Data says N/A bat was worse than that of Gorman, Donovan, and Fermin in 2025.Dicktar2023 wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 20:15 pmI was only refuting Mel's claim that there were alternatives that were "far more productive" in 2025, which is clearly false.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 20:09 pmWhen healthy NA was much superior to NG in the first half.Dicktar2023 wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 20:00 pmPlease show me a single stat where Gorman was significantly better than NA in 2025.Melville wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 18:54 pmStatistically, Gorman, Donovan, and even Fermin were all far more productive than N/A in 2025.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 18:46 pmWho?
You can't name one
Next year, Wetherholt will join that list - at a minimum.
Though unlikely, it would not be a shock if 2 more did as well.
They're basically the same player at this point.
You don’t release him unless he’s hurt and never coming back. He seems to be healthy at this point.
Whether to release NA is between BDW and his pocketbook. But Saint Bloom is going to look like a bit of a clown if NA is still on the opening day roster.
Which was my original statement, and which is fully correct.
It should be true in 2026 as well.
Now, defense is another matter.
If you put stock in such metrics, N/A was a slightly below average 3b glove in 2025.
Since Donovan, Gorman, Fermin, and obviously Wetherholt have never spent a full season playing 3b at the MLB level, any projection as to how any would compare to N/A in 2026 is just that - a projection.
But one thing is certain.
N/A at 3b does nothing to make the team better.
Any of the other four might.
Which is precisely why Bloom is working so hard to trade N/A again.