Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

imadangman
Forum User
Posts: 2976
Joined: 14 Dec 2022 09:21 am

Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Post by imadangman »

I had wondered about this and maybe did a little research but not enough to answer for sure.

Was the pre-2004 Pujols extension the 1st of its type? It came before any of the massive, long-term pre-arb extensions we commonly see today.

Is there an example before Pujols of a player with 3 years of service time (or earlier) receiving an extension of 7 years or more?

That extension might have been the single best move of Jocketty's GM tenure.
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 913
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Post by ScotchMIrish »

First ever multi-year might have been Babe Ruth in 1930. 2 years for $160,000.
imadangman
Forum User
Posts: 2976
Joined: 14 Dec 2022 09:21 am

Re: Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Post by imadangman »

imadangman wrote: 25 Sep 2025 14:03 pm Is there an example before Pujols of a player with 3 years of service time (or earlier) receiving an extension of 7 years or more?
Putting this here again to clarify my question. Not looking for an entire history of mlb contracts.
imadangman
Forum User
Posts: 2976
Joined: 14 Dec 2022 09:21 am

Re: Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Post by imadangman »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 25 Sep 2025 14:25 pm First ever multi-year might have been Babe Ruth in 1930. 2 years for $160,000.
Good information though that's very interesting
Bomber1
Forum User
Posts: 1300
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:27 pm

Re: Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Post by Bomber1 »

During the 1990’s Cleveland extended some of their young players early.

Not sure of any specifics though.
Sheepdawg
Forum User
Posts: 6891
Joined: 12 Apr 2020 23:07 pm

Re: Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Post by Sheepdawg »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 25 Sep 2025 14:25 pm First ever multi-year might have been Babe Ruth in 1930. 2 years for $160,000.
Imagine how much a prime Bambino would pull in today.
imadangman
Forum User
Posts: 2976
Joined: 14 Dec 2022 09:21 am

Re: Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Post by imadangman »

Sheepdawg wrote: 25 Sep 2025 15:24 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 25 Sep 2025 14:25 pm First ever multi-year might have been Babe Ruth in 1930. 2 years for $160,000.
Imagine how much a prime Bambino would pull in today.
Would he pull in more (hot dogs) than Burleson?
brock118
Forum User
Posts: 380
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:56 pm

Re: Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Post by brock118 »

imadangman wrote: 25 Sep 2025 14:03 pm I had wondered about this and maybe did a little research but not enough to answer for sure.

Was the pre-2004 Pujols extension the 1st of its type? It came before any of the massive, long-term pre-arb extensions we commonly see today.

Is there an example before Pujols of a player with 3 years of service time (or earlier) receiving an extension of 7 years or more?

That extension might have been the single best move of Jocketty's GM tenure.
It was the largest of its kind at the time. I doubt if it was the first.
WaltsSuccessor
Forum User
Posts: 262
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:50 pm

Re: Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Post by WaltsSuccessor »

brock118 wrote: 25 Sep 2025 15:40 pm
imadangman wrote: 25 Sep 2025 14:03 pm I had wondered about this and maybe did a little research but not enough to answer for sure.

Was the pre-2004 Pujols extension the 1st of its type? It came before any of the massive, long-term pre-arb extensions we commonly see today.

Is there an example before Pujols of a player with 3 years of service time (or earlier) receiving an extension of 7 years or more?

That extension might have been the single best move of Jocketty's GM tenure.
It was the largest of its kind at the time. I doubt if it was the first.
Correct. The total dollar amount was the largest deal at that years of service time. Brock is likely right it wasn't the first, but it was definitely not the norm at the time. What a bargain that ended up being. Too bad it wasn't 2-3 years longer.
imadangman
Forum User
Posts: 2976
Joined: 14 Dec 2022 09:21 am

Re: Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Post by imadangman »

WaltsSuccessor wrote: 25 Sep 2025 16:03 pm
brock118 wrote: 25 Sep 2025 15:40 pm
imadangman wrote: 25 Sep 2025 14:03 pm I had wondered about this and maybe did a little research but not enough to answer for sure.

Was the pre-2004 Pujols extension the 1st of its type? It came before any of the massive, long-term pre-arb extensions we commonly see today.

Is there an example before Pujols of a player with 3 years of service time (or earlier) receiving an extension of 7 years or more?

That extension might have been the single best move of Jocketty's GM tenure.
It was the largest of its kind at the time. I doubt if it was the first.
Correct. The total dollar amount was the largest deal at that years of service time. Brock is likely right it wasn't the first, but it was definitely not the norm at the time. What a bargain that ended up being. Too bad it wasn't 2-3 years longer.
Yea, and give DeDe the opt-out clause
hugeCardfan
Forum User
Posts: 1761
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:42 pm

Re: Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Post by hugeCardfan »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 25 Sep 2025 14:25 pm First ever multi-year might have been Babe Ruth in 1930. 2 years for $160,000.
He had a better year than the President. :mrgreen:
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 913
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Post by ScotchMIrish »

hugeCardfan wrote: 25 Sep 2025 17:08 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 25 Sep 2025 14:25 pm First ever multi-year might have been Babe Ruth in 1930. 2 years for $160,000.
He had a better year than the President. :mrgreen:
:-)
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 913
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Post by ScotchMIrish »

Sheepdawg wrote: 25 Sep 2025 15:24 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 25 Sep 2025 14:25 pm First ever multi-year might have been Babe Ruth in 1930. 2 years for $160,000.
Imagine how much a prime Bambino would pull in today.
Pete Rose said the Babe was the best because of the quality of baseballs at that time. Rose said the Babe was hitting rocks.
Gob
Forum User
Posts: 85
Joined: 26 May 2024 22:19 pm

Re: Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Post by Gob »

And right one cue this forum was calling that contract a disaster when he was batting .260 with single digit homers in May
imadangman
Forum User
Posts: 2976
Joined: 14 Dec 2022 09:21 am

Re: Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Post by imadangman »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 25 Sep 2025 19:58 pm
Sheepdawg wrote: 25 Sep 2025 15:24 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 25 Sep 2025 14:25 pm First ever multi-year might have been Babe Ruth in 1930. 2 years for $160,000.
Imagine how much a prime Bambino would pull in today.
Pete Rose said the Babe was the best because of the quality of baseballs at that time. Rose said the Babe was hitting rocks.
Very interesting.
PadsFS07
Forum User
Posts: 276
Joined: 28 May 2024 08:54 am

Re: Question about the 1st Pujols deal

Post by PadsFS07 »

I believe Torii Hunter was the first to do a big contract in pre-arbitration, but there may have been others. There are many examples though like Pedro Martinez, Bagwell, etc where players avoided arbitration in the 90s with large contracts. Pujols was a big deal due to the $100M price tag.
Post Reply