Parekh vs Jiricek
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
a smell of green grass
- Forum User
- Posts: 1884
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Parekh vs Jiricek
While you ponder what Jiricek is eating in Eastern Canada today to gain an ounce, take a gander at Parekh on Calgary. He was drafted same year as our guy.
Thanks, Army.
Thanks, Army.
-
Mr.Snuggleupagus
- Forum User
- Posts: 492
- Joined: 23 Aug 2025 17:34 pm
Re: Parekh vs Jiricek
Yeah, well the Blues had to wait their turn to pick. Can't just skip over everyone you know.
-
a smell of green grass
- Forum User
- Posts: 1884
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: Parekh vs Jiricek
What we all know:Mr.Snuggleupagus wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 17:06 pm Yeah, well the Blues had to wait their turn to pick. Can't just skip over everyone you know.
- How the NHL draft works.
- Army doesn't want to select higher than 15 ever.
- Our draft picks take 3 years to mature, season, and gain weight.
What only some of us know:
- Defense Draft picks taken the same year as Jiricek are already playing significant roles in the NHL. Game 1, it was Buium. Today it was Parekh.
-
bluetunehead
- Forum User
- Posts: 1207
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm
Re: Parekh vs Jiricek
Eh to me Armstrong’s biggest miss was not drafting Jack Hughes. Just imagine our offense with him and Thomas down the middle. The Blues were in the driver seat for the #1 pick at midseason that year and then blew it…
-
Frank Underwood
- Forum User
- Posts: 685
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:02 pm
Re: Parekh vs Jiricek
A dark chapter in Blues history for sure!bluetunehead wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 18:55 pm Eh to me Armstrong’s biggest miss was not drafting Jack Hughes. Just imagine our offense with him and Thomas down the middle. The Blues were in the driver seat for the #1 pick at midseason that year and then blew it…
Re: Parekh vs Jiricek
Ha!bluetunehead wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 18:55 pm Eh to me Armstrong’s biggest miss was not drafting Jack Hughes. Just imagine our offense with him and Thomas down the middle. The Blues were in the driver seat for the #1 pick at midseason that year and then blew it…
My first reaction to the Subject was "Pariah vs Jerk?"
-
Mr.Snuggleupagus
- Forum User
- Posts: 492
- Joined: 23 Aug 2025 17:34 pm
Re: Parekh vs Jiricek
"Some of us know" those 2 players were more advanced, mature & NHL ready than Jiricek.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 18:20 pmWhat we all know:Mr.Snuggleupagus wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 17:06 pm Yeah, well the Blues had to wait their turn to pick. Can't just skip over everyone you know.
- How the NHL draft works.
- Army doesn't want to select higher than 15 ever.
- Our draft picks take 3 years to mature, season, and gain weight.
What only some of us know:
- Defense Draft picks taken the same year as Jiricek are already playing significant roles in the NHL. Game 1, it was Buium. Today it was Parekh.
"We all know" that's why they were picked higher. (For the record; I wanted Solberg)
-
Harry S Deals
- Forum User
- Posts: 1935
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Parekh vs Jiricek
Lol dumb (donkey) I thought Calgary was "putting on a show" in their home openerMr.Snuggleupagus wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 19:00 pm"Some of us know" those 2 players were more advanced, mature & NHL ready than Jiricek.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 18:20 pmWhat we all know:Mr.Snuggleupagus wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 17:06 pm Yeah, well the Blues had to wait their turn to pick. Can't just skip over everyone you know.
- How the NHL draft works.
- Army doesn't want to select higher than 15 ever.
- Our draft picks take 3 years to mature, season, and gain weight.
What only some of us know:
- Defense Draft picks taken the same year as Jiricek are already playing significant roles in the NHL. Game 1, it was Buium. Today it was Parekh.
"We all know" that's why they were picked higher. (For the record; I wanted Solberg)
-
Mr.Snuggleupagus
- Forum User
- Posts: 492
- Joined: 23 Aug 2025 17:34 pm
Re: Parekh vs Jiricek
What are you talking about Harry? This thread is about Jiricek, Parekh & the 2024 NHL draft.Harry S Deals wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 19:13 pmLol dumb (donkey) I thought Calgary was "putting on a show" in their home openerMr.Snuggleupagus wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 19:00 pm"Some of us know" those 2 players were more advanced, mature & NHL ready than Jiricek.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 18:20 pmWhat we all know:Mr.Snuggleupagus wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 17:06 pm Yeah, well the Blues had to wait their turn to pick. Can't just skip over everyone you know.
- How the NHL draft works.
- Army doesn't want to select higher than 15 ever.
- Our draft picks take 3 years to mature, season, and gain weight.
What only some of us know:
- Defense Draft picks taken the same year as Jiricek are already playing significant roles in the NHL. Game 1, it was Buium. Today it was Parekh.
"We all know" that's why they were picked higher. (For the record; I wanted Solberg)
Do you have Tourette syndrome Harry?
-
Harry S Deals
- Forum User
- Posts: 1935
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Parekh vs Jiricek
No your just another loud forum (bleep) most likely the same [shirt] different user name. All I hear is blah blah blahMr.Snuggleupagus wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 19:18 pmWhat are you talking about Harry? This thread is about Jiricek, Parekh & the 2024 NHL draft.Harry S Deals wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 19:13 pmLol dumb (donkey) I thought Calgary was "putting on a show" in their home openerMr.Snuggleupagus wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 19:00 pm"Some of us know" those 2 players were more advanced, mature & NHL ready than Jiricek.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 18:20 pmWhat we all know:Mr.Snuggleupagus wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 17:06 pm Yeah, well the Blues had to wait their turn to pick. Can't just skip over everyone you know.
- How the NHL draft works.
- Army doesn't want to select higher than 15 ever.
- Our draft picks take 3 years to mature, season, and gain weight.
What only some of us know:
- Defense Draft picks taken the same year as Jiricek are already playing significant roles in the NHL. Game 1, it was Buium. Today it was Parekh.
"We all know" that's why they were picked higher. (For the record; I wanted Solberg)
Do you have Tourette syndrome Harry?
-
Mr.Snuggleupagus
- Forum User
- Posts: 492
- Joined: 23 Aug 2025 17:34 pm
Re: Parekh vs Jiricek
Poor Harry; can't discuss hockey, stay on topic and resorts to name calling. Seek help Harry, I'm pulling for ya.Harry S Deals wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 21:52 pmNo your just another loud forum (bleep) most likely the same [shirt] different user name. All I hear is blah blah blahMr.Snuggleupagus wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 19:18 pm What are you talking about Harry? This thread is about Jiricek, Parekh & the 2024 NHL draft.
Do you have Tourette syndrome Harry?
Re: Parekh vs Jiricek
Not sure if you're implying the Blues should have drafted Parekh instead but Parekh was off the board already. He went #9 and the Blues picked at #16. Unfortunately Parekh wasn't available anymore by the time the Blues picked (he was drafted by Calgary). If he was, it's safe to say he would have been taken instead. There's a draft order and only way teams can pick higher is by trading, or by finishing lower in the standings. Some players also mature faster than others but doesn't mean they'll definitively be the better player. I'd say wait a few years and then we can come back and see what production looks like. Way too early to "compare".
Re: Parekh vs Jiricek
He thinks the Blues should lose more and draft earlieramp wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 23:02 pm Not sure if you're implying the Blues should have drafted Parekh instead but Parekh was off the board already. He went #9 and the Blues picked at #16. Unfortunately Parekh wasn't available anymore by the time the Blues picked (he was drafted by Calgary). If he was, it's safe to say he would have been taken instead. There's a draft order and only way teams can pick higher is by trading, or by finishing lower in the standings. Some players also mature faster than others but doesn't mean they'll definitively be the better player. I'd say wait a few years and then we can come back and see what production looks like. Way too early to "compare".
-
b-a-a-a-rclay
- Forum User
- Posts: 801
- Joined: 30 Jun 2024 08:51 am
Re: Parekh vs Jiricek
I think there is one person who is probably happy that the Blues tanked the last 3 minutes of game 7 vs jets so we could draft Carb.skilles wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 23:05 pmHe thinks the Blues should lose more and draft earlieramp wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 23:02 pm Not sure if you're implying the Blues should have drafted Parekh instead but Parekh was off the board already. He went #9 and the Blues picked at #16. Unfortunately Parekh wasn't available anymore by the time the Blues picked (he was drafted by Calgary). If he was, it's safe to say he would have been taken instead. There's a draft order and only way teams can pick higher is by trading, or by finishing lower in the standings. Some players also mature faster than others but doesn't mean they'll definitively be the better player. I'd say wait a few years and then we can come back and see what production looks like. Way too early to "compare".
Losing is good. Draft position is really the point of the sport.
-
Bluesfan1978
- Forum User
- Posts: 792
- Joined: 17 Jan 2021 16:44 pm
Re: Parekh vs Jiricek
I think Jiricek is going to be one of the top 3-4 D of his draft year as long as he stays somewhat healthy
-
a smell of green grass
- Forum User
- Posts: 1884
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: Parekh vs Jiricek
Getting warmer... Let's be super clear, shall we?skilles wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 23:05 pmHe thinks the Blues should lose more and draft earlieramp wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025 23:02 pm Not sure if you're implying the Blues should have drafted Parekh instead but Parekh was off the board already. He went #9 and the Blues picked at #16. Unfortunately Parekh wasn't available anymore by the time the Blues picked (he was drafted by Calgary). If he was, it's safe to say he would have been taken instead. There's a draft order and only way teams can pick higher is by trading, or by finishing lower in the standings. Some players also mature faster than others but doesn't mean they'll definitively be the better player. I'd say wait a few years and then we can come back and see what production looks like. Way too early to "compare".
In the 2023 season, the Blues won 5 more games total than Minnesota and Calgary. This led to Minnesota selecting Buium, and Calgary selecting Parekh, and St Louis selecting Jiricek.
Fast forward to now.
Buium and Parekh are starting and playing key roles on defense.
Jiricek is somewhere in Eastern Canada, playing mediocre hockey in the OHL, going to Burger King afterwards to gain 25lbs.
For quick fix to RHD in 2025, Army sent Bolduc to Montreal so that we could watch Maillloux try to be 1/2 as good as Buium or Parekh.
Meanwhile, Bolduc is making fans roar in Montreal.
Draft position matters, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOUR SCOUTING DEPARTMENT IS MEDIOCRE.