seattleblue wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 11:09 am
Old_Goat wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025 10:48 am
theograce wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 18:11 pm
Although he’s only had a cup of coffee, he needs to learn how to impact the game when not hitting the scoresheet. Did he have any of that in him before?
He looks intimidated.
He looked scared in the Jets series too.
He doesn't look scared nor intimidated. A good example of those would be Petro backing away from Joe Thornton after he nearly ended David Perron's career with the head shot after exiting the penalty box as well as Petro cowering from Jamie Benn when he sat on Petro's face.
Snuggerud hangs around the net knowing that he could get hammered, that's why he scores on rebounds. Petro avoided protecting the crease and only resorted to dangerous swinging of a 4 foot long stick to injure opponents at a safer distance for him.
Bleeder did a lot of trolling for a long time, zero of it involving me because I wasn't posting here, but I observed he was trying to find ways to end it/call it quits and found that difficult, but he managed to get people to say this stuff about Petro, and it cracked the door open. Because to someone like me I see the total bad faith in this reply and so it acts as an illustration that everybody doing Petro ridicule is
also acting in bad faith, not just the official story where one guy is bad and the torchbearers are good. That allowed me to see him as a frustrated contrarian willing to battle 15 people online, maybe in dirty ways, but it is this constant way you guys have of ridiculing Alex Pietrangelo, who was a magnificent player for this franchise in actuality, is what made me treat him like a person instead of a troll, right from the outset. I chose to do it. That very first conversation I had with him where you were all convinced I was him was a HELL of a lot more dicey than you realize. Only he and I (and the handful of dual site posters who knew immediately those first few weeks before this happened that I was not him) realize it. It could have gone sideways but I refused to let it. I understood I didn't want to be consumed by back and forth, because if he and I wanted to find hard differences we can find them ... all of us can do that if we put our attention there. But why? There's so much of it everywhere already. It's common, it's a boring waste of time and patterns of attention. I knew by the way before I chose to interact, that I was going to run afoul of the people who are furious with the guy, for a long time. But in order to contribute successfully I needed to do it. In context, someone like MN (decades of mutual respect) and kimzey (decades of interaction & mutual frustration) can appreciate the thought that went into this choice. I actually figured I could build bridges of reasonability to talk to a person who clearly puts a ton of attention on hockey and talking about it, that's what we do here in this space. The other guy, the smell of divorced dad, who I have chosen a whole different tactic with, that is not what we have, there is no attention on hockey that's genuine there.
I appreciate your reply. You make very good points, and in particular the difference between the two most provocative posters, in that this one does offer good and fair insight many times. So, I'll accept the opinion that my reply was likely not a completely accurate interpretation of Petro's value and play, and won't argue about characterizing it as bad faith reply.
However, multiple incidents (not by you) of characterizing the citizens/fans of this City in a derogatory manner, ignorantly utilizing what is indeed considered by some as an ethnic slur in the process, and spreading rumors about people, twisting the narrative, or telling anyone "so what you are really saying is...," mocking someone whom has struggled with addiction, or impugning the character of someone whom has paid their debt to society for a poor judgment & resulting harmful act. Those are not just differences of opinion, but are intolerable and not to be ignored.
For the record, I have never indicated nor thought that you nor anyone else is also some other poster. So, no I am not in your category of "you all were convinced." That's okay, I can understand your point and why you worded it that way. I've followed this forum since it was first started, possibly before some on here were even born? I would see references to a "Bleedr," etc., had no idea what people were talking about (still don't know), and move on. I would read the back & forth of various posters. I had no idea who/how/why of the background in some of the dialogue. I figured in some cases they were guys in the St. Louis area whom knew each other from playing either school or senior men's hockey. I've never bothered to try and figure out whom they are, or are not. When my bucket becomes full with their [nonsense], then I just pour it right back onto them.
I do want to make sure that you know I have a high opinion of your postings. I sincerely do appreciate the thought that you put into your above post, and I have taken your assessment of my reply to heart.