Shut up Bobo.Shady wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 14:29 pm Would the returns for Contreras, Romero, Nootbaar, Arenado and a catcher bring back enough help for the next few seasons to make not trading Donovan a better choice? I think so. With the added starting pitching An infield of Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B and adding a really productive outfield hitter might be very competitive for, at least, a wildcard in '26. Adding a really productive outfield hitter, somehow, is probably the key.
If Bloom can't get a windfall for Donovan
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
scoutyjones2
- Forum User
- Posts: 8776
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: If Bloom can't get a windfall for Donovan
Re: If Bloom can't get a windfall for Donovan
Ok Sarge whatever you say!craviduce wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 15:14 pmand Cusecards is there both times saying "it could happen"ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 15:11 pmI thought this OP looked familiar. Shady’s OP last Wednesday:Shady wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 14:29 pm Would the returns for Contreras, Romero, Nootbaar, Arenado and a catcher bring back enough help for the next few seasons to make not trading Donovan a better choice? I think so. With the added starting pitching An infield of Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B and adding a really productive outfield hitter might be very competitive for, at least, a wildcard in '26. Adding a really productive outfield hitter, somehow, is probably the key.
“Maybe Bloom, first, wants to see what he can get for Contreras, Nootbaar, Romero, Arenado, some catcher depth and even Gorman. An infield of Donovan, Winn, Wetherholt and Burleson might just compete for a Division title in '26, already, if the others mentioned can bring back enough to fill some needs.”
viewtopic.php?t=1518571&hilit=Enticing
Pretty similar, no?
hmmm...![]()
![]()
Truth is.....the word “could” is pretty open ended.
As in Dumb & Dumber....”so you think there’s a chance??”
And you know as well as I do that if other players are moved(especially Gorman AND Arenado) that there is a reason to keep Donovan.
But.....sorry if I got in the way of your Shady Bashing obsession.
LOL
Re: If Bloom can't get a windfall for Donovan
How can an impactful outfield hitter be acquired for next season without trading Donovan for one? Or could it be Herrera?Shady wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 14:29 pm Would the returns for Contreras, Romero, Nootbaar, Arenado and a catcher bring back enough help for the next few seasons to make not trading Donovan a better choice? I think so. With the added starting pitching An infield of Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B and adding a really productive outfield hitter might be very competitive for, at least, a wildcard in '26. Adding a really productive outfield hitter, somehow, is probably the key.
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1532
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: If Bloom can't get a windfall for Donovan
Shady wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 16:15 pmHow can an impactful outfield hitter be acquired for next season without trading Donovan for one? Or could it be Herrera?Shady wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 14:29 pm Would the returns for Contreras, Romero, Nootbaar, Arenado and a catcher bring back enough help for the next few seasons to make not trading Donovan a better choice? I think so. With the added starting pitching An infield of Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B and adding a really productive outfield hitter might be very competitive for, at least, a wildcard in '26. Adding a really productive outfield hitter, somehow, is probably the key.

-
DwaininAztec
- Forum User
- Posts: 353
- Joined: 23 May 2024 22:26 pm
Re: If Bloom can't get a windfall for Donovan
LOL . I was just having a laugh. It was funny you were 2nd each time.Cusecards wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 16:04 pmOk Sarge whatever you say!craviduce wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 15:14 pmand Cusecards is there both times saying "it could happen"ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 15:11 pmI thought this OP looked familiar. Shady’s OP last Wednesday:Shady wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 14:29 pm Would the returns for Contreras, Romero, Nootbaar, Arenado and a catcher bring back enough help for the next few seasons to make not trading Donovan a better choice? I think so. With the added starting pitching An infield of Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B and adding a really productive outfield hitter might be very competitive for, at least, a wildcard in '26. Adding a really productive outfield hitter, somehow, is probably the key.
“Maybe Bloom, first, wants to see what he can get for Contreras, Nootbaar, Romero, Arenado, some catcher depth and even Gorman. An infield of Donovan, Winn, Wetherholt and Burleson might just compete for a Division title in '26, already, if the others mentioned can bring back enough to fill some needs.”
viewtopic.php?t=1518571&hilit=Enticing
Pretty similar, no?
hmmm...![]()
![]()
Truth is.....the word “could” is pretty open ended.
As in Dumb & Dumber....”so you think there’s a chance??”
And you know as well as I do that if other players are moved(especially Gorman AND Arenado) that there is a reason to keep Donovan.
But.....sorry if I got in the way of your Shady Bashing obsession.
LOL
I thought the wink was proof of the joke.
Re: If Bloom can't get a windfall for Donovan
Aztec, are you sure it wasn't in the Burly is the next Joey Votto thread? You may be right, it might have been Skubal. Too many informative Shady posts to keep up with.
Re: If Bloom can't get a windfall for Donovan
As I have said before, and it scares me I agree with Shady, this is a similar situation the Royals for themselves in with Whit Merrifield. They couldn’t get enough in return to make it worthwhile to trade him. Of course, YEARS later, when they did trade him to Toronto, they got closer to his value. By then, of course, his value had declined. The Cardinals are kind of in a dammed if they do and dammed if they don’t, situation.craviduce wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 14:56 pmthe longer you keep him the lower his value to other teams will be....b/c they would've filled their holes going into the season.Shady wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 14:49 pmThis is a scenario. That Bloom can't get enough for Donovan to make trading him worthwhile.craviduce wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 14:43 pmthere's no "good" scenario to keeping Donovan going into the 2026 season.
You want 2 established MLB players for Donovan....no team will give you that. So you'll keep him and get nothing for him?
Re: If Bloom can't get a windfall for Donovan
Hey Duce we’re good! You’re one of my favorite posters and you provide a ton of info on the Minors which I appreciate!craviduce wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 16:30 pmLOL . I was just having a laugh. It was funny you were 2nd each time.Cusecards wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 16:04 pmOk Sarge whatever you say!craviduce wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 15:14 pmand Cusecards is there both times saying "it could happen"ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 15:11 pmI thought this OP looked familiar. Shady’s OP last Wednesday:Shady wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 14:29 pm Would the returns for Contreras, Romero, Nootbaar, Arenado and a catcher bring back enough help for the next few seasons to make not trading Donovan a better choice? I think so. With the added starting pitching An infield of Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B and adding a really productive outfield hitter might be very competitive for, at least, a wildcard in '26. Adding a really productive outfield hitter, somehow, is probably the key.
“Maybe Bloom, first, wants to see what he can get for Contreras, Nootbaar, Romero, Arenado, some catcher depth and even Gorman. An infield of Donovan, Winn, Wetherholt and Burleson might just compete for a Division title in '26, already, if the others mentioned can bring back enough to fill some needs.”
viewtopic.php?t=1518571&hilit=Enticing
Pretty similar, no?
hmmm...![]()
![]()
Truth is.....the word “could” is pretty open ended.
As in Dumb & Dumber....”so you think there’s a chance??”
And you know as well as I do that if other players are moved(especially Gorman AND Arenado) that there is a reason to keep Donovan.
But.....sorry if I got in the way of your Shady Bashing obsession.
LOL
I thought the wink was proof of the joke.
Wasn’t sure where you were going?
I admit.....I was hoping they could hang onto Donovan and deal Gorman & Noot(obviously Arenado also).
But....Gorman probably doesn’t return much.
Re: If Bloom can't get a windfall for Donovan
Getting Ryan Sloan from the Mariners would seem to be close to a "windfall" for Donovan.
Re: If Bloom can't get a windfall for Donovan
Technically.....if you were to deal Arenado and Noot you could still have a solid OF bat in Donovan and Burleson.Shady wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 16:15 pmHow can an impactful outfield hitter be acquired for next season without trading Donovan for one? Or could it be Herrera?Shady wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 14:29 pm Would the returns for Contreras, Romero, Nootbaar, Arenado and a catcher bring back enough help for the next few seasons to make not trading Donovan a better choice? I think so. With the added starting pitching An infield of Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B and adding a really productive outfield hitter might be very competitive for, at least, a wildcard in '26. Adding a really productive outfield hitter, somehow, is probably the key.
Not to mention Herrera could be converted to LF also?
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1532
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: If Bloom can't get a windfall for Donovan
Good point. A good POBO evaluates players more against the league instead of his own club. Donovan was an All Star but that was due more to rule than merit. I like him but he's not a cornerstone player. They need to take a chance and flip him for a younger player who could become one.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 14:48 pmBig +1 he’s better than JAG but people are way overvaluing him they act like he’s an elite player when he’s just a complimentary piece on a good team
Re: If Bloom can't get a windfall for Donovan
I was thinking more of Donovan at 3B, Burleson at 1B.Cusecards wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 17:37 pmTechnically.....if you were to deal Arenado and Noot you could still have a solid OF bat in Donovan and Burleson.Shady wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 16:15 pmHow can an impactful outfield hitter be acquired for next season without trading Donovan for one? Or could it be Herrera?Shady wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 14:29 pm Would the returns for Contreras, Romero, Nootbaar, Arenado and a catcher bring back enough help for the next few seasons to make not trading Donovan a better choice? I think so. With the added starting pitching An infield of Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B and adding a really productive outfield hitter might be very competitive for, at least, a wildcard in '26. Adding a really productive outfield hitter, somehow, is probably the key.
Not to mention Herrera could be converted to LF also?
-
BleedingBleu
- Forum User
- Posts: 101
- Joined: 30 Nov 2025 07:19 am
Re: If Bloom can't get a windfall for Donovan
Just because he can play those positions doesn’t mean he can play them particularly well.Pura Vida wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 15:24 pm Donovan is your best all around player...can play 2nd, 3rd, RF, LF and believe it or not, there is interest.(sarcasm) They have much dead weight who are not performing...sorry! This is ridiculous unless Bloom scores BIG! Not to mention, Donovan plays "the Cardinal way".
Versatility is nice, but he was a mediocre defender at both 2B & LF.
Re: If Bloom can't get a windfall for Donovan
Unless if Burleson steps up the power or pulls a Naylor and starts stealing bases his mediocre 1.9 bWAR value is likely at its peak. Trade him.Shady wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 18:57 pmI was thinking more of Donovan at 3B, Burleson at 1B.Cusecards wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 17:37 pmTechnically.....if you were to deal Arenado and Noot you could still have a solid OF bat in Donovan and Burleson.Shady wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 16:15 pmHow can an impactful outfield hitter be acquired for next season without trading Donovan for one? Or could it be Herrera?Shady wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 14:29 pm Would the returns for Contreras, Romero, Nootbaar, Arenado and a catcher bring back enough help for the next few seasons to make not trading Donovan a better choice? I think so. With the added starting pitching An infield of Donovan 3B, Winn SS, Wetherholt 2B and Burleson 1B and adding a really productive outfield hitter might be very competitive for, at least, a wildcard in '26. Adding a really productive outfield hitter, somehow, is probably the key.
Not to mention Herrera could be converted to LF also?