Bloom just needs to run across a team that feels they might "catch lightning in a bottle" with Walker and/or Gorman.Cusecards wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:06 amSo that’s a “maybe” which is fair.
And yes.....they DID have elevated prospect status
but that was 2/3 years ago.
Anyone trading for them is going to base their value on their recent struggles.
Now....you might get a team willing to flip a “struggling” pitching prospect for either?
Basically change of scenery for those involved.
Would the Royals be interested in either Gorman or Walker for
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: Would the Royals be interested in either Gorman or Walker for
Last edited by Shady on 15 Nov 2025 10:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Would the Royals be interested in either Gorman or Walker for
LOL...I always chuckle at proposed deals that involve US unloading someone we don’t want for a player(s) that THEY find in demand.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025 21:55 pmlol no kidding some of the trade are preposterous and laughable like let’s trade Donovan and gray and crooks and burly for tatis lol yea sounds good unless u are the padres
Re: Would the Royals be interested in either Gorman or Walker for
TrueShady wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:09 amBloom just needs to run across a team that feels they might "catch lightning in a bottle" with Walker and/or Gorman.Cusecards wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:06 amSo that’s a “maybe” which is fair.
And yes.....they DID have elevated prospect status
but that was 2/3 years ago.
Anyone trading for them is going to base their value on their recent struggles.
Now....you might get a team willing to flip a “struggling” pitching prospect for either?
Basically change of scenery for those involved.
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Would the Royals be interested in either Gorman or Walker for
That’s basically every Shady trade proposal.Cusecards wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:09 amLOL...I always chuckle at proposed deals that involve US unloading someone we don’t want for a player(s) that THEY find in demand.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025 21:55 pmlol no kidding some of the trade are preposterous and laughable like let’s trade Donovan and gray and crooks and burly for tatis lol yea sounds good unless u are the padres
Re: Would the Royals be interested in either Gorman or Walker for
Every now and then a team trades for an "out of favor player" that comes on strong. That is what a savvy GM might do.Cusecards wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:09 amLOL...I always chuckle at proposed deals that involve US unloading someone we don’t want for a player(s) that THEY find in demand.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025 21:55 pmlol no kidding some of the trade are preposterous and laughable like let’s trade Donovan and gray and crooks and burly for tatis lol yea sounds good unless u are the padres
-
Youboughtit
- Forum User
- Posts: 4217
- Joined: 06 Oct 2020 15:45 pm
Re: Would the Royals be interested in either Gorman or Walker for
Royals have only showed interest in Donovan according to multiple sources. Fans always want to move players no one wants.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025 19:12 pm Another case of Shady plagiarism.
And the answer to your question is “no.” As numerous posters have told you countless times, Gorman and Walker have minimal trade value right now, you’re not going to get a “good, young, cost-controlled SP” for either one of them. Please stop.
-
scoutyjones2
- Forum User
- Posts: 8761
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: Would the Royals be interested in either Gorman or Walker for
Hey (bleep), he answered your question. Such a puke you areShady wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025 19:43 pmONYCardsFan wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025 19:12 pm Another case of Shady plagiarism.
And the answer to your question is “no.” As numerous posters have told you countless times, Gorman and Walker have minimal trade value right now, you’re not going to get a “good, young, cost-controlled SP” for either one of them. Please stop.
Thanks for the bump, Screwball. That's all you are good for. You are an obsessed trouble-maker.
Re: Would the Royals be interested in either Gorman or Walker for
That is true but you say “might” or “maybe” a lot which leaves it pretty open ended.Shady wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:13 amEvery now and then a team trades for an "out of favor player" that comes on strong. That is what a savvy GM might do.Cusecards wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:09 amLOL...I always chuckle at proposed deals that involve US unloading someone we don’t want for a player(s) that THEY find in demand.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025 21:55 pmlol no kidding some of the trade are preposterous and laughable like let’s trade Donovan and gray and crooks and burly for tatis lol yea sounds good unless u are the padres
Re: Would the Royals be interested in either Gorman or Walker for
True but he’s not alone in posting those kind of proposals!NYCardsFan wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:11 amThat’s basically every Shady trade proposal.Cusecards wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:09 amLOL...I always chuckle at proposed deals that involve US unloading someone we don’t want for a player(s) that THEY find in demand.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025 21:55 pmlol no kidding some of the trade are preposterous and laughable like let’s trade Donovan and gray and crooks and burly for tatis lol yea sounds good unless u are the padres
Re: Would the Royals be interested in either Gorman or Walker for
Some posters are too dense to decipher between a trade proposal and a trade query.Cusecards wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 15:42 pmTrue but he’s not alone in posting those kind of proposals!NYCardsFan wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:11 amThat’s basically every Shady trade proposal.Cusecards wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:09 amLOL...I always chuckle at proposed deals that involve US unloading someone we don’t want for a player(s) that THEY find in demand.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025 21:55 pmlol no kidding some of the trade are preposterous and laughable like let’s trade Donovan and gray and crooks and burly for tatis lol yea sounds good unless u are the padres
Re: Would the Royals be interested in either Gorman or Walker for
It's a proposal masquerading as a query. If for some reason people like it you can take credit for the idea. If it gets panned you throw up your hands and say "I'm just asking the question".Shady wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 15:43 pmSome posters are too dense to decipher between a trade proposal and a trade query.Cusecards wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 15:42 pmTrue but he’s not alone in posting those kind of proposals!NYCardsFan wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:11 amThat’s basically every Shady trade proposal.Cusecards wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:09 amLOL...I always chuckle at proposed deals that involve US unloading someone we don’t want for a player(s) that THEY find in demand.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025 21:55 pmlol no kidding some of the trade are preposterous and laughable like let’s trade Donovan and gray and crooks and burly for tatis lol yea sounds good unless u are the padres
-
Dicktar2023
- Forum User
- Posts: 1712
- Joined: 25 Jul 2023 12:31 pm
Re: Would the Royals be interested in either Gorman or Walker for
Walker for Cameron, straight up. Get to work, Chaim.
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Would the Royals be interested in either Gorman or Walker for
Shady already traded Walker for Bubba Chandler. But Gorman is still available for Cameron . . .
Re: Would the Royals be interested in either Gorman or Walker for
You are such of brilliant observer, Captain. NOTMort Gage wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 15:49 pmIt's a proposal masquerading as a query. If for some reason people like it you can take credit for the idea. If it gets panned you throw up your hands and say "I'm just asking the question".Shady wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 15:43 pmSome posters are too dense to decipher between a trade proposal and a trade query.Cusecards wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 15:42 pmTrue but he’s not alone in posting those kind of proposals!NYCardsFan wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:11 amThat’s basically every Shady trade proposal.Cusecards wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:09 amLOL...I always chuckle at proposed deals that involve US unloading someone we don’t want for a player(s) that THEY find in demand.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025 21:55 pmlol no kidding some of the trade are preposterous and laughable like let’s trade Donovan and gray and crooks and burly for tatis lol yea sounds good unless u are the padres
Re: Would the Royals be interested in either Gorman or Walker for
Trade “proposal” as opposed to a trade “query”?????Shady wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 15:43 pmSome posters are too dense to decipher between a trade proposal and a trade query.Cusecards wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 15:42 pmTrue but he’s not alone in posting those kind of proposals!NYCardsFan wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:11 amThat’s basically every Shady trade proposal.Cusecards wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025 10:09 amLOL...I always chuckle at proposed deals that involve US unloading someone we don’t want for a player(s) that THEY find in demand.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025 21:55 pmlol no kidding some of the trade are preposterous and laughable like let’s trade Donovan and gray and crooks and burly for tatis lol yea sounds good unless u are the padres
Seriously??????
I had a mouthful of food that I almost spit out when I read that!!!!!
That’s vintage ME-ville the Sideshow Clown stuff!!!!! LOL