I mean, they probably make the playoffs, then who knows. They under performed on offense to be sure, but you really can't view that in a vacuum. They pitch better, keep games closer, hitters don't press as much and maybe score a few more runs. That's my opinion anyway.
What if the Cardinals had had the Dodgers starting pitching staff?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: What if the Cardinals had had the Dodgers starting pitching staff?
-
WoodyStrode
- Forum User
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 31 Aug 2024 23:06 pm
Re: What if the Cardinals had had the Dodgers starting pitching staff?
A look at how many games were lost to injury by the Dodgers starting pitching staff this season shows the historic job Dave Roberts did this season..
And the role players won the world series
And the role players won the world series
Re: What if the Cardinals had had the Dodgers starting pitching staff?
From what I saw in the World Series, the Dodgers could have used Donovan, Herrera and Burleson in their lineup, no doubt. Not sure where Herrera would have played, but Donovan and Burleson could have started in LF and RF. Especially vs RHP.makesnosense wrote: ↑02 Nov 2025 20:26 pmHilarious. Not one Cardinal everyday player starts for LA .
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1524
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: What if the Cardinals had had the Dodgers starting pitching staff?
For the umpteenth time, Burleson is unplayable defensively in RF:Shady wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 09:31 amFrom what I saw in the World Series, the Dodgers could have used Donovan, Herrera and Burleson in their lineup, no doubt. Not sure where Herrera would have played, but Donovan and Burleson could have started in LF and RF. Especially vs RHP.makesnosense wrote: ↑02 Nov 2025 20:26 pmHilarious. Not one Cardinal everyday player starts for LA .
IP: 734.2
DRS: -7
UZR: -5
OAA: -12
FRV: -11
That's all in the equivalent of just half a season. He's a traffic cone out there.
Re: What if the Cardinals had had the Dodgers starting pitching staff?
Yes, if the Cardinals added four legit SPs better than our best, they would have probably made the playoffs and been a real tough out in the post-season, as the Brewers found out in the NLCS.
I assume having Ohtani in our make believe rotation means we also get him as our DH.
I assume having Ohtani in our make believe rotation means we also get him as our DH.
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1524
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: What if the Cardinals had had the Dodgers starting pitching staff?
Yep, if only the Cardinals had been willing to just slightly expand their payroll, things could have gone differently . . .rbirules wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 10:01 am Yes, if the Cardinals added four legit SPs better than our best, they would have probably made the playoffs and been a real tough out in the post-season, as the Brewers found out in the NLCS.
I assume having Ohtani in our make believe rotation means we also get him as our DH.
Ohtani: 10yrs/$700mm
Yamamoto: 12/$325 plus a $50.6mm posting fee
Snell: 5/$182mm
Glasnow: 5/$136.5
Re: What if the Cardinals had had the Dodgers starting pitching staff?
Open DeWallet!NYCardsFan wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 10:18 amYep, if only the Cardinals had been willing to just slightly expand their payroll, things could have gone differently . . .rbirules wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 10:01 am Yes, if the Cardinals added four legit SPs better than our best, they would have probably made the playoffs and been a real tough out in the post-season, as the Brewers found out in the NLCS.
I assume having Ohtani in our make believe rotation means we also get him as our DH.
Ohtani: 10yrs/$700mm
Yamamoto: 12/$325 plus a $50.6mm posting fee
Snell: 5/$182mm
Glasnow: 5/$136.5
Re: What if the Cardinals had had the Dodgers starting pitching staff?
What if your aunt had .......
-
makesnosense
- Forum User
- Posts: 266
- Joined: 25 May 2024 06:39 am
Re: What if the Cardinals had had the Dodgers starting pitching staff?
LOL. Not a chance. Maybe AAA, not LA.Shady wrote: ↑03 Nov 2025 09:31 amFrom what I saw in the World Series, the Dodgers could have used Donovan, Herrera and Burleson in their lineup, no doubt. Not sure where Herrera would have played, but Donovan and Burleson could have started in LF and RF. Especially vs RHP.makesnosense wrote: ↑02 Nov 2025 20:26 pmHilarious. Not one Cardinal everyday player starts for LA .
Re: What if the Cardinals had had the Dodgers starting pitching staff?
For those that seem rather obtuse regarding the OP. My point is, a fabulous starting pitching staff is likely more essential to the outcome of a season than the manager.
Last edited by Shady on 03 Nov 2025 14:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: What if the Cardinals had had the Dodgers starting pitching staff?
It's rich the dolt who creates one stupid thread after another calls others obtuse. No sh-- the Cards would be better with the Dodgers' rotation, dumb-ss.
Re: What if the Cardinals had had the Dodgers starting pitching staff?
So why does a manager with a poor starting staff take so much heat? He has a "play the hand he's dealt".
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1524
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: What if the Cardinals had had the Dodgers starting pitching staff?
Clearly, that was not your “point” (however banal). You made no reference whatsoever to managers (or their essentiality) in your thread title or OP.
Furthermore, you suggested the Cardinals’ offense had as much “potential” (whatever that means) as the Dodgers’, even though the Dodgers had a 113/114 wRC+/OPS+ compared to the Cardinals’ 96/96.
This thread definitely does have a “point”—or, more accurately, a purpose—but as usual, that purpose has nothing to do with the nominal (pretextual) thread title or OP.
Last edited by NYCardsFan on 03 Nov 2025 15:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1524
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm