Daze - Do the math. Look at revenues, operating income, value of the franchise, debt as a % of value, probable interest rate, etc. Then look at interest dollars alone that are probably paid, not including any principal reduction. The interest payments are close to twice the operating income.
Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Rock, I’ve been banging this drum since the Carp extension….all this Revenue, Big Market [nonsense] is a canard. This real story explaining the Cards downturnrockondlouie wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:05 amI once tallied it up GF, Mo wasted nearly $500M on stupid free agent signings and extensions.Goldfan wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 09:39 amExactly, Cranny always chiming in with lower Rev…..big markets have so much moneyrockondlouie wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 08:47 amAnd now he finally has a POBO who (hopefully) will spend it wisely unlike the former POBO who wasted hundreds of millions of his payroll dollars.Cusecards wrote: ↑02 Nov 2025 12:39 pmI’m all for spending as long as it is done WISELY.Shady wrote: ↑02 Nov 2025 12:22 pm When allocating needed money to improve the Cardinals. Isn't he a billionaire? The Dodgers spent $300 million this season on salaries. They've won the last two World Series. The Cardinals haven't even been to the playoffs for the last three seasons. DeWitt needs to put 2 and 2 together.
You don’t just spend for the sake of spending!
Who do you propose they spend the $$ on?????
How about not spending as STUPID as MO did for YEARS….that’s the other side of the coin. 2 sides to the financial ledger
Fowler 70mil Wasted
Carp 45Mil Wasted
Miller 39mil Wasted
MIles 50mil Wasted
Matz 36mil Wasted
And Gray at 30mil for 5’10 180 guy who can’t pitch in the heat past his 35th birthday is insane
What 2-3 actual ALL-STAR could’ve been signed to long term contracts instead of wasted on several either NO return or very little return.
Has been internal management. As you state the waste of money for little to no production is off the charts.
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Busch III was completed and I assume financing in place for the 2006 season. The Foxsports local TV contract that everyone is crying over all the time was signed in 2018. So square that one up Cranny……Cranny wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:05 amDaze - Do the math. Look at revenues, operating income, value of the franchise, debt as a % of value, probable interest rate, etc. Then look at interest dollars alone that are probably paid, not including any principal reduction. The interest payments are close to twice the operating income.
And let us know how much tickets and concessions have gone up since 2006???
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 13493
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
I've been there too GF!Goldfan wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:10 amRock, I’ve been banging this drum since the Carp extension….all this Revenue, Big Market [nonsense] is a canard. This real story explaining the Cards downturnrockondlouie wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:05 amI once tallied it up GF, Mo wasted nearly $500M on stupid free agent signings and extensions.Goldfan wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 09:39 amExactly, Cranny always chiming in with lower Rev…..big markets have so much moneyrockondlouie wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 08:47 amAnd now he finally has a POBO who (hopefully) will spend it wisely unlike the former POBO who wasted hundreds of millions of his payroll dollars.Cusecards wrote: ↑02 Nov 2025 12:39 pmI’m all for spending as long as it is done WISELY.Shady wrote: ↑02 Nov 2025 12:22 pm When allocating needed money to improve the Cardinals. Isn't he a billionaire? The Dodgers spent $300 million this season on salaries. They've won the last two World Series. The Cardinals haven't even been to the playoffs for the last three seasons. DeWitt needs to put 2 and 2 together.
You don’t just spend for the sake of spending!
Who do you propose they spend the $$ on?????
How about not spending as STUPID as MO did for YEARS….that’s the other side of the coin. 2 sides to the financial ledger
Fowler 70mil Wasted
Carp 45Mil Wasted
Miller 39mil Wasted
MIles 50mil Wasted
Matz 36mil Wasted
And Gray at 30mil for 5’10 180 guy who can’t pitch in the heat past his 35th birthday is insane
What 2-3 actual ALL-STAR could’ve been signed to long term contracts instead of wasted on several either NO return or very little return.
Has been internal management. As you state the waste of money for little to no production is off the charts.
For years I've blasted BDWJr w/dozens of original threads, fingering him as being the main problem for keeping Mo around years past his expiration date and management malpractice.
Just glad he finally caught on.
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Their media carrier declared bankruptcy, short changing many of it's "customers". But the main principle you need to look at are the comparative cable contracts between the huge market teams, the mid market teams, and the small market teams.Goldfan wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:14 amBusch III was completed and I assume financing in place for the 2006 season. The Foxsports local TV contract that everyone is crying over all the time was signed in 2018. So square that one up Cranny……Cranny wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:05 amDaze - Do the math. Look at revenues, operating income, value of the franchise, debt as a % of value, probable interest rate, etc. Then look at interest dollars alone that are probably paid, not including any principal reduction. The interest payments are close to twice the operating income.
And let us know how much tickets and concessions have gone up since 2006???
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Is the local TV revenue LESS than in 2006???Cranny wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:18 amTheir media carrier declared bankruptcy, short changing many of it's "customers". But the main principle you need to look at are the comparative cable contracts between the huge market teams, the mid market teams, and the small market teams.Goldfan wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:14 amBusch III was completed and I assume financing in place for the 2006 season. The Foxsports local TV contract that everyone is crying over all the time was signed in 2018. So square that one up Cranny……Cranny wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:05 amDaze - Do the math. Look at revenues, operating income, value of the franchise, debt as a % of value, probable interest rate, etc. Then look at interest dollars alone that are probably paid, not including any principal reduction. The interest payments are close to twice the operating income.
And let us know how much tickets and concessions have gone up since 2006???
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
2006 local TV revenueCranny wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:18 amTheir media carrier declared bankruptcy, short changing many of it's "customers". But the main principle you need to look at are the comparative cable contracts between the huge market teams, the mid market teams, and the small market teams.Goldfan wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:14 amBusch III was completed and I assume financing in place for the 2006 season. The Foxsports local TV contract that everyone is crying over all the time was signed in 2018. So square that one up Cranny……Cranny wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:05 amDaze - Do the math. Look at revenues, operating income, value of the franchise, debt as a % of value, probable interest rate, etc. Then look at interest dollars alone that are probably paid, not including any principal reduction. The interest payments are close to twice the operating income.
And let us know how much tickets and concessions have gone up since 2006???
29mil
2025 local TV revenue
58mil
Which is down from the 75mil expected from old contract.
So in summation, the Local TV Rev has almost doubled since 2006(new stadium/financing) but is 17mil less than…
So 17mil is reason for all the crying……a Miles Mikolas
-
rockondlouie
- Forum User
- Posts: 13493
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
While true let's not cry "poor mouth" for BDWJr cranny.
The original deal would have paid around $75 million annually in later years, with the new deal reportedly in the $57-58 million range.
So they lost about $17M in yearly revenue which Dewitt has MORE THAN MADE up by slashing payroll from the $180M range in 2023, to what could be under $100M in 2026 after some high priced veteran are traded.
-
Imperial Capitalist
- Forum User
- Posts: 389
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
From Google AI:
In 2010, the Los Angeles Dodgers' cable rights fee was approximately $35.2 million, with the team receiving an advance of $25 million from Fox/Prime to help with financial difficulties. The total fee was part of an existing contract that was set to continue increasing annually until its final year in 2013.
The Dodgers' cable contract with Spectrum SportsNet LA provided approximately $334 million in revenue for 2025, based on the annual average of their 25-year, $8.35 billion deal. This deal, which runs through 2039, is set to provide the same annual amount as a previous year where figures are available, and the team receives the full payment regardless of subscriber losses.
It has increased by a factor of 10 over the course of 15 years.
Despite the fact I believe Dewitt has become too miserly with the check book, there is no way "normal" franchises can compete against revenue streams like that. Absent an unprecedented restructuring of baseball's economics, it points up the need for someone like Bloom to excel in ways we've not witnessed in STL in recent times.
In 2010, the Los Angeles Dodgers' cable rights fee was approximately $35.2 million, with the team receiving an advance of $25 million from Fox/Prime to help with financial difficulties. The total fee was part of an existing contract that was set to continue increasing annually until its final year in 2013.
The Dodgers' cable contract with Spectrum SportsNet LA provided approximately $334 million in revenue for 2025, based on the annual average of their 25-year, $8.35 billion deal. This deal, which runs through 2039, is set to provide the same annual amount as a previous year where figures are available, and the team receives the full payment regardless of subscriber losses.
It has increased by a factor of 10 over the course of 15 years.
Despite the fact I believe Dewitt has become too miserly with the check book, there is no way "normal" franchises can compete against revenue streams like that. Absent an unprecedented restructuring of baseball's economics, it points up the need for someone like Bloom to excel in ways we've not witnessed in STL in recent times.
-
BrockFloodMaris
- Forum User
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: 06 Aug 2019 16:06 pm
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
I don’t recall saying anything about there being a mystery surrounding the waning ticket sales. I agree with you that they are down due to poor on field product.Goldfan wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:02 amticket sales haven’t mysteriously waned over time……the Product has Been purposefully neglected which has caused the revenue to decrease.BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 10:53 amBill Dewitt Jr’s cash position is irrelevant to the Cards cash position. The Cards are a corporation, and BDW has several ownership partners. The Cards revenue from tv is approximately middle of the pack. They used to have a revenue advantage from ticket sales, but that has waned over time.Shady wrote: ↑02 Nov 2025 12:22 pm When allocating needed money to improve the Cardinals. Isn't he a billionaire? The Dodgers spent $300 million this season on salaries. They've won the last two World Series. The Cardinals haven't even been to the playoffs for the last three seasons. DeWitt needs to put 2 and 2 together.
Signing long term free agent contracts would and will hamstring the club with too many future financial commitments. One bad deal could tie up their finances for years.
In order to compete with the big spenders, the Cards need to draft a little better than they do, develop talent a little better than they do and assess talent a little better than they do. Incremental internal wins will add up over time to make a mid market team competitive with the big boys.
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
17mil is the reason BDW can’t make his stadium debt payment, reduced payroll by 75mil, decimated his top of league attendance, won’t sign star players, and has Cranny on herE crying poor every other postGoldfan wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:29 am2006 local TV revenueCranny wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:18 amTheir media carrier declared bankruptcy, short changing many of it's "customers". But the main principle you need to look at are the comparative cable contracts between the huge market teams, the mid market teams, and the small market teams.Goldfan wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:14 amBusch III was completed and I assume financing in place for the 2006 season. The Foxsports local TV contract that everyone is crying over all the time was signed in 2018. So square that one up Cranny……Cranny wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:05 amDaze - Do the math. Look at revenues, operating income, value of the franchise, debt as a % of value, probable interest rate, etc. Then look at interest dollars alone that are probably paid, not including any principal reduction. The interest payments are close to twice the operating income.
And let us know how much tickets and concessions have gone up since 2006???
29mil
2025 local TV revenue
58mil
Which is down from the 75mil expected from old contract.
So in summation, the Local TV Rev has almost doubled since 2006(new stadium/financing) but is 17mil less than…
So 17mil is reason for all the crying……a Miles Mikolas
Who believes this nonsense??? 17 MIL CAN’T BE THE REASON TO NOT HAVE A 180-190MIL PAYROLL. STOP THE NONSENSE.
-
BrockFloodMaris
- Forum User
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: 06 Aug 2019 16:06 pm
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Steve Cohen’s massive wealth, while impressive and certainly relevant for a discussion about the Mets finances, has nothing to do with the Cards ownership group.Shady wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 10:59 amSo you don't think Mets' owner. Steve Cohen, kicked in anything from his personal wealth to sign Sosa? Cohen has an estimated net worth of 21.3 Billion.BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 10:53 amBill Dewitt Jr’s cash position is irrelevant to the Cards cash position. The Cards are a corporation, and BDW has several ownership partners. The Cards revenue from tv is approximately middle of the pack. They used to have a revenue advantage from ticket sales, but that has waned over time.Shady wrote: ↑02 Nov 2025 12:22 pm When allocating needed money to improve the Cardinals. Isn't he a billionaire? The Dodgers spent $300 million this season on salaries. They've won the last two World Series. The Cardinals haven't even been to the playoffs for the last three seasons. DeWitt needs to put 2 and 2 together.
Signing long term free agent contracts would and will hamstring the club with too many future financial commitments. One bad deal could tie up their finances for years.
In order to compete with the big spenders, the Cards need to draft a little better than they do, develop talent a little better than they do and assess talent a little better than they do. Incremental internal wins will add up over time to make a mid market team competitive with the big boys.
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Cut costs, especially existing expensive long term contracts. Bring in a known rebuilder of teams....and sell the team. And yes, (I hope) the team remains in STL.
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
Won't sign star players? What about Ozuna, Goldy, Arenado, Gray, Contreras, etc.Goldfan wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:52 am17mil is the reason BDW can’t make his stadium debt payment, reduced payroll by 75mil, decimated his top of league attendance, won’t sign star players, and has Cranny on herE crying poor every other postGoldfan wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:29 am2006 local TV revenueCranny wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:18 amTheir media carrier declared bankruptcy, short changing many of it's "customers". But the main principle you need to look at are the comparative cable contracts between the huge market teams, the mid market teams, and the small market teams.Goldfan wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:14 amBusch III was completed and I assume financing in place for the 2006 season. The Foxsports local TV contract that everyone is crying over all the time was signed in 2018. So square that one up Cranny……Cranny wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 11:05 amDaze - Do the math. Look at revenues, operating income, value of the franchise, debt as a % of value, probable interest rate, etc. Then look at interest dollars alone that are probably paid, not including any principal reduction. The interest payments are close to twice the operating income.
And let us know how much tickets and concessions have gone up since 2006???
29mil
2025 local TV revenue
58mil
Which is down from the 75mil expected from old contract.
So in summation, the Local TV Rev has almost doubled since 2006(new stadium/financing) but is 17mil less than…
So 17mil is reason for all the crying……a Miles Mikolas
Who believes this nonsense??? 17 MIL CAN’T BE THE REASON TO NOT HAVE A 180-190MIL PAYROLL. STOP THE NONSENSE.
You really need to do the math to understand. Companies in a portfolio need to cash flow. That's how billionaires get to be billionaires.
Now let's look at the reality of the situation. When you buy a stock, you look at a return on investment in two ways - the cash return every year and the equity growth return every year. A good measure is around a 2% dividend/interest return and around a 3.5% for a total of 5.5% total return. So those who want to include the extraordinary value growth of the Cardinals over the Dewitt ownership years have a point. But the problem is liquidity. You can sell a stock easily. Not so with a franchise. So the principal growth is all on paper. It's great, but the business entity itself has to cash flow.
-
Rojo Johnson
- Forum User
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: 23 May 2024 23:25 pm
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
You got that right. Bill is against paying free agents lots of money. Instead, he favors paying borderline healthy, avg to below avg, over the hill players who people don’t want to pay to watch. Amirite, Miles? Scherzer, a hometown boy, couldn’t crack the code. Instead, we got 5-6 years of The Man Who Eats Lizards. Words never uttered by a young Cards fan, ‘Dad, I want to see Miles pitch; will you take me to the ballgame?”.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑02 Nov 2025 13:28 pm A large portion of the dry powder is still stashed away. Along with the Fox Sports TV deal signed several years ago. The one BDW claimed "would keep the team competitive for years to come."
DeWitt has always shied away from big free agents. He prefers a strange practice of overpaying mediocre to bad players.
Re: Why is DeWitt so cash-strapped?
"Dad, I want to see Goldschmidt play. He's a future Hall of Famer."Rojo Johnson wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 12:34 pmYou got that right. Bill is against paying free agents lots of money. Instead, he favors paying borderline healthy, avg to below avg, over the hill players who people don’t want to pay to watch. Amirite, Miles? Scherzer, a hometown boy, couldn’t crack the code. Instead, we got 5-6 years of The Man Who Eats Lizards. Words never uttered by a young Cards fan, ‘Dad, I want to see Miles pitch; will you take me to the ballgame?”.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑02 Nov 2025 13:28 pm A large portion of the dry powder is still stashed away. Along with the Fox Sports TV deal signed several years ago. The one BDW claimed "would keep the team competitive for years to come."
DeWitt has always shied away from big free agents. He prefers a strange practice of overpaying mediocre to bad players.
"Dad, I want to see Arenado play. He's a future Hall of Famer."
"Dad, I want to see Sonny Gray pitch. He came in 2nd in the Cy Young voting last season."