Exactly my point. So many other positive outcomes with a guy throwing BB’s.renostl wrote: ↑26 Nov 2025 06:31 amMaybe barrel rates become lower versus pitchers who are more difficult to hitNorthernBird wrote: ↑26 Nov 2025 03:44 amI don’t think you’ve made a case for meaning in 2 SOs per game. What you’ve instead now pivoted to is overall stats correlating with better pitching staffs. However, there’s no causation proven that 2 extra SOs per game is the difference maker from a bottom of the league staff and a top of the league staff.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑26 Nov 2025 03:36 amSeems like it turns out to be meaningful.NorthernBird wrote: ↑26 Nov 2025 03:27 amThe Cards were less than 1 strikeout per game lower than league average, and less than 2 strikeouts per game lower than the league leader.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑26 Nov 2025 02:56 amAs a team, the Cardinals have been 29th in K/9 over the last three seasons, 29th in K/9 over the last five seasons, and 26th in K/9 over the last 10 seasons. They have not prioritized "strikeout stuff" on their pitching staff.The Nard wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 20:49 pmSince when have they had a pitch-to-contact approach? Not for almost 10 years. They seem to have many hard-throwing prospects come up, who couldn’t hit the side of a barnmattmitchl44 wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 19:44 pm ...when it comes to modern, pitching prospects.
Instead of their antiquated, pitch-to-contact, try to get groundballs approach to prioritizing pitchers, get fastball-slider guys who throw really hard (Fitts 60/60 FB, 55/55 SL; Clarke 60/60 FB, 70/80 SL; Doyle 70/70 FB, 50/60 SL). If you can get fastball-slider guys to develop one more pitch and better control, you have the makings of a FOR SP. And even if you can't, you can fill a bullpen with dominant fastball-slider guys and be able to shut down games from the sixth inning on.
Their traditional soft tossing, pitch-to-contact, try to get groundballs pitchers almost always have a limited ceiling and a basement of being unusable instead of a floor.
Maybe Mikolas and Pallante are who you’re thinking of. Yet they succeeded when they have command of their pitches.
Contact pitchers who have good command of the zone - changing speeds andhitting the outside corners - will still succeed in this era.
Is that meaningful? Are two SOs a game what did it in for the Cards’ staff?
Of the top 10 teams in K/9, eight had team ERAs under 4.00. Of the bottom 10 teams in K/9, seven had team ERAs above 4.00.
Maybe not a "decisive" difference, but a meaningful one.
Just for a minute, remove yourself from the numbers and think about the actual game. Two SOs. Maybe one extra in the 2nd inning and one in the 7th. That’s it. The difference between the Rockies and the Dodgers, according to your argument.
Maybe the Cardinals finally get it...
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
sikeston bulldog2
- Forum User
- Posts: 14186
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: Maybe the Cardinals finally get it...
Re: Maybe the Cardinals finally get it...
mcgreevy is pitch to contactThe Nard wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 20:49 pmSince when have they had a pitch-to-contact approach? Not for almost 10 years. They seem to have many hard-throwing prospects come up, who couldn’t hit the side of a barnmattmitchl44 wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 19:44 pm ...when it comes to modern, pitching prospects.
Instead of their antiquated, pitch-to-contact, try to get groundballs approach to prioritizing pitchers, get fastball-slider guys who throw really hard (Fitts 60/60 FB, 55/55 SL; Clarke 60/60 FB, 70/80 SL; Doyle 70/70 FB, 50/60 SL). If you can get fastball-slider guys to develop one more pitch and better control, you have the makings of a FOR SP. And even if you can't, you can fill a bullpen with dominant fastball-slider guys and be able to shut down games from the sixth inning on.
Their traditional soft tossing, pitch-to-contact, try to get groundballs pitchers almost always have a limited ceiling and a basement of being unusable instead of a floor.
Maybe Mikolas and Pallante are who you’re thinking of. Yet they succeeded when they have command of their pitches.
Contact pitchers who have good command of the zone - changing speeds andhitting the outside corners - will still succeed in this era.
Re: Maybe the Cardinals finally get it...
Sort of, the Dodgers bought a lot of their pitchers.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑26 Nov 2025 06:13 amThe Dodgers model. If one thing stands out other than loading up with stars, it’s the dodgers staff. They have more on the IL than most have on roster.
Following a the dodgers model.
-
mattmitchl44
- Forum User
- Posts: 2635
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:33 pm
Re: Maybe the Cardinals finally get it...
FWIW - the Dodgers are, of course, usually among the leaders in team K/9 (1st last year, 6th over the last 5 years, 3rd over the last 10 years, etc.)alw80 wrote: ↑26 Nov 2025 08:09 amSort of, the Dodgers bought a lot of their pitchers.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑26 Nov 2025 06:13 amThe Dodgers model. If one thing stands out other than loading up with stars, it’s the dodgers staff. They have more on the IL than most have on roster.
Following a the dodgers model.
Re: Maybe the Cardinals finally get it...
Matt, the great equalizer in MLB is the changeup. The Cardinals need to have pitchers who can keep hitters off balance with a great changeup.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 19:44 pm ...when it comes to modern, pitching prospects.
Instead of their antiquated, pitch-to-contact, try to get groundballs approach to prioritizing pitchers, get fastball-slider guys who throw really hard (Fitts 60/60 FB, 55/55 SL; Clarke 60/60 FB, 70/80 SL; Doyle 70/70 FB, 50/60 SL). If you can get fastball-slider guys to develop one more pitch and better control, you have the makings of a FOR SP. And even if you can't, you can fill a bullpen with dominant fastball-slider guys and be able to shut down games from the sixth inning on.
Their traditional soft tossing, pitch-to-contact, try to get groundballs pitchers almost always have a limited ceiling and a basement of being unusable instead of a floor.
Re: Maybe the Cardinals finally get it...
Surprisingly the Cards had the most 100 mph pitches over the last however many seasons……
-
mattmitchl44
- Forum User
- Posts: 2635
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:33 pm
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 13451
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Maybe the Cardinals finally get it...
I think we saw C. Bloom's influence in the Doyle selection last year, again now w/Clark and others drafted since he came on-board.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 19:44 pm ...when it comes to modern, pitching prospects.
Instead of their antiquated, pitch-to-contact, try to get groundballs approach to prioritizing pitchers, get fastball-slider guys who throw really hard (Fitts 60/60 FB, 55/55 SL; Clarke 60/60 FB, 70/80 SL; Doyle 70/70 FB, 50/60 SL). If you can get fastball-slider guys to develop one more pitch and better control, you have the makings of a FOR SP. And even if you can't, you can fill a bullpen with dominant fastball-slider guys and be able to shut down games from the sixth inning on.
Their traditional soft tossing, pitch-to-contact, try to get groundballs pitchers almost always have a limited ceiling and a basement of being unusable instead of a floor.
Power pitching has been the way to go now for some time (power hitting too and I look for Bloom to address this thru the draft, FA and trades too).
Mo continued to operate like he still had D. Duncan running the pitching staff.
Re: Maybe the Cardinals finally get it...
Saw it on X a couple weeks ago…..most likely those 2mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑26 Nov 2025 08:37 amLink?
Who have they had to can reach 100 mph? Helsley and Hicks? And Hicks hasn't pitched for STL for 2.5 seasons.
-
hugeCardfan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:42 pm
Re: Maybe the Cardinals finally get it...
Dave didn't hate K'ing the opponents, he just hated BB's. He would have no intention of turning Carpenter into a pitch to contact hurler, but he could take a sow's ear and turn it into a silk purse better than anybody. Tony wouldn't leave home without him.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑26 Nov 2025 04:25 amBTW - even in the Dave Duncan era (1996-2011), the Cardinals were 22nd in K/9, not 29th. Even the guru of pitch to contact, get groundballs had staffs that were a bit more in line with MLB averages than they have been recently.hugeCardfan wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 19:55 pmRIP Dave Duncan...mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 19:44 pm ...when it comes to modern, pitching prospects.
Instead of their antiquated, pitch-to-contact, try to get groundballs approach to prioritizing pitchers, get fastball-slider guys who throw really hard (Fitts 60/60 FB, 55/55 SL; Clarke 60/60 FB, 70/80 SL; Doyle 70/70 FB, 50/60 SL). If you can get fastball-slider guys to develop one more pitch and better control, you have the makings of a FOR SP. And even if you can't, you can fill a bullpen with dominant fastball-slider guys and be able to shut down games from the sixth inning on.
Their traditional soft tossing, pitch-to-contact, try to get groundballs pitchers almost always have a limited ceiling and a basement of being unusable instead of a floor.