Mets are interested in Nootbaar and Contreras
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Mets are interested in Nootbaar and Contreras
According to my sources. Both would be good fits for the Mets.
Last edited by Shady on 11 Dec 2025 08:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1524
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Mets are interested in Nootbaar and Contreras
Would your "source" happen to be another thread? viewtopic.php?t=1518579
Also included in that thread: https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2025/12/ ... tbaar.html
Also included in that thread: https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2025/12/ ... tbaar.html
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 13474
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Mets are interested in Nootbaar and Contreras
Or this where where multiple of us made the suggestion:NYCardsFan wrote: ↑11 Dec 2025 08:44 am Would your "source" happen to be another thread? viewtopic.php?t=1518579
Also included in that thread: https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2025/12/ ... tbaar.html
viewtopic.php?p=13206000&hilit=Mutts#p13206000
-
scoutyjones2
- Forum User
- Posts: 8752
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: Mets are interested in Nootbaar and Contreras
They can get them both for Nolan McLean +..........but of course the Mets won't do that. How about Jonah Tong + EJ Ewing or Jett Williams? How about Brandon Sprout + Jacob Reimer? Go get 'em Chaim!!
Re: Mets are interested in Nootbaar and Contreras
-
mattmitchl44
- Forum User
- Posts: 2640
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:33 pm
Re: Mets are interested in Nootbaar and Contreras
I would take Tong (BTV +25.8) for Contreras (-14.1) and Nootbaar (+11.9) in a second, but the Mets would never do that.
Re: Mets are interested in Nootbaar and Contreras
Ok deepthroat
Re: Mets are interested in Nootbaar and Contreras
This example right here is why you take so much flak from other posters! But of course you are well aware of that, as it fits into your narrative for the attention you are seeking here. Congrats on another successful example of doing just that! Figured out what your handle stands for.
S=Stupid
H=Harrassing
A=Alarmingly
D=Dumb
Y=Yapper
-
JuanAgosto
- Forum User
- Posts: 6429
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: Mets are interested in Nootbaar and Contreras
Who they got to offer in that deal?
-
Talkin' Baseball
- Forum User
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: Mets are interested in Nootbaar and Contreras
Sometimes I have to take BTV with a grain of salt. In the case of Contreras I have to dismiss it altogether. I had a thread recently about whether his contract was really underwater. I compared his production to Josh Naylor who had just signed a contract for an AAV ever so slightly higher than Contreras. WC and JN were almost identical in every meaningful offensive category. Contreras plays better defense. While older, his contract is also shorter. BTV has a value of -2.8 for Josh Naylor and -14.9 for Contreras. With the Naylor signing being a fresh, market value signing (most believe he could have gotten more, but wanted to come back to Seattle), I take that to be the true market value for that level of production at that position, and would value Willson more closely to Naylor's value.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑11 Dec 2025 09:34 amI would take Tong (BTV +25.for Contreras (-14.1) and Nootbaar (+11.9) in a second, but the Mets would never do that.
That said, if the Mets truly do have interest in both Nootbaar and Contreras, you should be able to send them along with 10M for a prospect like Carson Benge (would make Craviduce and I both very happy). Benge is the #21 prospect in baseball and should start the year at AAA. He seems likely to be ready for MLB before the season is over.
Re: Mets are interested in Nootbaar and Contreras
Ever watch SNL when someone gets a jacket for hosting for the fifth time and other five-time hosts give a mock welcome to the club? You earned your jacket, come on in.