Re-Whatever is Not Coming Back

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

Post Reply
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1967
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re-Whatever is Not Coming Back

Post by a smell of green grass »

While I agree that there is a good chance that the Blues slip back into the need for a re-whatever, there is NO WAY that Armstrong is going to ever make it official. The last re-Whatever shone way too much light on his scouting and draft failures. Armstrong does not want accountability and transparency of his draft day decisions. He wants to play those cards close to his vest. Army wants to play above .500 in the regular season, call it a success and a day, and then listen to the applause. Army can get away with that in St Louis, so who would blame him?

https://bleedinblue.com/st-louis-blues- ... e=v_recirc
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 7502
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: Re-Whatever is Not Coming Back

Post by DawgDad »

Agree? With who, hearing voices again?

You know, in time EVERY team has a downturn. Every one of them. Casts your post as a "broken clock is right two times a day".
seattleblue
Forum User
Posts: 1942
Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm

Re: Re-Whatever is Not Coming Back

Post by seattleblue »

OP behaves like a jerky voice hearer.

That makes me the second person thus reaching the proposed limit

Ok so how this would then work is only me and Dawg Dad would engage in this specific thread.

He and I would each get to decide how and how long to reply in it. If he chooses, like I am choosing right now, to not post another post in this thread, then only the OP wold be replying and to get engagement would have to start another thread.

This forces two things to happen. (1) he doesn't post any more new threads today, day is over with that, easy peasy. or (2) he gets a little annoyed that we're actually holding off out of curiosity just to see whether it can work, and thus he responds to spam the board with more new posts that any two people (can be the same people, but I would personally take only one turn)

I don't think this is going to work but I am just explaining how it would.

It will also (3) make clear who wants to get in there and countertroll
Nublues69
Forum User
Posts: 641
Joined: 27 May 2024 23:05 pm

Re: Re-Whatever is Not Coming Back

Post by Nublues69 »

a smell of green grass wrote: 05 Sep 2025 12:20 pm While I agree that there is a good chance that the Blues slip back into the need for a re-whatever, there is NO WAY that Armstrong is going to ever make it official. The last re-Whatever shone way too much light on his scouting and draft failures. Armstrong does not want accountability and transparency of his draft day decisions. He wants to play those cards close to his vest. Army wants to play above .500 in the regular season, call it a success and a day, and then listen to the applause. Army can get away with that in St Louis, so who would blame him?

https://bleedinblue.com/st-louis-blues- ... e=v_recirc
Who is going to the home opener. Any one going to pre-game?
Aesa
Forum User
Posts: 2807
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:51 pm

Re: Re-Whatever is Not Coming Back

Post by Aesa »

Me and my son... and yes
danno
Forum User
Posts: 416
Joined: 20 Jun 2024 15:45 pm

Re: Re-Whatever is Not Coming Back

Post by danno »

I'll be there but prolly not going to the pregame since it's on a weekday and I have to work
TAFKAP
Forum User
Posts: 2249
Joined: 10 May 2018 17:44 pm

Re: Re-Whatever is Not Coming Back

Post by TAFKAP »

DawgDad wrote: 05 Sep 2025 12:51 pm Agree? With who, hearing voices again?

You know, in time EVERY team has a downturn. Every one of them. Casts your post as a "broken clock is right two times a day".
My kids love my quote for that,

"The sun shines on a sleeping dog's (donkey) at some point in the day".
Post Reply