Because Noah Dobson wanted to stay in the eastern conference.theograce wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:48 pmYou’re making “exactly” up. That’s really weird. The league has lots of concerns about kyrou’s future…just like they did Tarasenko’s.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:45 pmWell sure, if you ignore all the differences then I guess the 2 situations are exactly the same.theograce wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:39 pmOf course it is. The blues were trying hard to move him too.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:37 pmThis is nothing like Tarasenko. Tarasenko had multiple significant shoulder injuries that wrecked his shot, was a pending ufa, and publicly asked for a trade.theograce wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:20 pmFirst off it’s not the same production. And it’s about the player/person. What they bring/offset. Leadership etc. size/determination. These are core players.
As for Kyrou, his value should be at an all time low. Dallas wants to compete. I’d laugh at that proposal at this point in time.
The entire league has known Kyrou has been available. What does that tell you? It’s like Tarasenko.
Trading Kyrou now would be like trading Tarasenko before the shoulder injuries.
Why do you think Kyrou is a Blue?
Kyrou Trade idea in conference
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
The Average Gatsby
- Forum User
- Posts: 176
- Joined: 04 Jun 2025 15:44 pm
Re: Kyrou Trade idea in conference
Re: Kyrou Trade idea in conference
That’s your answer? Was a trade made? Pending?The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:53 pmBecause Noah Dobson wanted to stay in the eastern conference.theograce wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:48 pmYou’re making “exactly” up. That’s really weird. The league has lots of concerns about kyrou’s future…just like they did Tarasenko’s.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:45 pmWell sure, if you ignore all the differences then I guess the 2 situations are exactly the same.theograce wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:39 pmOf course it is. The blues were trying hard to move him too.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:37 pmThis is nothing like Tarasenko. Tarasenko had multiple significant shoulder injuries that wrecked his shot, was a pending ufa, and publicly asked for a trade.theograce wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:20 pmFirst off it’s not the same production. And it’s about the player/person. What they bring/offset. Leadership etc. size/determination. These are core players.
As for Kyrou, his value should be at an all time low. Dallas wants to compete. I’d laugh at that proposal at this point in time.
The entire league has known Kyrou has been available. What does that tell you? It’s like Tarasenko.
Trading Kyrou now would be like trading Tarasenko before the shoulder injuries.
Why do you think Kyrou is a Blue?
I guess the Habs/Isles be the only game in town. Value must be so high. Teams drooling
-
a smell of green grass
- Forum User
- Posts: 2217
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: Kyrou Trade idea in conference
Now that we all see that Kyrou's value is diminishing by the hour... We'll be lucky to get a bag of practice pucks in a week.
Homework Assignment:
Prepare 2-3 sentences (70 words) explaining who is most responsible for Kyrou's value in the open market?
Hint: This person is responsible for the value of every player on the roster.
Homework Assignment:
Prepare 2-3 sentences (70 words) explaining who is most responsible for Kyrou's value in the open market?
Hint: This person is responsible for the value of every player on the roster.
-
The Average Gatsby
- Forum User
- Posts: 176
- Joined: 04 Jun 2025 15:44 pm
Re: Kyrou Trade idea in conference
The fact that Kyrou hasn’t been traded does not automatically mean that he doesn’t have trade value. We know the blues were in on Dobson until the end and ultimately he decided he didn’t want to play in the west. I’m speculating that Kyrou was the player going the other way because Bolduc wouldn’t have been enough.theograce wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:58 pmThat’s your answer? Was a trade made? Pending?The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:53 pmBecause Noah Dobson wanted to stay in the eastern conference.theograce wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:48 pmYou’re making “exactly” up. That’s really weird. The league has lots of concerns about kyrou’s future…just like they did Tarasenko’s.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:45 pmWell sure, if you ignore all the differences then I guess the 2 situations are exactly the same.theograce wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:39 pmOf course it is. The blues were trying hard to move him too.The Average Gatsby wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:37 pmThis is nothing like Tarasenko. Tarasenko had multiple significant shoulder injuries that wrecked his shot, was a pending ufa, and publicly asked for a trade.theograce wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 16:20 pmFirst off it’s not the same production. And it’s about the player/person. What they bring/offset. Leadership etc. size/determination. These are core players.
As for Kyrou, his value should be at an all time low. Dallas wants to compete. I’d laugh at that proposal at this point in time.
The entire league has known Kyrou has been available. What does that tell you? It’s like Tarasenko.
Trading Kyrou now would be like trading Tarasenko before the shoulder injuries.
Why do you think Kyrou is a Blue?
I guess the Habs/Isles be the only game in town. Value must be so high. Teams drooling
Re: Kyrou Trade idea in conference
Hey Doug….
I’m calling about Kyrou.
I have some questions.
Why is his time the lowest it’s been in 4 years…especially since your team doesn’t have much talent?
Why’d you Bench him the other night?
What’s going on man? Why haven’t your coaches liked him for several years now?
I’m calling about Kyrou.
I have some questions.
Why is his time the lowest it’s been in 4 years…especially since your team doesn’t have much talent?
Why’d you Bench him the other night?
What’s going on man? Why haven’t your coaches liked him for several years now?
Re: Kyrou Trade idea in conference
Wait a minute...JK is 3 mil under the same "production" level as Robertson?Bacchk29 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 15:59 pmI don’t think I wanna pay 2-3 mil more for the same production. I can just put the three mentioned on waivers to send them down or buy the contracts out and bring Kasimaki Stenberg and whoever else to fill the roles. I need more of a game breaker than Robertson.Nublues69 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 15:51 pmLook past that please and give me a serious evaluation. It works for both teams one for one. we get slightly better player they get serious cap relief.netboy65 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 15:49 pmTeams generally don’t make trades of this magnitude within the division. Non starter.Nublues69 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 15:48 pm I just had an idea. Wanted to see what the peeps here think
Let preface it first
Dallas has a cap issues after signing Miko Rantenen and dont seem to have enough money to sign Jason Robertson.
My though is make a deal to trade Jordan Kyrou for jason robertson signed. I assume jason wants like 10 or 11. They get kyrou almost same production for 2 to 3 million less. We get a player that has better production and less bull[shirt]. We have cap space esepcially
Thoughts.
texier- 2.1m
joseph- 2.95m
sunny- 1.5m
replace texier with dvorsky
replace joseph with Carbonneau
replace sunny with Bjugstad and bring up Stenberg
lines could be as follows
Robertson Thomas buchnevich
snuggerud dvorsky hollowway
neighbors suter carbonnaue
torpo Bjugstad Schenn/walker
How can this be possible?
Around here......that's literally impossible.
But nobody wants Roberton over JK...so I'm gonna check that box off if that's ok.
Re: Kyrou Trade idea in conference
Now we have BANNED clown guy calling out DA with those ferocious internet questions from his basement.
hahahaha
omg
But hey dude....you have half this board and every troll with you now....carry on by all means.
hahahaha
omg
But hey dude....you have half this board and every troll with you now....carry on by all means.
Re: Kyrou Trade idea in conference
Robertson is a PPG player on a better team with more talent around him. So again, why do I want to pay AT LEAST 3 mil a year long term for the guy. That’s if Dallas would take the trade. St Louis has damaged Kyrou reputation to the point he IS losing trade value. Roughly same production for a guy who isn’t necessarily a game breaker. It’s not rocket science.dhsux wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 17:22 pmWait a minute...JK is 3 mil under the same "production" level as Robertson?Bacchk29 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 15:59 pmI don’t think I wanna pay 2-3 mil more for the same production. I can just put the three mentioned on waivers to send them down or buy the contracts out and bring Kasimaki Stenberg and whoever else to fill the roles. I need more of a game breaker than Robertson.Nublues69 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 15:51 pmLook past that please and give me a serious evaluation. It works for both teams one for one. we get slightly better player they get serious cap relief.netboy65 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 15:49 pmTeams generally don’t make trades of this magnitude within the division. Non starter.Nublues69 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 15:48 pm I just had an idea. Wanted to see what the peeps here think
Let preface it first
Dallas has a cap issues after signing Miko Rantenen and dont seem to have enough money to sign Jason Robertson.
My though is make a deal to trade Jordan Kyrou for jason robertson signed. I assume jason wants like 10 or 11. They get kyrou almost same production for 2 to 3 million less. We get a player that has better production and less bull[shirt]. We have cap space esepcially
Thoughts.
texier- 2.1m
joseph- 2.95m
sunny- 1.5m
replace texier with dvorsky
replace joseph with Carbonneau
replace sunny with Bjugstad and bring up Stenberg
lines could be as follows
Robertson Thomas buchnevich
snuggerud dvorsky hollowway
neighbors suter carbonnaue
torpo Bjugstad Schenn/walker
How can this be possible?
Around here......that's literally impossible.
But nobody wants Roberton over JK...so I'm gonna check that box off if that's ok.
Re: Kyrou Trade idea in conference
I'll know, and you will know JK's value when the market determines that.Bacchk29 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 18:00 pmRobertson is a PPG player on a better team with more talent around him. So again, why do I want to pay AT LEAST 3 mil a year long term for the guy. That’s if Dallas would take the trade. St Louis has damaged Kyrou reputation to the point he IS losing trade value. Roughly same production for a guy who isn’t necessarily a game breaker. It’s not rocket science.dhsux wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 17:22 pmWait a minute...JK is 3 mil under the same "production" level as Robertson?Bacchk29 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 15:59 pmI don’t think I wanna pay 2-3 mil more for the same production. I can just put the three mentioned on waivers to send them down or buy the contracts out and bring Kasimaki Stenberg and whoever else to fill the roles. I need more of a game breaker than Robertson.Nublues69 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 15:51 pmLook past that please and give me a serious evaluation. It works for both teams one for one. we get slightly better player they get serious cap relief.netboy65 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 15:49 pmTeams generally don’t make trades of this magnitude within the division. Non starter.Nublues69 wrote: ↑10 Nov 2025 15:48 pm I just had an idea. Wanted to see what the peeps here think
Let preface it first
Dallas has a cap issues after signing Miko Rantenen and dont seem to have enough money to sign Jason Robertson.
My though is make a deal to trade Jordan Kyrou for jason robertson signed. I assume jason wants like 10 or 11. They get kyrou almost same production for 2 to 3 million less. We get a player that has better production and less bull[shirt]. We have cap space esepcially
Thoughts.
texier- 2.1m
joseph- 2.95m
sunny- 1.5m
replace texier with dvorsky
replace joseph with Carbonneau
replace sunny with Bjugstad and bring up Stenberg
lines could be as follows
Robertson Thomas buchnevich
snuggerud dvorsky hollowway
neighbors suter carbonnaue
torpo Bjugstad Schenn/walker
How can this be possible?
Around here......that's literally impossible.
But nobody wants Roberton over JK...so I'm gonna check that box off if that's ok.
All I'm saying is no one here wants Robertson for JK ...and I find that more than interesting for what it is around here.
As far as how "the Blues" have destroyed his value, or weakened it, that remains to be seen and until then a bunch of talk. And in the end I will put JK's trade value on JK, not the Blues.
-
Mr.Snuggleupagus
- Banned User
- Posts: 860
- Joined: 23 Aug 2025 17:34 pm
Re: Kyrou Trade idea in conference
I hate Robertson's fat ugly stupid face.
I would take him over Kyrou though.
I would take him over Kyrou though.
-
Harry York 37
- Forum User
- Posts: 2434
- Joined: 15 Oct 2019 08:36 am
Re: Kyrou Trade idea in conference
The Blues never destroyed Kyrou’s value.
Kyrou, single- handedly and bull-headedly destroyed his own value.
If he had listened to Berube, instead of …ignoring his Coach’s (bleep) COACHING….. he would he been an All-Star every year after he won fastest skater…
Why would we pay 3 million extra for the same offensive production?
Consider it chemotherapy.
We are seeing our team’s compete level on its death bed.
You must remove the malignancy.
Else, the heart of the Blues will stop beating entirely.
Quitting on plays is too contagious.
Kyrou, single- handedly and bull-headedly destroyed his own value.
If he had listened to Berube, instead of …ignoring his Coach’s (bleep) COACHING….. he would he been an All-Star every year after he won fastest skater…
Why would we pay 3 million extra for the same offensive production?
Consider it chemotherapy.
We are seeing our team’s compete level on its death bed.
You must remove the malignancy.
Else, the heart of the Blues will stop beating entirely.
Quitting on plays is too contagious.
Re: Kyrou Trade idea in conference
The transition is complete. You’re full loco now.Harry York 37 wrote: ↑11 Nov 2025 01:21 am The Blues never destroyed Kyrou’s value.
Kyrou, single- handedly and bull-headedly destroyed his own value.
If he had listened to Berube, instead of …ignoring his Coach’s (bleep) COACHING….. he would he been an All-Star every year after he won fastest skater…
Why would we pay 3 million extra for the same offensive production?
Consider it chemotherapy.
We are seeing our team’s compete level on its death bed.
You must remove the malignancy.
Else, the heart of the Blues will stop beating entirely.
Quitting on plays is too contagious.
-
Harry York 37
- Forum User
- Posts: 2434
- Joined: 15 Oct 2019 08:36 am
Re: Kyrou Trade idea in conference
Nope.netboy65 wrote: ↑11 Nov 2025 02:43 amThe transition is complete. You’re full loco now.Harry York 37 wrote: ↑11 Nov 2025 01:21 am The Blues never destroyed Kyrou’s value.
Kyrou, single- handedly and bull-headedly destroyed his own value.
If he had listened to Berube, instead of …ignoring his Coach’s (bleep) COACHING….. he would he been an All-Star every year after he won fastest skater…
Why would we pay 3 million extra for the same offensive production?
Consider it chemotherapy.
We are seeing our team’s compete level on its death bed.
You must remove the malignancy.
Else, the heart of the Blues will stop beating entirely.
Quitting on plays is too contagious.
You are willfully blind.
-
ManitobaBlues
- Forum User
- Posts: 1057
- Joined: 21 Jan 2022 08:54 am
Re: Kyrou Trade idea in conference
you have been added to the list that follows Theograce on a daily basis..
-
ManitobaBlues
- Forum User
- Posts: 1057
- Joined: 21 Jan 2022 08:54 am
Re: Kyrou Trade idea in conference
Trading Kyrou in the same conference is stupid, but if Kyrou was smart and the Blues trade him he needs to go to the eastern conference as there are a lot more teams that play his style of game.