A moniker invalidates facts, Verson?theograce wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 17:54 pmSo you believe a Blues fan named Bluenuthead at face valueblues2112 wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 17:52 pmThank you, bluetuneheadbluetunehead wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 15:31 pmThat website cited anonymous sources in their original story.ManitobaBlues wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 08:33 am Summer trade rumors: In July 2025, several hockey reporters claimed Kyrou was willing to waive his no-trade clause for a move to the Canadiens. A specific report in French Canadian media outlet DansLesCoulisses indicated his response to his agent was, "Absolutely yes!".
So no, there is no source for that. A Montreal fan site made it up.
Laughing
Kyrou
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
Re: Kyrou
Re: Kyrou
No, I’m encouraging you to educate yourself on your own and form your own opinion.blues2112 wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 18:00 pmA moniker invalidates facts, Verson?theograce wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 17:54 pmSo you believe a Blues fan named Bluenuthead at face valueblues2112 wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 17:52 pmThank you, bluetuneheadbluetunehead wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 15:31 pmThat website cited anonymous sources in their original story.ManitobaBlues wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 08:33 am Summer trade rumors: In July 2025, several hockey reporters claimed Kyrou was willing to waive his no-trade clause for a move to the Canadiens. A specific report in French Canadian media outlet DansLesCoulisses indicated his response to his agent was, "Absolutely yes!".
So no, there is no source for that. A Montreal fan site made it up.
Laughing
There’s lots to read my man
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm
Re: Kyrou
You believe literally any source online that validates your views. I’m not questioning Seravalli saying that the Blues were open to moving Kyrou (though LeBrun questioned if they really wanted to move him or were just kicking the tires). Nobody reputable was putting out anything about how Kyrou was chomping at the bit to go to Montreal. That came unattributed via a single Montreal sports fan site, and then other similarly sourceless fan blogs ran with it. Nobody ever put a name to that quote. Why on earth would Kyrou’s agent ever waste his time commenting on a single anonymous quote? You just eat it up because it’s what you want to read.theograce wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 15:48 pmTop Sources stated like Seravelli stated that the Blues wanted to move on from Kyrou and that contract. This has been ongoing.bluetunehead wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 15:31 pmThat website cited anonymous sources in their original story.ManitobaBlues wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 08:33 am Summer trade rumors: In July 2025, several hockey reporters claimed Kyrou was willing to waive his no-trade clause for a move to the Canadiens. A specific report in French Canadian media outlet DansLesCoulisses indicated his response to his agent was, "Absolutely yes!".
So no, there is no source for that. A Montreal fan site made it up.
Neither Kyrou’s agent or Kyrou refuted (that I’m aware of) what was being reported being stated by Kyrou/agent.
It’s most likely true. If you were being treated poorly by your organization and always thought they were looking to get rid of you…I’m sure you’d be pumped to be there. Right?
Re: Kyrou
IIRC a lot of the reputable folks glommed on to what the fan forum site spit outbluetunehead wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 09:16 amYou believe literally any source online that validates your views. I’m not questioning Seravalli saying that the Blues were open to moving Kyrou (though LeBrun questioned if they really wanted to move him or were just kicking the tires). Nobody reputable was putting out anything about how Kyrou was chomping at the bit to go to Montreal. That came unattributed via a single Montreal sports fan site, and then other similarly sourceless fan blogs ran with it. Nobody ever put a name to that quote. Why on earth would Kyrou’s agent ever waste his time commenting on a single anonymous quote? You just eat it up because it’s what you want to read.theograce wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 15:48 pmTop Sources stated like Seravelli stated that the Blues wanted to move on from Kyrou and that contract. This has been ongoing.bluetunehead wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 15:31 pmThat website cited anonymous sources in their original story.ManitobaBlues wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 08:33 am Summer trade rumors: In July 2025, several hockey reporters claimed Kyrou was willing to waive his no-trade clause for a move to the Canadiens. A specific report in French Canadian media outlet DansLesCoulisses indicated his response to his agent was, "Absolutely yes!".
So no, there is no source for that. A Montreal fan site made it up.
Neither Kyrou’s agent or Kyrou refuted (that I’m aware of) what was being reported being stated by Kyrou/agent.
It’s most likely true. If you were being treated poorly by your organization and always thought they were looking to get rid of you…I’m sure you’d be pumped to be there. Right?
Re: Kyrou
Point. Game. Match.bluetunehead wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 09:16 amYou believe literally any source online that validates your views. I’m not questioning Seravalli saying that the Blues were open to moving Kyrou (though LeBrun questioned if they really wanted to move him or were just kicking the tires). Nobody reputable was putting out anything about how Kyrou was chomping at the bit to go to Montreal. That came unattributed via a single Montreal sports fan site, and then other similarly sourceless fan blogs ran with it. Nobody ever put a name to that quote. Why on earth would Kyrou’s agent ever waste his time commenting on a single anonymous quote? You just eat it up because it’s what you want to read.theograce wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 15:48 pmTop Sources stated like Seravelli stated that the Blues wanted to move on from Kyrou and that contract. This has been ongoing.bluetunehead wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 15:31 pmThat website cited anonymous sources in their original story.ManitobaBlues wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 08:33 am Summer trade rumors: In July 2025, several hockey reporters claimed Kyrou was willing to waive his no-trade clause for a move to the Canadiens. A specific report in French Canadian media outlet DansLesCoulisses indicated his response to his agent was, "Absolutely yes!".
So no, there is no source for that. A Montreal fan site made it up.
Neither Kyrou’s agent or Kyrou refuted (that I’m aware of) what was being reported being stated by Kyrou/agent.
It’s most likely true. If you were being treated poorly by your organization and always thought they were looking to get rid of you…I’m sure you’d be pumped to be there. Right?
Highlights of this beat down at 11.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5828
- Joined: 20 Dec 2020 10:49 am
Re: Kyrou
everybody's talking about itblues2112 wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 09:34 amPoint. Game. Match.bluetunehead wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 09:16 amYou believe literally any source online that validates your views. I’m not questioning Seravalli saying that the Blues were open to moving Kyrou (though LeBrun questioned if they really wanted to move him or were just kicking the tires). Nobody reputable was putting out anything about how Kyrou was chomping at the bit to go to Montreal. That came unattributed via a single Montreal sports fan site, and then other similarly sourceless fan blogs ran with it. Nobody ever put a name to that quote. Why on earth would Kyrou’s agent ever waste his time commenting on a single anonymous quote? You just eat it up because it’s what you want to read.theograce wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 15:48 pmTop Sources stated like Seravelli stated that the Blues wanted to move on from Kyrou and that contract. This has been ongoing.bluetunehead wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 15:31 pmThat website cited anonymous sources in their original story.ManitobaBlues wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 08:33 am Summer trade rumors: In July 2025, several hockey reporters claimed Kyrou was willing to waive his no-trade clause for a move to the Canadiens. A specific report in French Canadian media outlet DansLesCoulisses indicated his response to his agent was, "Absolutely yes!".
So no, there is no source for that. A Montreal fan site made it up.
Neither Kyrou’s agent or Kyrou refuted (that I’m aware of) what was being reported being stated by Kyrou/agent.
It’s most likely true. If you were being treated poorly by your organization and always thought they were looking to get rid of you…I’m sure you’d be pumped to be there. Right?
Highlights of this beat down at 11.
Re: Kyrou
That was the rumor. And some thought Neighbours name could've been mentioned.bluetunehead wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 15:32 pmWhat has been most likely from the start was that the proposed deal was Kyrou for Reinbacher and one or both sides got cold feet so they pivoted to Bolduc and Mailloux.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 14:45 pmThere was a ton of smoke about a bigger deal in the works involving Kyrou and Mailloux's name was mentioned there. At the time, I believe I said I knew it was bull[shirt] because no way would the Blues care about getting Mailloux in a deal involving Kyrou. Now I learn the Blues have been enamored with him for some time...so it was probably true. Not sure what the other pieces were but it seems they were set on getting LM. Can't say I understand what they saw in him...ManitobaBlues wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 14:24 pmthat would be the worst trade in Blues history or even in the NHL.BalotelliMassive wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 12:16 pmThe word on the Montreal board is that Kyrou was the main target for Maalox....they're pretty happy that it didn't happen.ManitobaBlues wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 08:33 am Summer trade rumors: In July 2025, several hockey reporters claimed Kyrou was willing to waive his no-trade clause for a move to the Canadiens. A specific report in French Canadian media outlet DansLesCoulisses indicated his response to his agent was, "Absolutely yes!".
It's all rumors, so we don't know any specifics.
There is some concern in Montreal about Reinbacher and his injuries. He had knee injury last year and he's out now with a hand fracture.
Re: Kyrou
I believe that you are a smug "know-it-all," but in reality you are only smug.theograce wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 11:41 amTell me what you believebluetunehead wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 09:16 am You believe literally any source online that validates your views.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2288
- Joined: 15 Oct 2019 08:36 am
Re: Kyrou
You know how badly I wanted Kyrou gone, but, even so... when I checked the sources, I could not run with it for long.netboy65 wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 09:19 amIIRC a lot of the reputable folks glommed on to what the fan forum site spit outbluetunehead wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 09:16 amYou believe literally any source online that validates your views. I’m not questioning Seravalli saying that the Blues were open to moving Kyrou (though LeBrun questioned if they really wanted to move him or were just kicking the tires). Nobody reputable was putting out anything about how Kyrou was chomping at the bit to go to Montreal. That came unattributed via a single Montreal sports fan site, and then other similarly sourceless fan blogs ran with it. Nobody ever put a name to that quote. Why on earth would Kyrou’s agent ever waste his time commenting on a single anonymous quote? You just eat it up because it’s what you want to read.theograce wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 15:48 pmTop Sources stated like Seravelli stated that the Blues wanted to move on from Kyrou and that contract. This has been ongoing.bluetunehead wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 15:31 pmThat website cited anonymous sources in their original story.ManitobaBlues wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 08:33 am Summer trade rumors: In July 2025, several hockey reporters claimed Kyrou was willing to waive his no-trade clause for a move to the Canadiens. A specific report in French Canadian media outlet DansLesCoulisses indicated his response to his agent was, "Absolutely yes!".
So no, there is no source for that. A Montreal fan site made it up.
Neither Kyrou’s agent or Kyrou refuted (that I’m aware of) what was being reported being stated by Kyrou/agent.
It’s most likely true. If you were being treated poorly by your organization and always thought they were looking to get rid of you…I’m sure you’d be pumped to be there. Right?
I don't doubt the Organization would have moved him in a heartbeat- for fair return.
Nobody wanted to give a fair return as they all saw the Winnipeg Series. Even after factoring in his "Bargain" Contract.
Hence, Kyrou is on the third line for a refresher course on moving the puck North.
I would not doubt that Holloway did "The Crying Game " upchuck when he watched his linemate flinch for four straight games.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 448
- Joined: 23 Aug 2025 17:34 pm
Re: Kyrou
Should've traded him (and Buchnevich before extending him) and kept Bolduc....like I said.
Dumb-dumb-dumb
Dumb-dumb-dumb
Re: Kyrou
Truly, man, you're losing me on a lot. And I've respected your posts, while sometimes disagreeing. (Usually in silence.)Harry York 37 wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 19:04 pm You know how badly I wanted Kyrou gone, but, even so... when I checked the sources, I could not run with it for long.
I don't doubt the Organization would have moved him in a heartbeat- for fair return.
Nobody wanted to give a fair return as they all saw the Winnipeg Series. Even after factoring in his "Bargain" Contract.
Hence, Kyrou is on the third line for a refresher course on moving the puck North.
I would not doubt that Holloway did "The Crying Game " upchuck when he watched his linemate flinch for four straight games.
But postulating that Blues would have traded him, but no fair return; Kyrou third line as a refresher; and "Crying Game" comment is below you as a poster.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2288
- Joined: 15 Oct 2019 08:36 am
Re: Kyrou
blues2112 wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 19:37 pmTruly, man, you're losing me on a lot. And I've respected your posts, while sometimes disagreeing. (Usually in silence.)Harry York 37 wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 19:04 pm You know how badly I wanted Kyrou gone, but, even so... when I checked the sources, I could not run with it for long.
I don't doubt the Organization would have moved him in a heartbeat- for fair return.
Nobody wanted to give a fair return as they all saw the Winnipeg Series. Even after factoring in his "Bargain" Contract.
Hence, Kyrou is on the third line for a refresher course on moving the puck North.
I would not doubt that Holloway did "The Crying Game " upchuck when he watched his linemate flinch for four straight games.
But postulating that Blues would have traded him, but no fair return; Kyrou third line as a refresher; and "Crying Game" comment is below you as a poster.
I hit back too nasty sometimes, and I sometimes regret it.
The Crying Game upchuck was too far. I don’t know for sure how Holloway feels about Kyrou in the Winnipeg Series as he watched from a hospital or a rehab/recovery place. I picture Holloway eating himself up inside for being unable to compete and help his team win a close battle of a series and earn a huge upset. I suspect Kyrou’s showing horrified him.
Suddenly, our best line becomes our worst.
Is it Holloway has not yet fully recovered, mentally and physically, from such a rare and brutal injury? He is credited with 16 hits this year, which is darned good. His takeaways aren’t there yet, and his blocks are a tad low. He is not playing like he did the second half of last year.
When Kyrou gets a pass in the neutral zone in a rush, he often coughs it up with a poor pass or a terrible attempt to throw it in deep. I see far more plays that I would credit as giveaways than what is shown in the stats. Is Kyrou still having Logan Cooley flashbacks?
I do not know.
I do know that this once admirable line is a shell of its glory days, right now. Some time on the top line will be a tonic for Holloway, I believe. And, some time on a more simple North/South line might help Kyrou remember how simple the transition game can and should be.
My comment about no teams, after seeing the Winnipeg Series, would offer a fair return, even with Kyrou’s bargain contract, was pure speculation… and I could well be wrong about it.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2288
- Joined: 15 Oct 2019 08:36 am
Re: Kyrou
Umm, Logan Stanley flashbacks.
So many Logan’s in the NHL.
So many Logan’s in the NHL.
Re: Kyrou
If you choose to believe that, it’s your choice. However it’s not really based in realityHarry York 37 wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 19:04 pmYou know how badly I wanted Kyrou gone, but, even so... when I checked the sources, I could not run with it for long.netboy65 wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 09:19 amIIRC a lot of the reputable folks glommed on to what the fan forum site spit outbluetunehead wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025 09:16 amYou believe literally any source online that validates your views. I’m not questioning Seravalli saying that the Blues were open to moving Kyrou (though LeBrun questioned if they really wanted to move him or were just kicking the tires). Nobody reputable was putting out anything about how Kyrou was chomping at the bit to go to Montreal. That came unattributed via a single Montreal sports fan site, and then other similarly sourceless fan blogs ran with it. Nobody ever put a name to that quote. Why on earth would Kyrou’s agent ever waste his time commenting on a single anonymous quote? You just eat it up because it’s what you want to read.theograce wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 15:48 pmTop Sources stated like Seravelli stated that the Blues wanted to move on from Kyrou and that contract. This has been ongoing.bluetunehead wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 15:31 pmThat website cited anonymous sources in their original story.ManitobaBlues wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025 08:33 am Summer trade rumors: In July 2025, several hockey reporters claimed Kyrou was willing to waive his no-trade clause for a move to the Canadiens. A specific report in French Canadian media outlet DansLesCoulisses indicated his response to his agent was, "Absolutely yes!".
So no, there is no source for that. A Montreal fan site made it up.
Neither Kyrou’s agent or Kyrou refuted (that I’m aware of) what was being reported being stated by Kyrou/agent.
It’s most likely true. If you were being treated poorly by your organization and always thought they were looking to get rid of you…I’m sure you’d be pumped to be there. Right?
I don't doubt the Organization would have moved him in a heartbeat- for fair return.
Nobody wanted to give a fair return as they all saw the Winnipeg Series. Even after factoring in his "Bargain" Contract.
Hence, Kyrou is on the third line for a refresher course on moving the puck North.
I would not doubt that Holloway did "The Crying Game " upchuck when he watched his linemate flinch for four straight games.