Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

redbirdfan51
Forum User
Posts: 799
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:45 pm

Re: Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Post by redbirdfan51 »

That looks about right to me. Cards may leave a spot or two open for adding a player or two from the pool of players available today.
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1575
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Post by ScotchMIrish »

82birds
Forum User
Posts: 16983
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:17 pm

Re: Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Post by 82birds »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 18 Nov 2025 09:13 am The Cardinals have to make some tough decisions ahead of tonight's Rule 5 protection deadline.

Mautz, Bernal, Baez, Hjerpe according to redbird rants.
already posted but twice is better than once. :)
Hoosier59
Forum User
Posts: 1237
Joined: 16 Dec 2022 12:03 pm

Re: Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Post by Hoosier59 »

What’s really surprising is that there hasn’t been a lot of movement yet by any teams, especially the Cardinals, leading up to this deadline! Don’t know if Bloom is trying to make last minute trades, or releases if nothing transpires, or what. Just seems kinda odd, but I guess we’ll see. I can’t see them keeping certain players on the 40 man that are currently on there. Especially over some young players that probably need protected!
cards53
Forum User
Posts: 98
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:02 pm

Re: Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Post by cards53 »

I haven't seen any posters mention Miguel Ugueto in this rule 5 thread.

I think he is rule 5 eligible and has shown some promise in the AFL this fall.
Makes hard contact and good bat to ball skills. 60 ABs, .350 BA, 16 RBIs
craviduce
Forum User
Posts: 24344
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm

Re: Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Post by craviduce »

cards53 wrote: 18 Nov 2025 11:33 am I haven't seen any posters mention Miguel Ugueto in this rule 5 thread.

I think he is rule 5 eligible and has shown some promise in the AFL this fall.
Makes hard contact and good bat to ball skills. 60 ABs, .350 BA, 16 RBIs
swing first, ask questions later...Under 4% walk rate. Singles hitter. And here's the big negative: he can't stay on the field...he plows into the wall with reckless abandon constantly....never had a full season of games...NEVER. Has missed too much time each year.

Love the contact, I do...love the effort in the OF...but I'd roll the dice on not protecting him...we selected him in the AAA R5 draft last year...stuck him AA. The Red Sox didn't think he was worth protecting either.
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1575
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Post by ScotchMIrish »

82birds wrote: 18 Nov 2025 10:47 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 18 Nov 2025 09:13 am The Cardinals have to make some tough decisions ahead of tonight's Rule 5 protection deadline.

Mautz, Bernal, Baez, Hjerpe according to redbird rants.
already posted but twice is better than once. :)
Here to help.
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 6232
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Post by ramfandan »

Will Cardinals protect Pete Hansen in Rule 5 draft ?

Nobody seems to be talking about this 'unranked prospect in Cardinals system .

Thought I would post it here since he seems to be out of most conversations.

https://www.si.com/mlb/cardinals/onsi/s ... e-jackson3
Shady
Forum User
Posts: 7179
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 15:39 pm

Re: Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Post by Shady »

With the Cardinals, apparently, in a rebuild, low spending mode. It wouldn't surprise me if Bloom claims a Rule 5 player.
craviduce
Forum User
Posts: 24344
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm

Re: Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Post by craviduce »

Shady wrote: 18 Nov 2025 12:26 pm With the Cardinals, apparently, in a rebuild, low spending mode. It wouldn't surprise me if Bloom claims a Rule 5 player.
GM's usually claim multiple Rule 5 players....we claimed 5 last year? Maybe it was 4.

Rebuild and Low Spending Mode aren't the reasons for selecting a player.
82birds
Forum User
Posts: 16983
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:17 pm

Re: Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Post by 82birds »

picking someone in the minor league portion of the draft is common for the Cards.
NYCardsFan
Forum User
Posts: 1532
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm

Re: Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Post by NYCardsFan »

craviduce wrote: 18 Nov 2025 14:03 pm
Shady wrote: 18 Nov 2025 12:26 pm With the Cardinals, apparently, in a rebuild, low spending mode. It wouldn't surprise me if Bloom claims a Rule 5 player.
GM's usually claim multiple Rule 5 players....we claimed 5 last year? Maybe it was 4.

Rebuild and Low Spending Mode aren't the reasons for selecting a player.
It wouldn’t surprise him if Bloom does something that the Cardinals did last year (Minor League phase) and the year before (Fernandez) . . .
scoutyjones2
Forum User
Posts: 8776
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm

Re: Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Post by scoutyjones2 »

Hoosier59 wrote: 18 Nov 2025 11:15 am What’s really surprising is that there hasn’t been a lot of movement yet by any teams, especially the Cardinals, leading up to this deadline! Don’t know if Bloom is trying to make last minute trades, or releases if nothing transpires, or what. Just seems kinda odd, but I guess we’ll see. I can’t see them keeping certain players on the 40 man that are currently on there. Especially over some young players that probably need protected!
It's not even December...chillax :roll:
craviduce
Forum User
Posts: 24344
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm

Re: Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Post by craviduce »

NYCardsFan wrote: 18 Nov 2025 14:26 pm
craviduce wrote: 18 Nov 2025 14:03 pm
Shady wrote: 18 Nov 2025 12:26 pm With the Cardinals, apparently, in a rebuild, low spending mode. It wouldn't surprise me if Bloom claims a Rule 5 player.
GM's usually claim multiple Rule 5 players....we claimed 5 last year? Maybe it was 4.

Rebuild and Low Spending Mode aren't the reasons for selecting a player.
It wouldn’t surprise him if Bloom does something that the Cardinals did last year (Minor League phase) and the year before (Fernandez) . . .
yep...I can see it. He just learned about the RULE 5 Draft a few days ago. ::crazya::



Also, on a serious note, I wouldn't be shocked if he 40man's Blaze Jordan and starts in St. Louis...whether he's ready or not. I think we'll need the cheapest form of warm bodies for the lineup this year. RHB, a little power potential (even though the EV wasn't there when I saw him...at least not where you'd want the EV's to be ...north of 100mph with the ball in the air).
Last edited by craviduce on 18 Nov 2025 14:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Shady
Forum User
Posts: 7179
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 15:39 pm

Re: Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Post by Shady »

82birds wrote: 18 Nov 2025 14:13 pm picking someone in the minor league portion of the draft is common for the Cards.
I feel there is a good chance Bloom will take a chance on a player that he feels can help the Cardinals next season. A don't believe there would be much cost involved. The only thing is the roster spot.
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 6878
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: Tuesday dealine to protect from Rule 5

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

craviduce wrote: 18 Nov 2025 14:45 pm
NYCardsFan wrote: 18 Nov 2025 14:26 pm
craviduce wrote: 18 Nov 2025 14:03 pm
Shady wrote: 18 Nov 2025 12:26 pm With the Cardinals, apparently, in a rebuild, low spending mode. It wouldn't surprise me if Bloom claims a Rule 5 player.
GM's usually claim multiple Rule 5 players....we claimed 5 last year? Maybe it was 4.

Rebuild and Low Spending Mode aren't the reasons for selecting a player.
It wouldn’t surprise him if Bloom does something that the Cardinals did last year (Minor League phase) and the year before (Fernandez) . . .
yep...I can see it. He just learned about the RULE 5 Draft a few days ago. ::crazya::



Also, on a serious note, I wouldn't be shocked if he 40man's Blaze Jordan and starts in St. Louis...whether he's ready or not. I think we'll need the cheapest form of warm bodies for the lineup this year. RHB, a little power potential (even though the EV wasn't there when I saw him...at least not where you'd want the EV's to be ...north of 100mph with the ball in the air).
Agree Bloom no doubt Bloom had input and was a big reason he was traded for last season I doubt he would think enough of him to want him in the trade just let him go in the rule 5 draft
Post Reply