Zizzle1297 wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 07:33 am
I hopefully that the Fabbri and Berggren pick ups work out better than say Vrana. It definitely always us to move Schenn and another forward.
a smell of green grass wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 08:11 am
Army has used Offer Sheets to bring in young prospects better than we have. (Holloway, Broberg)
Army has used Trades to find a young defensive prospect better than we have. (Mailloux)
Isn't it amazing how good GM moves can can look when your roster sucks? Army finds talent because he must. He can't find any on his own via the NHL draft.
Now with Berggren, will Army do it a 3rd way? Will he find one of the team's best player off waivers?
Before you applaud Army, please consider that the players may be be the best on our team, but they were all NON-STARTERS on other rosters. With each move, Army is covering up his mistakes, not building a Stanley Cup roster.
Are you saying Mailloux is better than the defensive prospects we have?
If so, then we are in much bigger trouble than I thought.
You’re such a redundant transparent frown clown. I bet it chafes your Vajazzle that Mailloux has started showing promise and has been playin well for weeks now. AMIRITE, or AMIRITE.
Harry S Deals wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025 13:05 pm
Hmm, i guess why not hes immediately better than McGing or Luff
IDK, McGing has played pretty decently.
He was, for a bottom 6 guy. Better some moments than others, but as good as could be expected.
But Berggren has as many NHL points this season as McGing has AHL points, and Hugh hasn't scored more than 39 points at any level since USHL 10 years ago, whereas Jonatan scored 64 and was basically a PPG player in the AHL regular season and playoffs with a great rookie NHL season.
There is a clear difference in talent level, but it's anybody's guess why Berggren has regressed into his age 25 season.
Harry S Deals wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025 13:05 pm
Hmm, i guess why not hes immediately better than McGing or Luff
IDK, McGing has played pretty decently.
He was, for a bottom 6 guy. Better some moments than others, but as good as could be expected.
But Berggren has as many NHL points this season as McGing has AHL points, and Hugh hasn't scored more than 39 points at any level since USHL 10 years ago, whereas Jonatan scored 64 and was basically a PPG player in the AHL regular season and playoffs with a great rookie NHL season.
There is a clear difference in talent level, but it's anybody's guess why Berggren has regressed into his age 25 season.
I'll wait to see what the energy level is.
McGing came in and played balls out and hard not to respect that and also recognize how the rest of the team needs to do the same dam thing if they want to win hockey games.
Blues potentially are going to have a really heavy European influence on this team can't recall when the franchise had so many. Blues may retain Sunny as a spiritual leader
Harry S Deals wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 18:46 pm
Blues potentially are going to have a really heavy European influence on this team can't recall when the franchise had so many. Blues may retain Sunny as a spiritual leader
Harry S Deals wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025 18:46 pm
Blues potentially are going to have a really heavy European influence on this team can't recall when the franchise had so many. Blues may retain Sunny as a spiritual leader
Sundqvist
Broberg
Stenberg
Lindstein
Berggren
Dvorsky
Pekarcik
Jiricek
Stancl
Buchnevich
Toropchenko
Kaskimaki
Probably why they are so soft.
I don't really equate that to soft, Otto and Dvo don't look soft.
Eh, Berggren played pretty well last night, but 99.9% of the time you’re gonna get all out full effort from a player in the beginning of his tenure with a new team, just like the new coach spark that usually happens, so just ride it out and then release em or put em back on waivers when he starts sucking again. If he’s the .01% that sustains his good play once and for all and becomes consistent, then even better.