Against a team riding a five game win streak...
Colten ellis
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
- 
				STL fan in MN
 - Forum User
 - Posts: 2684
 - Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
 
Re: Colten ellis
Maybe. But probably not if I’m being honest. Ellis is the toast of the town today but there’s still really no path for him in Buffalo. UPL is their starter and Lyon has more than held his own with a .924 SV% in his 6 starts. UPL would have to do fantastically bad in his rehab starts for them to consider making a move to keep Ellis IMO.
The bigger risk may be some other team wanting Ellis. If Buffalo is eventually forced to put Ellis back on waivers, I could see another team putting in a claim on him, thinking he’d be a better option than their current #2. Especially if Ellis gets another start or two and continues to do well.
- 
				BalotelliMassive
 - Forum User
 - Posts: 1026
 - Joined: 24 May 2024 10:31 am
 
Re: Colten ellis
I could see them dangling him for a pick if he's the odd man out.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:06 amMaybe. But probably not if I’m being honest. Ellis is the toast of the town today but there’s still really no path for him in Buffalo. UPL is their starter and Lyon has more than held his own with a .924 SV% in his 6 starts. UPL would have to do fantastically bad in his rehab starts for them to consider making a move to keep Ellis IMO.
The bigger risk may be some other team wanting Ellis. If Buffalo is eventually forced to put Ellis back on waivers, I could see another team putting in a claim on him, thinking he’d be a better option than their current #2. Especially if Ellis gets another start or two and continues to do well.
- 
				son_of_foolsgold
 - Forum User
 - Posts: 2920
 - Joined: 12 Dec 2018 17:52 pm
 
Re: Colten ellis
My understanding is if Buffalo waives Ellis the Blues have priority over any other team wanting to claim him...but that would just be putting us in the same spot as before. What we really ought to do is get Ellis back and trade Binnington.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:06 amMaybe. But probably not if I’m being honest. Ellis is the toast of the town today but there’s still really no path for him in Buffalo. UPL is their starter and Lyon has more than held his own with a .924 SV% in his 6 starts. UPL would have to do fantastically bad in his rehab starts for them to consider making a move to keep Ellis IMO.
The bigger risk may be some other team wanting Ellis. If Buffalo is eventually forced to put Ellis back on waivers, I could see another team putting in a claim on him, thinking he’d be a better option than their current #2. Especially if Ellis gets another start or two and continues to do well.
- 
				STL fan in MN
 - Forum User
 - Posts: 2684
 - Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
 
Re: Colten ellis
If the Blues get Ellis back they’d be the only team able to send him to the minors without him again going throw waivers. They’d have to be the only team to put in a claim for him though.son_of_foolsgold wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:18 amMy understanding is if Buffalo waives Ellis the Blues have priority over any other team wanting to claim him...but that would just be putting us in the same spot as before. What we really ought to do is get Ellis back and trade Binnington.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:06 amMaybe. But probably not if I’m being honest. Ellis is the toast of the town today but there’s still really no path for him in Buffalo. UPL is their starter and Lyon has more than held his own with a .924 SV% in his 6 starts. UPL would have to do fantastically bad in his rehab starts for them to consider making a move to keep Ellis IMO.
The bigger risk may be some other team wanting Ellis. If Buffalo is eventually forced to put Ellis back on waivers, I could see another team putting in a claim on him, thinking he’d be a better option than their current #2. Especially if Ellis gets another start or two and continues to do well.
They’re absolutely not trading Binnington. It’s a waste of time even considering it IMO.
- 
				STL fan in MN
 - Forum User
 - Posts: 2684
 - Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
 
Re: Colten ellis
Maybe. Perhaps his value has now increased enough to get a late round pick. A lot of teams would probably see it as the same scenario as when the Blues had him - the team with Ellis has virtually no leverage as they pretty much have to get rid of one of their 3 goalies. A team could just pluck Ellis off waivers for free (small monetary price but no actual assets). But agree that I could see a team willing to trade a late pick for Ellis as that would guarantee them the player and them not be left to the chances of the waiver wire.BalotelliMassive wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:13 amI could see them dangling him for a pick if he's the odd man out.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:06 amMaybe. But probably not if I’m being honest. Ellis is the toast of the town today but there’s still really no path for him in Buffalo. UPL is their starter and Lyon has more than held his own with a .924 SV% in his 6 starts. UPL would have to do fantastically bad in his rehab starts for them to consider making a move to keep Ellis IMO.
The bigger risk may be some other team wanting Ellis. If Buffalo is eventually forced to put Ellis back on waivers, I could see another team putting in a claim on him, thinking he’d be a better option than their current #2. Especially if Ellis gets another start or two and continues to do well.
Re: Colten ellis
Kidding, correct?son_of_foolsgold wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:18 am My understanding is if Buffalo waives Ellis the Blues have priority over any other team wanting to claim him...but that would just be putting us in the same spot as before. What we really ought to do is get Ellis back and trade Binnington.
Re: Colten ellis
I kind of feel for Ellis. He needs to play, so hopefully the situation gets cleared up and he can start more games than one every 2-3 weeks, for his sake.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:23 amIf the Blues get Ellis back they’d be the only team able to send him to the minors without him again going throw waivers. They’d have to be the only team to put in a claim for him though.son_of_foolsgold wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:18 amMy understanding is if Buffalo waives Ellis the Blues have priority over any other team wanting to claim him...but that would just be putting us in the same spot as before. What we really ought to do is get Ellis back and trade Binnington.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:06 amMaybe. But probably not if I’m being honest. Ellis is the toast of the town today but there’s still really no path for him in Buffalo. UPL is their starter and Lyon has more than held his own with a .924 SV% in his 6 starts. UPL would have to do fantastically bad in his rehab starts for them to consider making a move to keep Ellis IMO.
The bigger risk may be some other team wanting Ellis. If Buffalo is eventually forced to put Ellis back on waivers, I could see another team putting in a claim on him, thinking he’d be a better option than their current #2. Especially if Ellis gets another start or two and continues to do well.
They’re absolutely not trading Binnington. It’s a waste of time even considering it IMO.
- 
				callitwhatyouwant
 - Forum User
 - Posts: 3751
 - Joined: 12 Jan 2019 20:05 pm
 
Re: Colten ellis
I love the comments when the trolls say, "trade binner, trade Parayko, trade Kyrou etc etc etc." They want to trade those guys for no one. Then complain after the deal is done that the Blues are too good and need a 1D or a goal scorer or whatever. But they want to trade guys who are literally on their countries national team.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:23 amIf the Blues get Ellis back they’d be the only team able to send him to the minors without him again going throw waivers. They’d have to be the only team to put in a claim for him though.son_of_foolsgold wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:18 amMy understanding is if Buffalo waives Ellis the Blues have priority over any other team wanting to claim him...but that would just be putting us in the same spot as before. What we really ought to do is get Ellis back and trade Binnington.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:06 amMaybe. But probably not if I’m being honest. Ellis is the toast of the town today but there’s still really no path for him in Buffalo. UPL is their starter and Lyon has more than held his own with a .924 SV% in his 6 starts. UPL would have to do fantastically bad in his rehab starts for them to consider making a move to keep Ellis IMO.
The bigger risk may be some other team wanting Ellis. If Buffalo is eventually forced to put Ellis back on waivers, I could see another team putting in a claim on him, thinking he’d be a better option than their current #2. Especially if Ellis gets another start or two and continues to do well.
They’re absolutely not trading Binnington. It’s a waste of time even considering it IMO.
At the moment, there is 0 reason to trade Binner. If the Blues were to take some drastic shift in course and become a bottom feeder, than the idea of trading players who are valuable to 25 other teams becomes an option. There isn't a better defensive contract than Parayko's at the moment. Binner is better now than he has ever been as far as expected output in a regular season game. Kyrou is supposed to be a goal scorer, why would a team who needs goal scoring trade a goal scorer?
The trolls literally make no sense. But I guess that is why they are trolls. Lacking brain acumen.
- 
				STL fan in MN
 - Forum User
 - Posts: 2684
 - Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
 
Re: Colten ellis
My guess is his situation will become more stable soon enough. Either he stays in Buffalo, another team claims him or he ends up back in Springfield…maybe eventually the Blues if one of Binnington/Hofer get injured.somni wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:43 amI kind of feel for Ellis. He needs to play, so hopefully the situation gets cleared up and he can start more games than one every 2-3 weeks, for his sake.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:23 amIf the Blues get Ellis back they’d be the only team able to send him to the minors without him again going throw waivers. They’d have to be the only team to put in a claim for him though.son_of_foolsgold wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:18 amMy understanding is if Buffalo waives Ellis the Blues have priority over any other team wanting to claim him...but that would just be putting us in the same spot as before. What we really ought to do is get Ellis back and trade Binnington.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:06 amMaybe. But probably not if I’m being honest. Ellis is the toast of the town today but there’s still really no path for him in Buffalo. UPL is their starter and Lyon has more than held his own with a .924 SV% in his 6 starts. UPL would have to do fantastically bad in his rehab starts for them to consider making a move to keep Ellis IMO.
The bigger risk may be some other team wanting Ellis. If Buffalo is eventually forced to put Ellis back on waivers, I could see another team putting in a claim on him, thinking he’d be a better option than their current #2. Especially if Ellis gets another start or two and continues to do well.
They’re absolutely not trading Binnington. It’s a waste of time even considering it IMO.
- 
				IsDurbanodoingtime
 - Forum User
 - Posts: 669
 - Joined: 23 May 2024 16:17 pm
 
Re: Colten ellis
If you look at the tandems around the league and the teams where you could see Ellis potentially slot in as the second (if Buffalo decides to waive him)-- 
Anaheim -- Mrazek ; Nashville - Annunen; Chicago - Soderblom ; Calgary - Prosetsov ; Philadelphia - Ersson. Very likely that all these backups would pass through waivers. Not a high risk move to pick up Ellis on waivers and see how it goes. The more and more this plays out -- I just do not see him coming back to the Blues organization.
			
			
									
									
						Anaheim -- Mrazek ; Nashville - Annunen; Chicago - Soderblom ; Calgary - Prosetsov ; Philadelphia - Ersson. Very likely that all these backups would pass through waivers. Not a high risk move to pick up Ellis on waivers and see how it goes. The more and more this plays out -- I just do not see him coming back to the Blues organization.
- 
				BalotelliMassive
 - Forum User
 - Posts: 1026
 - Joined: 24 May 2024 10:31 am
 
Re: Colten ellis
Chicago has too many goalies already. Soderblom is already NHL tested.IsDurbanodoingtime wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 11:17 am If you look at the tandems around the league and the teams where you could see Ellis potentially slot in as the second (if Buffalo decides to waive him)--
Anaheim -- Mrazek ; Nashville - Annunen; Chicago - Soderblom ; Calgary - Prosetsov ; Philadelphia - Ersson. Very likely that all these backups would pass through waivers. Not a high risk move to pick up Ellis on waivers and see how it goes. The more and more this plays out -- I just do not see him coming back to the Blues organization.
Anaheim should be all over it.
Re: Colten ellis
upl is a default starter not a starter. he has a carrgaa over 3 and sv% under .900 and .887 last year. its been .892 or lower in 2 of his 3 full seaspns. his goals saved above average was -19.9 last year and -14.1 3 years ago. upl is by no means as secure in his spot as you are acting. hes among worst goalies in the league.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:06 amMaybe. But probably not if I’m being honest. Ellis is the toast of the town today but there’s still really no path for him in Buffalo. UPL is their starter and Lyon has more than held his own with a .924 SV% in his 6 starts. UPL would have to do fantastically bad in his rehab starts for them to consider making a move to keep Ellis IMO.
The bigger risk may be some other team wanting Ellis. If Buffalo is eventually forced to put Ellis back on waivers, I could see another team putting in a claim on him, thinking he’d be a better option than their current #2. Especially if Ellis gets another start or two and continues to do well.
					Last edited by Wattage on 23 Oct 2025 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
									
			
									
						- 
				son_of_foolsgold
 - Forum User
 - Posts: 2920
 - Joined: 12 Dec 2018 17:52 pm
 
Re: Colten ellis
Nope...there are many reasons to do so, although we will not get as much for him as we would have 2 years ago.blues2112 wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:34 amKidding, correct?son_of_foolsgold wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:18 am My understanding is if Buffalo waives Ellis the Blues have priority over any other team wanting to claim him...but that would just be putting us in the same spot as before. What we really ought to do is get Ellis back and trade Binnington.
- 
				STL fan in MN
 - Forum User
 - Posts: 2684
 - Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
 
Re: Colten ellis
He’d still have to be drastically bad for them to trade him and keep Ellis instead.Wattage wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 11:57 amupl is a default starter not a starter. he has a carrgaa over 3 and sv% under .900 and .887 last year. its been .892 or lower in 2 of his 3 full seaspns. his goals saved above average was -19.9 last year and -14.1 3 years ago. upl is by no means as secure in his spot as you are acting. hes among worst goalies in the league.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:06 amMaybe. But probably not if I’m being honest. Ellis is the toast of the town today but there’s still really no path for him in Buffalo. UPL is their starter and Lyon has more than held his own with a .924 SV% in his 6 starts. UPL would have to do fantastically bad in his rehab starts for them to consider making a move to keep Ellis IMO.
The bigger risk may be some other team wanting Ellis. If Buffalo is eventually forced to put Ellis back on waivers, I could see another team putting in a claim on him, thinking he’d be a better option than their current #2. Especially if Ellis gets another start or two and continues to do well.
Re: Colten ellis
One comment and two questions.son_of_foolsgold wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 11:58 amNope...there are many reasons to do so, although we will not get as much for him as we would have 2 years ago.blues2112 wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:34 amKidding, correct?son_of_foolsgold wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025 10:18 am My understanding is if Buffalo waives Ellis the Blues have priority over any other team wanting to claim him...but that would just be putting us in the same spot as before. What we really ought to do is get Ellis back and trade Binnington.
Comment: Bennington was winning goalie at Four Nations and probably/maybe starting for Team Canada.
How could his value be higher?
What are the "many reasons to do so"?