Parekh vs Jiricek

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1884
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Parekh vs Jiricek

Post by a smell of green grass »

While you ponder what Jiricek is eating in Eastern Canada today to gain an ounce, take a gander at Parekh on Calgary. He was drafted same year as our guy.

Thanks, Army.
Mr.Snuggleupagus
Forum User
Posts: 492
Joined: 23 Aug 2025 17:34 pm

Re: Parekh vs Jiricek

Post by Mr.Snuggleupagus »

Yeah, well the Blues had to wait their turn to pick. Can't just skip over everyone you know.
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1884
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: Parekh vs Jiricek

Post by a smell of green grass »

Mr.Snuggleupagus wrote: 11 Oct 2025 17:06 pm Yeah, well the Blues had to wait their turn to pick. Can't just skip over everyone you know.
What we all know:
- How the NHL draft works.
- Army doesn't want to select higher than 15 ever.
- Our draft picks take 3 years to mature, season, and gain weight.

What only some of us know:
- Defense Draft picks taken the same year as Jiricek are already playing significant roles in the NHL. Game 1, it was Buium. Today it was Parekh.
bluetunehead
Forum User
Posts: 1207
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm

Re: Parekh vs Jiricek

Post by bluetunehead »

Eh to me Armstrong’s biggest miss was not drafting Jack Hughes. Just imagine our offense with him and Thomas down the middle. The Blues were in the driver seat for the #1 pick at midseason that year and then blew it…
Frank Underwood
Forum User
Posts: 685
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:02 pm

Re: Parekh vs Jiricek

Post by Frank Underwood »

bluetunehead wrote: 11 Oct 2025 18:55 pm Eh to me Armstrong’s biggest miss was not drafting Jack Hughes. Just imagine our offense with him and Thomas down the middle. The Blues were in the driver seat for the #1 pick at midseason that year and then blew it…
A dark chapter in Blues history for sure!
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 7372
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: Parekh vs Jiricek

Post by DawgDad »

bluetunehead wrote: 11 Oct 2025 18:55 pm Eh to me Armstrong’s biggest miss was not drafting Jack Hughes. Just imagine our offense with him and Thomas down the middle. The Blues were in the driver seat for the #1 pick at midseason that year and then blew it…
Ha!

My first reaction to the Subject was "Pariah vs Jerk?"
Mr.Snuggleupagus
Forum User
Posts: 492
Joined: 23 Aug 2025 17:34 pm

Re: Parekh vs Jiricek

Post by Mr.Snuggleupagus »

a smell of green grass wrote: 11 Oct 2025 18:20 pm
Mr.Snuggleupagus wrote: 11 Oct 2025 17:06 pm Yeah, well the Blues had to wait their turn to pick. Can't just skip over everyone you know.
What we all know:
- How the NHL draft works.
- Army doesn't want to select higher than 15 ever.
- Our draft picks take 3 years to mature, season, and gain weight.

What only some of us know:
- Defense Draft picks taken the same year as Jiricek are already playing significant roles in the NHL. Game 1, it was Buium. Today it was Parekh.
"Some of us know" those 2 players were more advanced, mature & NHL ready than Jiricek.

"We all know" that's why they were picked higher. (For the record; I wanted Solberg)
Harry S Deals
Forum User
Posts: 1935
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm

Re: Parekh vs Jiricek

Post by Harry S Deals »

Mr.Snuggleupagus wrote: 11 Oct 2025 19:00 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 11 Oct 2025 18:20 pm
Mr.Snuggleupagus wrote: 11 Oct 2025 17:06 pm Yeah, well the Blues had to wait their turn to pick. Can't just skip over everyone you know.
What we all know:
- How the NHL draft works.
- Army doesn't want to select higher than 15 ever.
- Our draft picks take 3 years to mature, season, and gain weight.

What only some of us know:
- Defense Draft picks taken the same year as Jiricek are already playing significant roles in the NHL. Game 1, it was Buium. Today it was Parekh.
"Some of us know" those 2 players were more advanced, mature & NHL ready than Jiricek.

"We all know" that's why they were picked higher. (For the record; I wanted Solberg)
Lol dumb (donkey) I thought Calgary was "putting on a show" in their home opener
Mr.Snuggleupagus
Forum User
Posts: 492
Joined: 23 Aug 2025 17:34 pm

Re: Parekh vs Jiricek

Post by Mr.Snuggleupagus »

Harry S Deals wrote: 11 Oct 2025 19:13 pm
Mr.Snuggleupagus wrote: 11 Oct 2025 19:00 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 11 Oct 2025 18:20 pm
Mr.Snuggleupagus wrote: 11 Oct 2025 17:06 pm Yeah, well the Blues had to wait their turn to pick. Can't just skip over everyone you know.
What we all know:
- How the NHL draft works.
- Army doesn't want to select higher than 15 ever.
- Our draft picks take 3 years to mature, season, and gain weight.

What only some of us know:
- Defense Draft picks taken the same year as Jiricek are already playing significant roles in the NHL. Game 1, it was Buium. Today it was Parekh.
"Some of us know" those 2 players were more advanced, mature & NHL ready than Jiricek.

"We all know" that's why they were picked higher. (For the record; I wanted Solberg)
Lol dumb (donkey) I thought Calgary was "putting on a show" in their home opener
What are you talking about Harry? This thread is about Jiricek, Parekh & the 2024 NHL draft.

Do you have Tourette syndrome Harry?
Harry S Deals
Forum User
Posts: 1935
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm

Re: Parekh vs Jiricek

Post by Harry S Deals »

Mr.Snuggleupagus wrote: 11 Oct 2025 19:18 pm
Harry S Deals wrote: 11 Oct 2025 19:13 pm
Mr.Snuggleupagus wrote: 11 Oct 2025 19:00 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 11 Oct 2025 18:20 pm
Mr.Snuggleupagus wrote: 11 Oct 2025 17:06 pm Yeah, well the Blues had to wait their turn to pick. Can't just skip over everyone you know.
What we all know:
- How the NHL draft works.
- Army doesn't want to select higher than 15 ever.
- Our draft picks take 3 years to mature, season, and gain weight.

What only some of us know:
- Defense Draft picks taken the same year as Jiricek are already playing significant roles in the NHL. Game 1, it was Buium. Today it was Parekh.
"Some of us know" those 2 players were more advanced, mature & NHL ready than Jiricek.

"We all know" that's why they were picked higher. (For the record; I wanted Solberg)
Lol dumb (donkey) I thought Calgary was "putting on a show" in their home opener
What are you talking about Harry? This thread is about Jiricek, Parekh & the 2024 NHL draft.

Do you have Tourette syndrome Harry?
No your just another loud forum (bleep) most likely the same [shirt] different user name. All I hear is blah blah blah
Mr.Snuggleupagus
Forum User
Posts: 492
Joined: 23 Aug 2025 17:34 pm

Re: Parekh vs Jiricek

Post by Mr.Snuggleupagus »

Harry S Deals wrote: 11 Oct 2025 21:52 pm
Mr.Snuggleupagus wrote: 11 Oct 2025 19:18 pm What are you talking about Harry? This thread is about Jiricek, Parekh & the 2024 NHL draft.

Do you have Tourette syndrome Harry?
No your just another loud forum (bleep) most likely the same [shirt] different user name. All I hear is blah blah blah
Poor Harry; can't discuss hockey, stay on topic and resorts to name calling. Seek help Harry, I'm pulling for ya.
amp
Forum User
Posts: 83
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:27 pm

Re: Parekh vs Jiricek

Post by amp »

Not sure if you're implying the Blues should have drafted Parekh instead but Parekh was off the board already. He went #9 and the Blues picked at #16. Unfortunately Parekh wasn't available anymore by the time the Blues picked (he was drafted by Calgary). If he was, it's safe to say he would have been taken instead. There's a draft order and only way teams can pick higher is by trading, or by finishing lower in the standings. Some players also mature faster than others but doesn't mean they'll definitively be the better player. I'd say wait a few years and then we can come back and see what production looks like. Way too early to "compare".
skilles
Forum User
Posts: 1523
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:28 pm

Re: Parekh vs Jiricek

Post by skilles »

amp wrote: 11 Oct 2025 23:02 pm Not sure if you're implying the Blues should have drafted Parekh instead but Parekh was off the board already. He went #9 and the Blues picked at #16. Unfortunately Parekh wasn't available anymore by the time the Blues picked (he was drafted by Calgary). If he was, it's safe to say he would have been taken instead. There's a draft order and only way teams can pick higher is by trading, or by finishing lower in the standings. Some players also mature faster than others but doesn't mean they'll definitively be the better player. I'd say wait a few years and then we can come back and see what production looks like. Way too early to "compare".
He thinks the Blues should lose more and draft earlier
b-a-a-a-rclay
Forum User
Posts: 801
Joined: 30 Jun 2024 08:51 am

Re: Parekh vs Jiricek

Post by b-a-a-a-rclay »

skilles wrote: 11 Oct 2025 23:05 pm
amp wrote: 11 Oct 2025 23:02 pm Not sure if you're implying the Blues should have drafted Parekh instead but Parekh was off the board already. He went #9 and the Blues picked at #16. Unfortunately Parekh wasn't available anymore by the time the Blues picked (he was drafted by Calgary). If he was, it's safe to say he would have been taken instead. There's a draft order and only way teams can pick higher is by trading, or by finishing lower in the standings. Some players also mature faster than others but doesn't mean they'll definitively be the better player. I'd say wait a few years and then we can come back and see what production looks like. Way too early to "compare".
He thinks the Blues should lose more and draft earlier
I think there is one person who is probably happy that the Blues tanked the last 3 minutes of game 7 vs jets so we could draft Carb.
Losing is good. Draft position is really the point of the sport.
Bluesfan1978
Forum User
Posts: 792
Joined: 17 Jan 2021 16:44 pm

Re: Parekh vs Jiricek

Post by Bluesfan1978 »

I think Jiricek is going to be one of the top 3-4 D of his draft year as long as he stays somewhat healthy
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1884
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: Parekh vs Jiricek

Post by a smell of green grass »

skilles wrote: 11 Oct 2025 23:05 pm
amp wrote: 11 Oct 2025 23:02 pm Not sure if you're implying the Blues should have drafted Parekh instead but Parekh was off the board already. He went #9 and the Blues picked at #16. Unfortunately Parekh wasn't available anymore by the time the Blues picked (he was drafted by Calgary). If he was, it's safe to say he would have been taken instead. There's a draft order and only way teams can pick higher is by trading, or by finishing lower in the standings. Some players also mature faster than others but doesn't mean they'll definitively be the better player. I'd say wait a few years and then we can come back and see what production looks like. Way too early to "compare".
He thinks the Blues should lose more and draft earlier
Getting warmer... Let's be super clear, shall we?

In the 2023 season, the Blues won 5 more games total than Minnesota and Calgary. This led to Minnesota selecting Buium, and Calgary selecting Parekh, and St Louis selecting Jiricek.

Fast forward to now.

Buium and Parekh are starting and playing key roles on defense.
Jiricek is somewhere in Eastern Canada, playing mediocre hockey in the OHL, going to Burger King afterwards to gain 25lbs.
For quick fix to RHD in 2025, Army sent Bolduc to Montreal so that we could watch Maillloux try to be 1/2 as good as Buium or Parekh.
Meanwhile, Bolduc is making fans roar in Montreal.

Draft position matters, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOUR SCOUTING DEPARTMENT IS MEDIOCRE.
Post Reply