Make a prediction for a score. Otherwise, this is just you, a troll, on a Mizzou forum harassing Mizzou fans AGAIN.
It’s a free country, you have a right to post on here. Just know you are worthless and sad that you spend this much time contributing nothing but typing so much.
Here’s mine:
Mizzou - 36
KU - 27
KU’s QB is a problem and keeps them in it. But ultimately we’re just too much. The home crowd makes them cry by end of the game.
I asked for no comments without actually making a prediction for sake of content.
He can't. This clown as insecure as a moth on a flame. Truly pitiful.
Luke77 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2025 21:40 pmMizzou 55
kU 20
Drink will run the score up every chance he gets.
I agree that Drink will keep his foot on the gas and run it up if possible. Self and kU dropped 100 the first time we played them in basketball as an SEC school. I'd love to see football return the favor.
Make a prediction for a score. Otherwise, this is just you, a troll, on a Mizzou forum harassing Mizzou fans AGAIN.
It’s a free country, you have a right to post on here. Just know you are worthless and sad that you spend this much time contributing nothing but typing so much.
Here’s mine:
Mizzou - 36
KU - 27
KU’s QB is a problem and keeps them in it. But ultimately we’re just too much. The home crowd makes them cry by end of the game.
I asked for no comments without actually making a prediction for sake of content.
He can't. This clown as insecure as a moth on a flame. Truly pitiful.
Armchair definitely spends a lot of time typing so much about what is said to others after they badger Mizzou players and coaches.
Make a prediction for a score. Otherwise, this is just you, a troll, on a Mizzou forum harassing Mizzou fans AGAIN.
It’s a free country, you have a right to post on here. Just know you are worthless and sad that you spend this much time contributing nothing but typing so much.
Here’s mine:
Mizzou - 36
KU - 27
KU’s QB is a problem and keeps them in it. But ultimately we’re just too much. The home crowd makes them cry by end of the game.
I asked for no comments without actually making a prediction for sake of content.
He can't. This clown as insecure as a moth on a flame. Truly pitiful.
Armchair definitely spends a lot of time typing so much about what is said to others after they badger Mizzou players and coaches.
I challenge you to actually do what the OP asked and make a prediction for the score. Shock everyone on here and post a score prediction.
hangman wrote: ↑03 Sep 2025 05:45 am
Not sure where all these "O line problems" are coming from. We had one guy from Georgia who is playing a new position and gave up one sack. He's a potential All-American so I'm guessing he'll figure it out. Hardy ran for over 100 yards in limited duty.
Anyway, we'll see Saturday.
Good guys 60 kU pieces of chicken [shirt] 17.
You can't wait and see something that is being perceived as a negative now.
And just forget about giving them any credit for those TWO, 99 yard, TD drives.
But a sportswriter for the Tribune said we have O line problems so it must be true.
So, you can play Pollyanna and ignore a less than ideal performance against, arguably, the worst team Mizzou will face all season and believe a National Championship is right around the corner, or you can
look at things realistically and hope the coaching staff has things in hand.
Or you can be a Debby Downer because we didn't win by 100 and refuse to acknowledge that the QB looked better than any we've had recently, that we had two, 99-yard drives, a 100-yard rusher and a receiving corps that looked phenomenal.
Did you actually read the second article you posted? Or, did you panic when you saw the headline? It was from three weeks before the season started and had nothing to do with the Central Arkansas game.
If we don't beat kU, I can already envision your post saying fire Drink.
Were we perfect? Hell no. But did we do what we needed to? Hell yes. Did we see some talent on the field? I say yes, you can nit pick all you want but I'll take what we have and where we're headed.
All in all, the Tigers’ offensive line woes in the first game were not disastrous. They allowed a total of five pressures and one sack, none of which resulted in problems moving the ball offensively. The Tigers finished with 61 points, 560 total yards and seven touchdowns, after all, so the offense was unbothered on the whole. What was concerning was the manner of those pressures and what it might mean for a unit who will face much stiffer competition starting this Saturday.
Of the pressures allowed by the line, at least two were the direct cause of new left tackle Cayden Green. Green is a well-established good player, but his strong play has been at guard. By kicking Green out to tackle (at basically the last minute in fall camp), the Tigers opened themselves up to some growing pains. Pains that were felt primarily by Beau Pribula when Green missed an assignment and then whiffed on a block within just a few plays in the first half.
Are two misses in one game a big deal by themselves? Probably not… if there is growth moving forward. Switching up lineups two weeks before the season, especially when it results in four players playing in new spots, is bound to create some communication and execution issues. Coaches are fond of saying that the biggest improvement is from Week 1 to Week 2. The Tigers will need to prove that adage correct if they want to move the ball effectively going forward.
Of course, the coaches have things to tweak and work on. It was the first game with quite a few new players. But nothing in either article suggests that these are insurmountable obstacles or things that can't/won't be fixed.
Anyway, we can disagree but in the end I'll fight with you forever.
hangman wrote: ↑03 Sep 2025 05:45 am
Not sure where all these "O line problems" are coming from. We had one guy from Georgia who is playing a new position and gave up one sack. He's a potential All-American so I'm guessing he'll figure it out. Hardy ran for over 100 yards in limited duty.
Anyway, we'll see Saturday.
Good guys 60 kU pieces of chicken [shirt] 17.
You can't wait and see something that is being perceived as a negative now.
And just forget about giving them any credit for those TWO, 99 yard, TD drives.
But a sportswriter for the Tribune said we have O line problems so it must be true.
So, you can play Pollyanna and ignore a less than ideal performance against, arguably, the worst team Mizzou will face all season and believe a National Championship is right around the corner, or you can
look at things realistically and hope the coaching staff has things in hand.
Or you can be a Debby Downer because we didn't win by 100 and refuse to acknowledge that the QB looked better than any we've had recently, that we had two, 99-yard drives, a 100-yard rusher and a receiving corps that looked phenomenal.
Did you actually read the second article you posted? Or, did you panic when you saw the headline? It was from three weeks before the season started and had nothing to do with the Central Arkansas game.
If we don't beat kU, I can already envision your post saying fire Drink.
Were we perfect? Hell no. But did we do what we needed to? Hell yes. Did we see some talent on the field? I say yes, you can nit pick all you want but I'll take what we have and where we're headed.
HIs specialty seems to be links to outdated stories. Anyway, I don't know how anyone can dwell on the negatives in a 61-6 shellacking. Games like this are scheduled to iron out any kinks afterward. And that is happening as we speak. Onward, but I never make game week predictions, so I'll stick with that, though I did predict the Tigers would win this game in my season projection.
Also, Zollers and others got some valuable live action snaps. Can't hurt.
hangman wrote: ↑03 Sep 2025 05:45 am
Not sure where all these "O line problems" are coming from. We had one guy from Georgia who is playing a new position and gave up one sack. He's a potential All-American so I'm guessing he'll figure it out. Hardy ran for over 100 yards in limited duty.
Anyway, we'll see Saturday.
Good guys 60 kU pieces of chicken [shirt] 17.
You can't wait and see something that is being perceived as a negative now.
And just forget about giving them any credit for those TWO, 99 yard, TD drives.
But a sportswriter for the Tribune said we have O line problems so it must be true.
So, you can play Pollyanna and ignore a less than ideal performance against, arguably, the worst team Mizzou will face all season and believe a National Championship is right around the corner, or you can
look at things realistically and hope the coaching staff has things in hand.
Or you can be a Debby Downer because we didn't win by 100 and refuse to acknowledge that the QB looked better than any we've had recently, that we had two, 99-yard drives, a 100-yard rusher and a receiving corps that looked phenomenal.
Did you actually read the second article you posted? Or, did you panic when you saw the headline? It was from three weeks before the season started and had nothing to do with the Central Arkansas game.
If we don't beat kU, I can already envision your post saying fire Drink.
Were we perfect? Hell no. But did we do what we needed to? Hell yes. Did we see some talent on the field? I say yes, you can nit pick all you want but I'll take what we have and where we're headed.
HIs specialty seems to be links to outdated stories. Anyway, I don't know how anyone can dwell on the negatives in a 61-6 shellacking. Games like this are scheduled to iron out any kinks afterward. And that is happening as we speak. Onward, but I never make game week predictions, so I'll stick with that, though I did predict the Tigers would win this game in my season projection.
Also, Zollers and others got some valuable live action snaps. Can't hurt.
So an article 3 weeks before the game that presages the exact issue under discussion is somehow irrelevant... Huh.
hangman wrote: ↑03 Sep 2025 05:45 am
Not sure where all these "O line problems" are coming from. We had one guy from Georgia who is playing a new position and gave up one sack. He's a potential All-American so I'm guessing he'll figure it out. Hardy ran for over 100 yards in limited duty.
Anyway, we'll see Saturday.
Good guys 60 kU pieces of chicken [shirt] 17.
You can't wait and see something that is being perceived as a negative now.
And just forget about giving them any credit for those TWO, 99 yard, TD drives.
But a sportswriter for the Tribune said we have O line problems so it must be true.
So, you can play Pollyanna and ignore a less than ideal performance against, arguably, the worst team Mizzou will face all season and believe a National Championship is right around the corner, or you can
look at things realistically and hope the coaching staff has things in hand.
Or you can be a Debby Downer because we didn't win by 100 and refuse to acknowledge that the QB looked better than any we've had recently, that we had two, 99-yard drives, a 100-yard rusher and a receiving corps that looked phenomenal.
Did you actually read the second article you posted? Or, did you panic when you saw the headline? It was from three weeks before the season started and had nothing to do with the Central Arkansas game.
If we don't beat kU, I can already envision your post saying fire Drink.
Were we perfect? Hell no. But did we do what we needed to? Hell yes. Did we see some talent on the field? I say yes, you can nit pick all you want but I'll take what we have and where we're headed.
HIs specialty seems to be links to outdated stories. Anyway, I don't know how anyone can dwell on the negatives in a 61-6 shellacking. Games like this are scheduled to iron out any kinks afterward. And that is happening as we speak. Onward, but I never make game week predictions, so I'll stick with that, though I did predict the Tigers would win this game in my season projection.
Also, Zollers and others got some valuable live action snaps. Can't hurt.
So an article 3 weeks before the game that presages the exact issue under discussion is somehow irrelevant... Huh.
A couple of missed blocks by Green in pass protection is an issue? Not yet. The Tigers ran over them every which way, and Pribula had enough protection to pile up decent yardage. We'll all know a lot more after Game 2.
I think Mizzou is going to send a message Saturday. Gonna be a blowout. Mizzou 55- Kansas 23. Pribula throws for 350 with 4 tds. He decides to run for heisman.
Jobafish wrote: ↑03 Sep 2025 23:01 pm
I think Mizzou is going to send a message Saturday. Gonna be a blowout. Mizzou 55- Kansas 23. Pribula throws for 350 with 4 tds. He decides to run for heisman.
I like your style. Drink is going to take a page out of the Josh Heupel book and run up the score (maybe 60+). On social media, Drink gets the nerd guy image, but he is coming in saying F.A.F.O.
Jobafish wrote: ↑03 Sep 2025 23:01 pm
I think Mizzou is going to send a message Saturday. Gonna be a blowout. Mizzou 55- Kansas 23. Pribula throws for 350 with 4 tds. He decides to run for heisman.
I'd love to see a score like that come out of this game. KU has a good offense and that would bode well for both sides of the ball for Missouri.
But in the end, this early in the season, just get the win. I'll take a spread win right now thank you!
11WSChamps wrote: ↑03 Sep 2025 12:41 pm
The game will be alot closer than most are predicting .
I hope it isn't but I see it more 30-24 with MU on top.
Keep Daniel's contained in the pocket is the key.
I think people are in underestimating out offense. WRs are out standing, QB throws a great ball, RBs are fantastic, oline is already gelling. This might be the best offense since the Chase Daniel years.
