Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
Harper is a proven slugger. However, probably too expensive for the Cardinals.
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
Let me add
He’s 33 on tail end of career
Contract at 25 mill goes through 2032
He has NTC. No way he would go to cardinals.
Dumb, dumb dumb.
He’s 33 on tail end of career
Contract at 25 mill goes through 2032
He has NTC. No way he would go to cardinals.
Dumb, dumb dumb.
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
If the Cardinals are going to be really competitive. They need a slugger like Harper in the middle of the batting order. I look for possible solutions. Some others here just look to criticize. Real cool. Maybe they need to try to offer some bold solutions.
Last edited by Shady on 26 Oct 2025 16:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
Harper can still slug with the best of them. What's Sosa making? 25 million/year for Harper would be a bargain.
Last edited by Shady on 26 Oct 2025 16:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
11WSChamps
- Forum User
- Posts: 3421
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:35 pm
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
That boat sailed many moons ago.
No need to spend that kind of money now with a team years away from competing.
Also he has a no trade clause and I would think he'd want to go with a team serious about winning.
No need to spend that kind of money now with a team years away from competing.
Also he has a no trade clause and I would think he'd want to go with a team serious about winning.
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
He has money attached and well on the wrong side of 30. Maybe it wouldn't cost Wetherholt. I don't know I don't have access to BTV.
If the Phillies get to the point that they actually trade Harper it will be interesting to see what the deal looks like. Boston did not get a Wetherholt type prospect for Devers, and Devers has a lot more control left during his prime years than Harper does.
It's probably not the right trade for us.
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
No one is looking to criticize you....stop being a "professional victim"
You REFUSE to accept what the Front Office has said over and over again...."this coming season will be a rebuild year."
If you refuse to accept it and make the ridiculous threads like this, you'll get fair criticism.
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
If Bloom could land a couple quality starting pitchers by trade or FA. The Cardinals, with a Harper in the lineup, could be very competitive to win the division in '26.11WSChamps wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:49 pm That boat sailed many moons ago.
No need to spend that kind of money now with a team years away from competing.
Also he has a no trade clause and I would think he'd want to go with a team serious about winning.
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
You offer nothing but rebuttal. Weak. weak, weak.craviduce wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:52 pmNo one is looking to criticize you....stop being a "professional victim"
You REFUSE to accept what the Front Office has said over and over again...."this coming season will be a rebuild year."
If you refuse to accept it and make the ridiculous threads like this, you'll get fair criticism.
Last edited by Shady on 26 Oct 2025 16:58 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
deflection.... get better at this.Shady wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:55 pmYou offer nothing but rebuttal. Weak. weak weak.craviduce wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:52 pmNo one is looking to criticize you....stop being a "professional victim"
You REFUSE to accept what the Front Office has said over and over again...."this coming season will be a rebuild year."
If you refuse to accept it and make the ridiculous threads like this, you'll get fair criticism.
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
What's your realistic proposal for improving the Cardinals lineup in '26. Let's see it. Other than probably benching Burleson. LOLcraviduce wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:56 pmdeflection.... get better at this.Shady wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:55 pmYou offer nothing but rebuttal. Weak. weak weak.craviduce wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:52 pmNo one is looking to criticize you....stop being a "professional victim"
You REFUSE to accept what the Front Office has said over and over again...."this coming season will be a rebuild year."
If you refuse to accept it and make the ridiculous threads like this, you'll get fair criticism.
![]()
Last edited by Shady on 26 Oct 2025 17:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
What part of "Rebuild in 2026" can you not understand or cannot accept?Shady wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:57 pmWhat's your realistic proposal for improving the Cardinals in '26. Let's see it.craviduce wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:56 pmdeflection.... get better at this.Shady wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:55 pmYou offer nothing but rebuttal. Weak. weak weak.craviduce wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:52 pmNo one is looking to criticize you....stop being a "professional victim"
You REFUSE to accept what the Front Office has said over and over again...."this coming season will be a rebuild year."
If you refuse to accept it and make the ridiculous threads like this, you'll get fair criticism.
![]()
Jatalk was right above "dumb, dumb, dumb"
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
Wasn't '25 supposed to be a "rebuild"? Attendance and interest is wavering. It's time for better results in '26.craviduce wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:59 pmWhat part of "Rebuild in 2026" can you not understand or cannot accept?Shady wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:57 pmWhat's your realistic proposal for improving the Cardinals in '26. Let's see it.craviduce wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:56 pmdeflection.... get better at this.Shady wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:55 pmYou offer nothing but rebuttal. Weak. weak weak.craviduce wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:52 pmNo one is looking to criticize you....stop being a "professional victim"
You REFUSE to accept what the Front Office has said over and over again...."this coming season will be a rebuild year."
If you refuse to accept it and make the ridiculous threads like this, you'll get fair criticism.
![]()
Jatalk was right above "dumb, dumb, dumb"
Re: Would Cardinals give Wetherholt in exchange for Harper?
okay....make sure you tell Bloom and Dewitt when you meet with them.Shady wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 17:01 pmWasn't '25 supposed to be a "rebuild"? Attendance and interest is wavering. It's time for better results in '26.craviduce wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:59 pmWhat part of "Rebuild in 2026" can you not understand or cannot accept?Shady wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:57 pmWhat's your realistic proposal for improving the Cardinals in '26. Let's see it.craviduce wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:56 pmdeflection.... get better at this.Shady wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:55 pmYou offer nothing but rebuttal. Weak. weak weak.craviduce wrote: ↑26 Oct 2025 16:52 pmNo one is looking to criticize you....stop being a "professional victim"
You REFUSE to accept what the Front Office has said over and over again...."this coming season will be a rebuild year."
If you refuse to accept it and make the ridiculous threads like this, you'll get fair criticism.
![]()
Jatalk was right above "dumb, dumb, dumb"
