Carter Hart
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
Re: Carter Hart
really that i didnt know. Interesting
Re: Carter Hart
You would think a team in this situation with this player reached out to the league in advance of any deadline and clarified what they should do, what they could do and/or what the outcome of those decisions would be. Maybe I'm being naive, but wouldn't the Flyers have done what was needed to cover their bases and ensure they get a fair shake in all of this?
-
STL fan in MN
- Forum User
- Posts: 2684
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
Re: Carter Hart
Perhaps? Or maybe their thinking was different back then. I wouldn’t be surprised if their stance back then was “we need to distance ourselves from Hart as much as possible.” and now that he’s been acquitted AND they need a goalie, perhaps their view of the situation is different now. Long story short, I wouldn’t be surprised if they didn’t put a lot of consideration into them perhaps wanting to retain Hart at some point in the future as for a while there, it was not looking good for these 5 guys at all.SRV1990 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 10:41 am You would think a team in this situation with this player reached out to the league in advance of any deadline and clarified what they should do, what they could do and/or what the outcome of those decisions would be. Maybe I'm being naive, but wouldn't the Flyers have done what was needed to cover their bases and ensure they get a fair shake in all of this?
-
Hockey Pete
- Forum User
- Posts: 342
- Joined: 25 May 2024 10:43 am
Re: Carter Hart
It would be interesting to find out the conversations with Flyer's and the Hart camp while this was all going on. Does Hart feel jaded at all toward the Org, or were they supportive?STL fan in MN wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 11:17 amPerhaps? Or maybe their thinking was different back then. I wouldn’t be surprised if their stance back then was “we need to distance ourselves from Hart as much as possible.” and now that he’s been acquitted AND they need a goalie, perhaps their view of the situation is different now. Long story short, I wouldn’t be surprised if they didn’t put a lot of consideration into them perhaps wanting to retain Hart at some point in the future as for a while there, it was not looking good for these 5 guys at all.SRV1990 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 10:41 am You would think a team in this situation with this player reached out to the league in advance of any deadline and clarified what they should do, what they could do and/or what the outcome of those decisions would be. Maybe I'm being naive, but wouldn't the Flyers have done what was needed to cover their bases and ensure they get a fair shake in all of this?
Re: Carter Hart
That's a very good point. The Flyers certainly may have felt the Carter ship had sailed and resolved themselves to the fact he wouldn't be playing for them. Tough spot, for sure.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 11:17 amPerhaps? Or maybe their thinking was different back then. I wouldn’t be surprised if their stance back then was “we need to distance ourselves from Hart as much as possible.” and now that he’s been acquitted AND they need a goalie, perhaps their view of the situation is different now. Long story short, I wouldn’t be surprised if they didn’t put a lot of consideration into them perhaps wanting to retain Hart at some point in the future as for a while there, it was not looking good for these 5 guys at all.SRV1990 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 10:41 am You would think a team in this situation with this player reached out to the league in advance of any deadline and clarified what they should do, what they could do and/or what the outcome of those decisions would be. Maybe I'm being naive, but wouldn't the Flyers have done what was needed to cover their bases and ensure they get a fair shake in all of this?
Re: Carter Hart
Maybe they have, there were a lot of fans upset that Hart and others were not IMMEDIATELY made eligible. It might be that the NHL, NHLPA, and a shitton of lawyers are trying to hammer out a deal. I can't find where the league made them ineligible in the first place. Hart asked for indefinite leave and was granted. Philly didn't attempt to QO him. There was no official "ban" from the league. I think this is a thing for the lawyers.SRV1990 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 10:41 am You would think a team in this situation with this player reached out to the league in advance of any deadline and clarified what they should do, what they could do and/or what the outcome of those decisions would be. Maybe I'm being naive, but wouldn't the Flyers have done what was needed to cover their bases and ensure they get a fair shake in all of this?