You glad you didn't now?
South Carolina
Moderator: STLtoday Forum Moderators
Re: South Carolina
We'll, we were only starting the obvious.
Re: South Carolina
And now?jcgmoi wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025 15:09 pm I don't understand dismissing SC against Vandy out of hand.
The Cocks have better talent and they'll have the most gifted player on both sides of the ball in Sellers and Stewart. They're deeper and have the better staff imo. Importantly, they're at home.
People say, look how the Dores handled VaTech on the road and I agree that was impressive. But the Hokies appeared to run out of fight in the second half, just a week after they were run down by, wait for it, SC.
Vandy will try to stretch the game out so SC will have to stay patient but I like the Cocks in this one.
Re: South Carolina
That's not the first time I've been on the wrong side of a game. I'll get over it.
Re: South Carolina
jcgmoi wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025 15:09 pm I don't understand dismissing SC against Vandy out of hand.
The Cocks have better talent and they'll have the most gifted player on both sides of the ball in Sellers and Stewart. They're deeper and have the better staff imo. Importantly, they're at home.
People say, look how the Dores handled VaTech on the road and I agree that was impressive. But the Hokies appeared to run out of fight in the second half, just a week after they were run down by, wait for it, SC.
Vandy will try to stretch the game out so SC will have to stay patient but I like the Cocks in this one.



-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: 09 Sep 2018 14:06 pm
Re: South Carolina
I don’t like Beamer. He comes across as whiny.
I do think he’s a pretty good coach though and he’ll somehow have them ready to play us. We need to humiliate them, build a big lead early, break their spirit and don’t let up.
This is a very important game. Can’t lose a home game to a team that could be on a downward spiral.
I do think he’s a pretty good coach though and he’ll somehow have them ready to play us. We need to humiliate them, build a big lead early, break their spirit and don’t let up.
This is a very important game. Can’t lose a home game to a team that could be on a downward spiral.
Re: South Carolina
And the special teams coach needs to be in extra preparation this week for Beamer ball. Their punt returner has 3 returns for TDs already this year. And they have also blocked a punt for a TD. The Tigers are not special in the return game on either returning kicks or defending returns.Armchair QB wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 10:40 am I don’t like Beamer. He comes across as whiny.
I do think he’s a pretty good coach though and he’ll somehow have them ready to play us. We need to humiliate them, build a big lead early, break their spirit and don’t let up.
This is a very important game. Can’t lose a home game to a team that could be on a downward spiral.
Now hopefully, the Tigers won't be punting much.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: 26 Jun 2024 12:49 pm
Re: South Carolina
Here's an obvious overreaction.Can’t lose a home game to a team that could be on a downward spiral.
Teams that win road, conference games wouldn't be considered to be on a downward spiral.
Re: South Carolina
ThisArmchair QB wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 10:40 am I don’t like Beamer. He comes across as whiny.
I do think he’s a pretty good coach though and he’ll somehow have them ready to play us. We need to humiliate them, build a big lead early, break their spirit and don’t let up.
This is a very important game. Can’t lose a home game to a team that could be on a downward spiral.
Re: South Carolina
South Carolina's offensive numbers after Week 3:
Last in SEC in total offense (303 YPG)
Last in rushing (110 YPG)
Last in sacks allowed (8)
Last in first downs (52)
15th in scoring offense (23 PPG)
15th in TFL allowed (20)
15th in third down rate (30.5%)
15th in red zone rate
Last in SEC in total offense (303 YPG)
Last in rushing (110 YPG)
Last in sacks allowed (8)
Last in first downs (52)
15th in scoring offense (23 PPG)
15th in TFL allowed (20)
15th in third down rate (30.5%)
15th in red zone rate
Re: South Carolina
How silly of you not to take me up on the offer. This response of yours is 100% after the fact, not before. Therefore, it’s nothing but trolling from your end. And South Carolina was only down 14-7 when Sellers got hurt. You have no idea how it would have gone had he not left the game. You know it and are still trying to sound smart. You’re a joke and are possibly more annoying than winonsports.
Btw, Missouri was -3.5 last night. Hope you got it instead of talking about silly hindsight nonsense. The line is -12.5 now.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: 09 Sep 2018 14:06 pm
Re: South Carolina
winonsports wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 11:06 amHere's an obvious overreaction.Can’t lose a home game to a team that could be on a downward spiral.
Teams that win road, conference games wouldn't be considered to be on a downward spiral.
You’re trying, and I get that. But just sit it out little fella. You just don’t know what you’re doing here.
Re: South Carolina
After that fact? I predicted Vandy to win handily and they did. Even with Sellers SC looked bad. There is no taking the offer as I don't know you but I would have if we knew each other. I made the prediction clear in the response to jcmoi too. I don't have to try to sound smart. Stop being a crybaby.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 19:44 pmHow silly of you not to take me up on the offer. This response of yours is 100% after the fact, not before. Therefore, it’s nothing but trolling from your end. And South Carolina was only down 14-7 when Sellers got hurt. You have no idea how it would have gone had he not left the game. You know it and are still trying to sound smart. You’re a joke and are possibly more annoying than winonsports.
Btw, Missouri was -3.5 last night. Hope you got it instead of talking about silly hindsight nonsense. The line is -12.5 now.
Re: South Carolina
looked at several Carolina sites and none of THEM thought they would have won if Sellers stayed in as something is wrong with him before the targeted hit. rumors were he was concussed in fall camp and hasn't been right since and I watched the VT game and now vandy and wondered who that guy was out there as besides opening TD against VT he hasn't looked the same and his passing is inconsistant.
They are all PRAYING for a miracle as suddenly the faithful have lost their faith. they arn't good at stopping the run or keeping their QB on his feet. Could see MU running right over them and then lots of passes for success as they arn't a good D. Vandy handled their good DE by rolling away from him but their RT handled him well on his own. will give you fits at time but not a dominant guy.
They are all PRAYING for a miracle as suddenly the faithful have lost their faith. they arn't good at stopping the run or keeping their QB on his feet. Could see MU running right over them and then lots of passes for success as they arn't a good D. Vandy handled their good DE by rolling away from him but their RT handled him well on his own. will give you fits at time but not a dominant guy.
Re: South Carolina
TY for this information, man they are what they looked like, not good. thing is with that Oline not protecting very well you can't hardly run a guy a lot who was just concussed would you? doubt he can beat you with just throwing as their run game doesn't do much. Heck MU has three backs with more yards.icon wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 12:14 pm South Carolina's offensive numbers after Week 3:
Last in SEC in total offense (303 YPG)
Last in rushing (110 YPG)
Last in sacks allowed (8)
Last in first downs (52)
15th in scoring offense (23 PPG)
15th in TFL allowed (20)
15th in third down rate (30.5%)
15th in red zone rate