Re-acquire Bader for 26 and beyond?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:55 pm
Re: Re-acquire Bader for 26 and beyond?
NO.
I like Bader, and I'm glad he's having a good year. But because of that he's going to get significantly more money than he's really worth. We've given out far too many of those contracts. It's a big reason why we're in the spot we're in.
I like Bader, and I'm glad he's having a good year. But because of that he's going to get significantly more money than he's really worth. We've given out far too many of those contracts. It's a big reason why we're in the spot we're in.
Re: Re-acquire Bader for 26 and beyond?
First gut reaction I would say no.
Now.....depending on the other moves?
Could he fit being RH if his asking price is reasonable?
Maybe??
Now.....depending on the other moves?
Could he fit being RH if his asking price is reasonable?
Maybe??
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 774
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Re-acquire Bader for 26 and beyond?
If the Cardinals spend money it has to be on pitching. They have outfielders who can't get into the lineup. If they do spend on a position player it would be catcher since we have at least 2 catchers on the payroll who can't catch.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5811
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Re-acquire Bader for 26 and beyond?
+1 they aren’t going to have much money to spend so it needs to be on starting pitchingScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025 12:15 pm If the Cardinals spend money it has to be on pitching. They have outfielders who can't get into the lineup. If they do spend on a position player it would be catcher since we have at least 2 catchers on the payroll who can't catch.
Re: Re-acquire Bader for 26 and beyond?
YesOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025 12:18 pm+1 they aren’t going to have much money to spend so it needs to be on starting pitchingScotchMIrish wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025 12:15 pm If the Cardinals spend money it has to be on pitching. They have outfielders who can't get into the lineup. If they do spend on a position player it would be catcher since we have at least 2 catchers on the payroll who can't catch.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 308
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm
Re: Re-acquire Bader for 26 and beyond?
This past off-season, Tyler O'Neill looked like a relative bargain after posting a 2nd-best OPS+ year of his career, after two consecutive sub-100+ years.
Ask Baltimore how that's working out, what with him presently working on yet another sub-100+ OPS season.
The word "mirage" exists for a reason.
Ask Baltimore how that's working out, what with him presently working on yet another sub-100+ OPS season.
The word "mirage" exists for a reason.
Re: Re-acquire Bader for 26 and beyond?
then where do you find someone who DOESN'T cost more than they are worth, either in $ or talent? Maybe the true "Market price" is higher than we think it is and we just don't like reality.Strummer Jones wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025 12:01 pm NO.
I like Bader, and I'm glad he's having a good year. But because of that he's going to get significantly more money than he's really worth. We've given out far too many of those contracts. It's a big reason why we're in the spot we're in.
We don't have anyone in our system with a realistic CF ceiling of 127 OPS+/4.5 WAR.
Re: Re-acquire Bader for 26 and beyond?
he's actually been hurt. But if healthy, an OPS+ near 100 in CF would be a WHOLE LOT better than Scott. Where do we find that?Imperial Capitalist wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025 12:34 pm This past off-season, Tyler O'Neill looked like a relative bargain after posting a 2nd-best OPS+ year of his career, after two consecutive sub-100+ years.
Ask Baltimore how that's working out, what with him presently working on yet another sub-100+ OPS season.
The word "mirage" exists for a reason.
Re: Re-acquire Bader for 26 and beyond?
yup - I'm hoping for a Dodger/Philly NLCS !!!
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 308
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm
Re: Re-acquire Bader for 26 and beyond?
O'Neill being hurt for a good chunk of the season is so shocking, given his track record on that subject.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025 12:38 pmhe's actually been hurt. But if healthy, an OPS+ near 100 in CF would be a WHOLE LOT better than Scott. Where do we find that?Imperial Capitalist wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025 12:34 pm This past off-season, Tyler O'Neill looked like a relative bargain after posting a 2nd-best OPS+ year of his career, after two consecutive sub-100+ years.
Ask Baltimore how that's working out, what with him presently working on yet another sub-100+ OPS season.
The word "mirage" exists for a reason.
Bader will finish 2025 with career highs in:
- HR
- RBIs
- 2B
- BA
- SLG
- OBP
I don't care one bit for VS II in CF, but until 2027 is resolved, I don't get the vibe they're too concerned about it at present.
I'm no hater of Bader...always liked the guy. I just don't see any possible Cardinal Nation way this occurs, or even should occur.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4138
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:24 pm
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 696
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:45 pm
Re: Re-acquire Bader for 26 and beyond?
I like Bader and believe he would be a good addition , but is it worth the money he will demand. He would likely be a part time player possibly platooed in CF with VS.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:55 pm
Re: Re-acquire Bader for 26 and beyond?
Well, that's the the trick, isn't it?Carp4Cy wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025 12:36 pmthen where do you find someone who DOESN'T cost more than they are worth, either in $ or talent? Maybe the true "Market price" is higher than we think it is and we just don't like reality.Strummer Jones wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025 12:01 pm NO.
I like Bader, and I'm glad he's having a good year. But because of that he's going to get significantly more money than he's really worth. We've given out far too many of those contracts. It's a big reason why we're in the spot we're in.
We don't have anyone in our system with a realistic CF ceiling of 127 OPS+/4.5 WAR.
The vast majority of free agents will probably make more than they're worth. But that's the price you pay for a Juan Soto or someone like that. Not a Harrison Bader. Or a Dexter Fowler, or Brett Cecil, or Steven Matz, etc.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 11915
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Re-acquire Bader for 26 and beyond?
He'll need a good spring training to even make the team.hugeCardfan wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025 11:55 am I don't want anything to get in the way of giving Church a shot next year. Bader would do that and Bader really has nowhere to go.
.184 .268 .265 .533
(Small sample size) but not impressed w/him thus far.
Re: Re-acquire Bader for 26 and beyond?
if the VAST Majority costs X, by definition, that IS what they are worth. The market defines worth. There are always outliers, but the vast majority can't be "an outlier".Strummer Jones wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025 14:02 pmWell, that's the the trick, isn't it?Carp4Cy wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025 12:36 pmthen where do you find someone who DOESN'T cost more than they are worth, either in $ or talent? Maybe the true "Market price" is higher than we think it is and we just don't like reality.Strummer Jones wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025 12:01 pm NO.
I like Bader, and I'm glad he's having a good year. But because of that he's going to get significantly more money than he's really worth. We've given out far too many of those contracts. It's a big reason why we're in the spot we're in.
We don't have anyone in our system with a realistic CF ceiling of 127 OPS+/4.5 WAR.
The vast majority of free agents will probably make more than they're worth. But that's the price you pay for a Juan Soto or someone like that. Not a Harrison Bader. Or a Dexter Fowler, or Brett Cecil, or Steven Matz, etc.