Look at what NHLers are saying about Bolduc and Mailloux

[a smell of green grass]

"I expected it, and I'm happy to see that Zach is doing well. He's a young player rising in the NHL. He will probably score 20, 30, 40 goals in the future, and he will do it for another 10-15 years."

- Jonathan Marchessault

Oh wait. I can't find anybody saying anything about Mailloux. Maybe tomorrow.

[rcasher]

Now let's get Ja Rules thoughts on the situation.

[Backesdraft]

Boy this forum [fork]ing sucks now. Every [fork]ing day with this stupid [fork]ing bull[shirt]. Every. [fork]ing. Day.

[BalotelliMassive]

Now let's get Ja Rules thoughts on the situation.

This is Ja Rule reading an entry from the op's diary:

[Inglewood Jack]

Boy this forum [fork]ing sucks now. Every [fork]ing day with this stupid [fork]ing bull[shirt]. Every. [fork]ing. Day.

Ya think the guy would be happy when the Blues lose to increase the chance of that top 5 pick.... his schtick is old and smelly like a 40 year old dog urine stained carpet

[IsDurbanodoingtime]

Boy this forum [fork]ing sucks now. Every [fork]ing day with this stupid [fork]ing bull[shirt]. Every. [fork]ing. Day.

This. Same boring spam over and over.

[seattleblue]

we have a sad piece of [shirt] divorced dad in here every morning

in a world with nothing but people going out of their way to make it worse, this maggot gets up and this is the best he can do

[somni]

Boy this forum [fork]ing sucks now. Every [fork]ing day with this stupid [fork]ing bull[shirt]. Every. [fork]ing. Day.

This. Same boring spam over and over.

Agree. It sucks.

[Nublues69]

When logan turns it around, with the way he skates and with him looking a lil better every outing, I cant wait to turn this back on smellyass and all his other socks. Then he will be quiet for a few days.

[a smell of green grass]

Is it spam if it contains the essential truth?
Is it spam if it pertains to the Blues?
Is it spam if it can’t be refuted?

Don’t hate on me. I’m just the messenger.

Blame Army.

[2forDiving]

Is it spam if it contains the essential truth?
Is it spam if it pertains to the Blues?
Is it spam if it can’t be refuted?

Don’t hate on me. I’m just the messenger.

Blame Army.

In theory it isn’t true because you indicated it was a plural, and in fact, it was a singular player. One! And it could have been posted in one of the other 10,000 threads you have started with the same old, tired, outdated model. Get yourself a Sirius subscription and turn on the NHL Network. Nearly every week at some point one of the shows touches on your preferred model and it is debunked over and over. Then you can spam their emails with your points instead of littering this forum

[seattleblue]

Is it spam if it contains the essential truth?
Is it spam if it pertains to the Blues?
Is it spam if it can’t be refuted?

Don’t hate on me. I’m just the messenger.

Blame Army.

so you're just a pitiful jackass with no self control because Armstrong controls you? pitiful

[MiamiLaw]

When logan turns it around, with the way he skates and with him looking a lil better every outing, I cant wait to turn this back on smellyass and all his other socks. Then he will be quiet for a few days.

He's looking better every outing? He was a -4 last game and did absolutely nothing positive whatsoever. No issue with the rest but you can say it without including the objectively incorrect assertion that he's looking better.

[TheJackBurton]

When logan turns it around, with the way he skates and with him looking a lil better every outing, I cant wait to turn this back on smellyass and all his other socks. Then he will be quiet for a few days.

He's looking better every outing? He was a -4 last game and did absolutely nothing positive whatsoever. No issue with the rest but you can say it without including the objectively incorrect assertion that he's looking better.

I would like to know which goals he was on the ice for though. If it was the first or second, or both, those can't be placed on him anymore than he deserves a + for stepping on the ice when the Blues score.

I'm probably pretty dumb on this one, but is there a non pay site that shows who was on the ice when goals are scored?

[MiamiLaw]

When logan turns it around, with the way he skates and with him looking a lil better every outing, I cant wait to turn this back on smellyass and all his other socks. Then he will be quiet for a few days.

He's looking better every outing? He was a -4 last game and did absolutely nothing positive whatsoever. No issue with the rest but you can say it without including the objectively incorrect assertion that he's looking better.

I would like to know which goals he was on the ice for though. If it was the first or second, or both, those can't be placed on him anymore than he deserves a + for stepping on the ice when the Blues score.

I'm probably pretty dumb on this one, but is there a non pay site that shows who was on the ice when goals are scored?

Honestly, it was just a clusterf**k all night and I am sure he was on there for some weak ones by the goalers because who wasn't, but it isn't like the whole team was -4. And he absolutely was a major part of the Hawks 3rd goal at the beginning of the second (I believe it was that one) where Bedard schooled him.

In any event, the point is that is no way can you say he is looking better every game. That is just pure gaslighting.

[BluesDom]

The loser has 4 posts on Page 1. Every day same garbage.

Can you wait a month before you (buzz) and moan about the same stuff.

You have your point of view. Some agree with you. Most do not.
Stop spamming the board. Stop re-posting same thing each day.

Grow up and be a decent human.