Luke hughes 9mil per
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1681
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm
Re: Luke hughes 9mil per
Luke is a real good player. I think I’d take him over both his brothers. He’s going to have a monster year.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1823
- Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm
Re: Luke hughes 9mil per
I share your belief this one is best of the three at the end of the day. They're all excellent.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 15:00 pm Luke is a real good player. I think I’d take him over both his brothers. He’s going to have a monster year.
I think of the impending Stenberg Situation too
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 106
- Joined: 12 Jun 2024 09:05 am
Re: Luke hughes 9mil per
I would do this all day long over giving Kaprizov 17 million a year. This seems a bargain in comparison.
Re: Luke hughes 9mil per
+1.... and I'd take Boldy over Kaprizov; if I had to choose.rangergiff wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 15:30 pm I would do this all day long over giving Kaprizov 17 million a year. This seems a bargain in comparison.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm
Re: Luke hughes 9mil per
I’m thinking we get Broberg for around 7 x $7.5 when he signs. And while they are at it, guessing Holloway gets something similar to McTavish/Johnston money, which would be in the $7m to $8.25m. Don’t see him exceeding Thomas or Kyrou.Younghopp1991 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 14:52 pm https://www.nhl.com/news/luke-hughes-si ... sey-devils
Get ready for the broberg numbers
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 559
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 10:23 am
Re: Luke hughes 9mil per
That's the real pickle, though.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 15:48 pmI’m thinking we get Broberg for around 7 x $7.5 when he signs. And while they are at it, guessing Holloway gets something similar to McTavish/Johnston money, which would be in the $7m to $8.25m. Don’t see him exceeding Thomas or Kyrou.Younghopp1991 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 14:52 pm https://www.nhl.com/news/luke-hughes-si ... sey-devils
Get ready for the broberg numbers
At 8.5m, that's too much of a bargain to be the Blues' ceiling at the rate the cap is growing. By the time our recent first rounders are all on their second contracts, 8.5m might well be the going rate - especially as more and more players are opting for longer term second deals and buying into their UFA periods.
Would Steen go 10Mx7 for Dvorsky, if he looks like a 60 pt, 2-way center? Would doing so upset the locker room?
Re: Luke hughes 9mil per
Wow.Army's Mom wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 16:53 pmThat's the real pickle, though.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 15:48 pmI’m thinking we get Broberg for around 7 x $7.5 when he signs. And while they are at it, guessing Holloway gets something similar to McTavish/Johnston money, which would be in the $7m to $8.25m. Don’t see him exceeding Thomas or Kyrou.Younghopp1991 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 14:52 pm https://www.nhl.com/news/luke-hughes-si ... sey-devils
Get ready for the broberg numbers
At 8.5m, that's too much of a bargain to be the Blues' ceiling at the rate the cap is growing. By the time our recent first rounders are all on their second contracts, 8.5m might well be the going rate - especially as more and more players are opting for longer term second deals and buying into their UFA periods.
Would Steen go 10Mx7 for Dvorsky, if he looks like a 60 pt, 2-way center? Would doing so upset the locker room?
60 points gets 10 mil on futures?
I dunno.
I'd say he would get a bridge for less.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2640
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
Re: Luke hughes 9mil per
I’d guess that no, that wouldn’t upset the room but only because Dvorsky has 3 years left on his ELC and I’m guessing the Cap will be notably higher then. But it’s just a guess. Something better to revisit in a year or two.Army's Mom wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 16:53 pmThat's the real pickle, though.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 15:48 pmI’m thinking we get Broberg for around 7 x $7.5 when he signs. And while they are at it, guessing Holloway gets something similar to McTavish/Johnston money, which would be in the $7m to $8.25m. Don’t see him exceeding Thomas or Kyrou.Younghopp1991 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 14:52 pm https://www.nhl.com/news/luke-hughes-si ... sey-devils
Get ready for the broberg numbers
At 8.5m, that's too much of a bargain to be the Blues' ceiling at the rate the cap is growing. By the time our recent first rounders are all on their second contracts, 8.5m might well be the going rate - especially as more and more players are opting for longer term second deals and buying into their UFA periods.
Would Steen go 10Mx7 for Dvorsky, if he looks like a 60 pt, 2-way center? Would doing so upset the locker room?
Re: Luke hughes 9mil per
Well that is apples to oranges, Hughes is 22 years old coming off his entry level deal with lots of team control and Kaprizov is 28 years old and was about to be a UFA with not team control.rangergiff wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 15:30 pm I would do this all day long over giving Kaprizov 17 million a year. This seems a bargain in comparison.
Kaprizovs bridge deal was also 9 million
Re: Luke hughes 9mil per
Holy [shirt]. 7.5 on potential I guess.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 15:48 pmI’m thinking we get Broberg for around 7 x $7.5 when he signs. And while they are at it, guessing Holloway gets something similar to McTavish/Johnston money, which would be in the $7m to $8.25m. Don’t see him exceeding Thomas or Kyrou.Younghopp1991 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 14:52 pm https://www.nhl.com/news/luke-hughes-si ... sey-devils
Get ready for the broberg numbers
The guy looks to be a good one. But last I saw. 4.5 would be a over payment.
However. Since, Army did it. 7.5 might be about right for what we've seen.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 401
- Joined: 10 Apr 2022 22:23 pm
Re: Luke hughes 9mil per
I doubt broberg accepts 7.5 if they offered it. Especially if they wait till mid season or offseason and hes having a good year.Cahokanut wrote: ↑02 Oct 2025 05:13 amHoly [shirt]. 7.5 on potential I guess.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 15:48 pmI’m thinking we get Broberg for around 7 x $7.5 when he signs. And while they are at it, guessing Holloway gets something similar to McTavish/Johnston money, which would be in the $7m to $8.25m. Don’t see him exceeding Thomas or Kyrou.Younghopp1991 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 14:52 pm https://www.nhl.com/news/luke-hughes-si ... sey-devils
Get ready for the broberg numbers
The guy looks to be a good one. But last I saw. 4.5 would be a over payment.
However. Since, Army did it. 7.5 might be about right for what we've seen.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: 20 Dec 2020 10:49 am
Re: Luke hughes 9mil per
4.5 would be an overpayment... lolz
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 559
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 10:23 am
Re: Luke hughes 9mil per
Oh, for sure it's a long way off. But at the rate the cap is growing and younger players are cashing in, it wouldn't surprise me a bit to see one of our current prospects reset the pay scale while barely even cementing their place in the top 6 or top 4. I would hope it wouldn't upset the room, but then I think back to Kyrou's deal...STL fan in MN wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 17:53 pmI’d guess that no, that wouldn’t upset the room but only because Dvorsky has 3 years left on his ELC and I’m guessing the Cap will be notably higher then. But it’s just a guess. Something better to revisit in a year or two.Army's Mom wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 16:53 pmThat's the real pickle, though.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 15:48 pmI’m thinking we get Broberg for around 7 x $7.5 when he signs. And while they are at it, guessing Holloway gets something similar to McTavish/Johnston money, which would be in the $7m to $8.25m. Don’t see him exceeding Thomas or Kyrou.Younghopp1991 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 14:52 pm https://www.nhl.com/news/luke-hughes-si ... sey-devils
Get ready for the broberg numbers
At 8.5m, that's too much of a bargain to be the Blues' ceiling at the rate the cap is growing. By the time our recent first rounders are all on their second contracts, 8.5m might well be the going rate - especially as more and more players are opting for longer term second deals and buying into their UFA periods.
Would Steen go 10Mx7 for Dvorsky, if he looks like a 60 pt, 2-way center? Would doing so upset the locker room?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 106
- Joined: 12 Jun 2024 09:05 am
Re: Luke hughes 9mil per
skilles wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 23:02 pmWell that is apples to oranges, Hughes is 22 years old coming off his entry level deal with lots of team control and Kaprizov is 28 years old and was about to be a UFA with not team control.rangergiff wrote: ↑01 Oct 2025 15:30 pm I would do this all day long over giving Kaprizov 17 million a year. This seems a bargain in comparison.
Kaprizovs bridge deal was also 9 million
All I'm saying is that if he is worth 17 million a year then McDavid is worth 25 million. Mackinnon, Makar, Hughes, Kuch and Pasta are all gonna be north of 20 million. It's not sustainable is my point.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 3678
- Joined: 12 Jan 2019 20:05 pm
Re: Luke hughes 9mil per
That's not how you should look at kaprizov vs Mcdavid tho. Hockey is messed up because the revenue isn't as cut and dry as the NFL and NBA. (not talking about MLB because that's a whole different mess)
Hockey at times underperforms immensely from a TV standpoint so there isn't a bonified bottom dollar that the league is working off of. I think it is getting better and if it wasn't for covid we might already have been there. But McDavid, Mackinnon, Kaprizov, Pasta, Drai, Makar, Matthews, Marner. Those guys should all be signing at the max deal, whatever that dollar amount is. But they aren't there as a league yet.
Hockey at times underperforms immensely from a TV standpoint so there isn't a bonified bottom dollar that the league is working off of. I think it is getting better and if it wasn't for covid we might already have been there. But McDavid, Mackinnon, Kaprizov, Pasta, Drai, Makar, Matthews, Marner. Those guys should all be signing at the max deal, whatever that dollar amount is. But they aren't there as a league yet.