters in AAA. We, thankfully have quite a bit of MLB depth for the 2026 rotation, so the kids in Memphis can stay there and develop, no pressure on them to succeed early on...I do hope 1 or 2 of them, especially Mathews, is lights out in April and May.
Post Reply