Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

TBone
Forum User
Posts: 990
Joined: 28 May 2024 09:00 am

Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Post by TBone »

Breakout Star Proving the Vancouver Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

PUBLICATION
Edward Jaxon
August 25, 2025

Some new information has suggested that a former Vancouver Canucks forward will be a perfect addition to his new club heading into the 2025-26 season.

- clip -

There are going to be some new faces in training camp, including Evander Kane who was acquired from the Edmonton Oilers in June, but there will also be some notable absences too, those who have left the organization for a new opportunity elsewhere in the NHL this summer.

One of those names who left the Vancouver Canucks earlier this summer was Swiss centerman Pius Suter, as he signed a two-year contract worth $4.125 million annually with the St. Louis Blues on the second day of the NHL's free agency period.

Losing Pius Suter could come back to bite the Vancouver Canucks as early as this season, as Patrik Allvin has had a difficult time trying to find some more help down the middle, but for the St. Louis Blues, who were also in the market for a centerman, it looks like it could be a home run signing.

Suter is coming off the best season of his National Hockey League career, registering new highs in goals (25) and points (46), while tying a previous high in assists (21) and as things stand right now, the Zurich native is projected to center St. Louis' third line behind Robert Thomas and captain Brayden Schenn.

https://www.canucksdaily.com/nhl-team/s ... the-chance
Old_Goat
Forum User
Posts: 621
Joined: 28 Dec 2024 08:46 am

Re: Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Post by Old_Goat »

Thanks for posting. Maybe not a blockbuster signing, but an excellent one indeed. Good timing as well. One of those solid often underrated moves that good teams make to gain balance & depth in the lineup.
blues2112
Forum User
Posts: 3562
Joined: 27 Apr 2018 18:17 pm

Re: Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Post by blues2112 »

(Another) good signing by Armstrong.

To be fair, though, Suter is hardly a "star"; and at, 29, hardly a "breakout."
dhsux
Forum User
Posts: 3490
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm

Re: Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Post by dhsux »

Old_Goat wrote: 26 Aug 2025 07:44 am Thanks for posting. Maybe not a blockbuster signing, but an excellent one indeed. Good timing as well. One of those solid often underrated moves that good teams make to gain balance & depth in the lineup.
Exactly right. It's not a small matter to me I look to this player to shore up the center and really help the Blues compete this year.
TheJackBurton
Forum User
Posts: 2596
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm

Re: Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Post by TheJackBurton »

I'm starting to believe the 2nd day signings are far better than first hour signings.
STL fan in MN
Forum User
Posts: 2684
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm

Re: Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Post by STL fan in MN »

I wasn’t super interested in Suter as I didn’t want to way overpay a guy for having 1 career year. But that was based on the assumption he was going to require something like 4 years at $5M to get him signed. To get him at 2 years at $4.125M is more than fair. Very happy we got him as he adds much needed center depth.

I view this as pretty similar to the Bozak signing years ago. Not a star signing but a very solid player that will play an important role and helps slot others where they need to be. I love Sunny for what he is but at this point in his career, he shouldn’t have been playing 3C.

As for this article, it’s just a Canucks fan blog quoting a Blues fam blog. But that said, I did find it a bit surprising the Canucks couldn’t find a way to keep this guy as they could really use him too. But perhaps all the turmoil in Vancouver made it so Pius was more than open to a new opportunity, idk.
TheJackBurton
Forum User
Posts: 2596
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm

Re: Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Post by TheJackBurton »

STL fan in MN wrote: 26 Aug 2025 09:06 am I wasn’t super interested in Suter as I didn’t want to way overpay a guy for having 1 career year. But that was based on the assumption he was going to require something like 4 years at $5M to get him signed. To get him at 2 years at $4.125M is more than fair. Very happy we got him as he adds much needed center depth.

I view this as pretty similar to the Bozak signing years ago. Not a star signing but a very solid player that will play an important role and helps slot others where they need to be. I love Sunny for what he is but at this point in his career, he shouldn’t have been playing 3C.

As for this article, it’s just a Canucks fan blog quoting a Blues fam blog. But that said, I did find it a bit surprising the Canucks couldn’t find a way to keep this guy as they could really use him too. But perhaps all the turmoil in Vancouver made it so Pius was more than open to a new opportunity, idk.
There's a lot to be said for not wanting to be in an organization when the front office is in absolute turmoil.

Vancouver is the poster child for what happens when the players run the team. You have Pettersson who pouted until Miller was traded (although based on reports Miller isn't exactly a beloved clubhouse individual) and now you have Hughes already telling you he isn't re-signing there and that he wants to play with his brothers in NJ.

People can (buzz) and moan about Army all they want, but we haven't ever seen dysfunction like that in the Blues locker room.
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 7502
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Post by DawgDad »

STL fan in MN wrote: 26 Aug 2025 09:06 am I wasn’t super interested in Suter as I didn’t want to way overpay a guy for having 1 career year. But that was based on the assumption he was going to require something like 4 years at $5M to get him signed. To get him at 2 years at $4.125M is more than fair. Very happy we got him as he adds much needed center depth.

I view this as pretty similar to the Bozak signing years ago. Not a star signing but a very solid player that will play an important role and helps slot others where they need to be. I love Sunny for what he is but at this point in his career, he shouldn’t have been playing 3C.

As for this article, it’s just a Canucks fan blog quoting a Blues fam blog. But that said, I did find it a bit surprising the Canucks couldn’t find a way to keep this guy as they could really use him too. But perhaps all the turmoil in Vancouver made it so Pius was more than open to a new opportunity, idk.
Hoping Bozak is a good comp, Blues need a 3C glue guy of that ilk. FO dot may not be as strong but he needs to kill penalties, provide top-6 depth, and boost that 3rd line goal scoring.
STL fan in MN
Forum User
Posts: 2684
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm

Re: Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Post by STL fan in MN »

TheJackBurton wrote: 26 Aug 2025 09:13 am
STL fan in MN wrote: 26 Aug 2025 09:06 am I wasn’t super interested in Suter as I didn’t want to way overpay a guy for having 1 career year. But that was based on the assumption he was going to require something like 4 years at $5M to get him signed. To get him at 2 years at $4.125M is more than fair. Very happy we got him as he adds much needed center depth.

I view this as pretty similar to the Bozak signing years ago. Not a star signing but a very solid player that will play an important role and helps slot others where they need to be. I love Sunny for what he is but at this point in his career, he shouldn’t have been playing 3C.

As for this article, it’s just a Canucks fan blog quoting a Blues fam blog. But that said, I did find it a bit surprising the Canucks couldn’t find a way to keep this guy as they could really use him too. But perhaps all the turmoil in Vancouver made it so Pius was more than open to a new opportunity, idk.
There's a lot to be said for not wanting to be in an organization when the front office is in absolute turmoil.

Vancouver is the poster child for what happens when the players run the team. You have Pettersson who pouted until Miller was traded (although based on reports Miller isn't exactly a beloved clubhouse individual) and now you have Hughes already telling you he isn't re-signing there and that he wants to play with his brothers in NJ.

People can (A female canine animal, especially a dog) and moan about Army all they want, but we haven't ever seen dysfunction like that in the Blues locker room.
Very true. And it’s not like the potential for dysfunction hasn’t been there. Tarasenko requested a trade and we took nearly a year to honor it. That really could’ve blown up and turned into a big story but it didn’t. Some of the credit for that goes to Tarasenko himself but Army and the org as a whole did a good job of not letting it get out of hand.

Vancouver just has a lot of weirdness going on. Miller sounds like a piece of work but so does Petersson IMO. They’re probably going to have to trade Hughes, they’re the only team in the league without a dedicated practice facility, it’s super expensive there…beautify city but it certainly wouldn’t be my first choice of a city or org if I was a player either.
STL fan in MN
Forum User
Posts: 2684
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm

Re: Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Post by STL fan in MN »

DawgDad wrote: 26 Aug 2025 09:20 am
STL fan in MN wrote: 26 Aug 2025 09:06 am I wasn’t super interested in Suter as I didn’t want to way overpay a guy for having 1 career year. But that was based on the assumption he was going to require something like 4 years at $5M to get him signed. To get him at 2 years at $4.125M is more than fair. Very happy we got him as he adds much needed center depth.

I view this as pretty similar to the Bozak signing years ago. Not a star signing but a very solid player that will play an important role and helps slot others where they need to be. I love Sunny for what he is but at this point in his career, he shouldn’t have been playing 3C.

As for this article, it’s just a Canucks fan blog quoting a Blues fam blog. But that said, I did find it a bit surprising the Canucks couldn’t find a way to keep this guy as they could really use him too. But perhaps all the turmoil in Vancouver made it so Pius was more than open to a new opportunity, idk.
Hoping Bozak is a good comp, Blues need a 3C glue guy of that ilk. FO dot may not be as strong but he needs to kill penalties, provide top-6 depth, and boost that 3rd line goal scoring.
Yep, Bozak isn’t a perfect comp simply because he was good at faceoffs and Suter isn’t but in terms of impact to the org, I’m hoping they’ll be similar.

I don’t expect Suter to score 25 goals again but he should score a heck of a lot more than Sunny’s 6!
BalotelliMassive
Forum User
Posts: 1026
Joined: 24 May 2024 10:31 am

Re: Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Post by BalotelliMassive »

TheJackBurton wrote: 26 Aug 2025 09:13 am There's a lot to be said for not wanting to be in an organization when the front office is in absolute turmoil.
Yup - dude played on a dying Blackhawk team and then he went to another in Detroit. He should thrive in St. Louis based on having better coaching alone.
TheJackBurton
Forum User
Posts: 2596
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm

Re: Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Post by TheJackBurton »

BalotelliMassive wrote: 26 Aug 2025 10:04 am
TheJackBurton wrote: 26 Aug 2025 09:13 am There's a lot to be said for not wanting to be in an organization when the front office is in absolute turmoil.
Yup - dude played on a dying Blackhawk team and then he went to another in Detroit. He should thrive in St. Louis based on having better coaching alone.
Forgot about the Detroit stop. That was a rough one. At least with Chicago he was just entering the league and getting his feet wet.
lidstrom5
Forum User
Posts: 2097
Joined: 28 May 2018 10:06 am

Re: Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Post by lidstrom5 »

TheJackBurton wrote: 26 Aug 2025 09:13 am
STL fan in MN wrote: 26 Aug 2025 09:06 am I wasn’t super interested in Suter as I didn’t want to way overpay a guy for having 1 career year. But that was based on the assumption he was going to require something like 4 years at $5M to get him signed. To get him at 2 years at $4.125M is more than fair. Very happy we got him as he adds much needed center depth.

I view this as pretty similar to the Bozak signing years ago. Not a star signing but a very solid player that will play an important role and helps slot others where they need to be. I love Sunny for what he is but at this point in his career, he shouldn’t have been playing 3C.

As for this article, it’s just a Canucks fan blog quoting a Blues fam blog. But that said, I did find it a bit surprising the Canucks couldn’t find a way to keep this guy as they could really use him too. But perhaps all the turmoil in Vancouver made it so Pius was more than open to a new opportunity, idk.
There's a lot to be said for not wanting to be in an organization when the front office is in absolute turmoil.

Vancouver is the poster child for what happens when the players run the team. You have Pettersson who pouted until Miller was traded (although based on reports Miller isn't exactly a beloved clubhouse individual) and now you have Hughes already telling you he isn't re-signing there and that he wants to play with his brothers in NJ.

People can (A female canine animal, especially a dog) and moan about Army all they want, but we haven't ever seen dysfunction like that in the Blues locker room.

If it wasn't for an idiot named Holland Hughes would be in Detroit.
TheJackBurton
Forum User
Posts: 2596
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm

Re: Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Post by TheJackBurton »

STL fan in MN wrote: 26 Aug 2025 09:58 am
TheJackBurton wrote: 26 Aug 2025 09:13 am
STL fan in MN wrote: 26 Aug 2025 09:06 am I wasn’t super interested in Suter as I didn’t want to way overpay a guy for having 1 career year. But that was based on the assumption he was going to require something like 4 years at $5M to get him signed. To get him at 2 years at $4.125M is more than fair. Very happy we got him as he adds much needed center depth.

I view this as pretty similar to the Bozak signing years ago. Not a star signing but a very solid player that will play an important role and helps slot others where they need to be. I love Sunny for what he is but at this point in his career, he shouldn’t have been playing 3C.

As for this article, it’s just a Canucks fan blog quoting a Blues fam blog. But that said, I did find it a bit surprising the Canucks couldn’t find a way to keep this guy as they could really use him too. But perhaps all the turmoil in Vancouver made it so Pius was more than open to a new opportunity, idk.
There's a lot to be said for not wanting to be in an organization when the front office is in absolute turmoil.

Vancouver is the poster child for what happens when the players run the team. You have Pettersson who pouted until Miller was traded (although based on reports Miller isn't exactly a beloved clubhouse individual) and now you have Hughes already telling you he isn't re-signing there and that he wants to play with his brothers in NJ.

People can (A female canine animal, especially a dog) and moan about Army all they want, but we haven't ever seen dysfunction like that in the Blues locker room.
Very true. And it’s not like the potential for dysfunction hasn’t been there. Tarasenko requested a trade and we took nearly a year to honor it. That really could’ve blown up and turned into a big story but it didn’t. Some of the credit for that goes to Tarasenko himself but Army and the org as a whole did a good job of not letting it get out of hand.

Vancouver just has a lot of weirdness going on. Miller sounds like a piece of work but so does Petersson IMO. They’re probably going to have to trade Hughes, they’re the only team in the league without a dedicated practice facility, it’s super expensive there…beautify city but it certainly wouldn’t be my first choice of a city or org if I was a player either.
Yep, especially after he was left unprotected in the expansion draft. I give Vladi credit for that, not only did he not pout, he went out and had a really fantastic season.

When he didn't get traded in the off season though you could see things started to go south, but to both of their credit they kept it out of the papers and evidently out of the locker room.

Part of that comes with the stability in the front office though and Tom Stillman and Co making sure everyone is aware of who is in charge and who they will back when push comes to shove. With Vancouvers constant revolving door of GM's head coaches and I would imagine some front office personnel its extremely hard to put that message forward.
bstpete11
Forum User
Posts: 14
Joined: 03 Jun 2025 11:52 am

Re: Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Post by bstpete11 »

I think Suter is going to be a good player for the Blues, but in no way should a 29 year old 3rd line center with a career high 46 points be referred to as a "breakout star". I'm sure Vancouver wishes they still had him, but I don't think this is going to be a huge regret for them.
StlFanInVA
Forum User
Posts: 33
Joined: 06 Jul 2018 06:41 am

Re: Breakout Star Proving The Canucks Should Have Signed Him When They Had the Chance

Post by StlFanInVA »

TheJackBurton wrote: 26 Aug 2025 09:13 am
STL fan in MN wrote: 26 Aug 2025 09:06 am I wasn’t super interested in Suter as I didn’t want to way overpay a guy for having 1 career year. But that was based on the assumption he was going to require something like 4 years at $5M to get him signed. To get him at 2 years at $4.125M is more than fair. Very happy we got him as he adds much needed center depth.

I view this as pretty similar to the Bozak signing years ago. Not a star signing but a very solid player that will play an important role and helps slot others where they need to be. I love Sunny for what he is but at this point in his career, he shouldn’t have been playing 3C.

As for this article, it’s just a Canucks fan blog quoting a Blues fam blog. But that said, I did find it a bit surprising the Canucks couldn’t find a way to keep this guy as they could really use him too. But perhaps all the turmoil in Vancouver made it so Pius was more than open to a new opportunity, idk.
There's a lot to be said for not wanting to be in an organization when the front office is in absolute turmoil.

Vancouver is the poster child for what happens when the players run the team. You have Pettersson who pouted until Miller was traded (although based on reports Miller isn't exactly a beloved clubhouse individual) and now you have Hughes already telling you he isn't re-signing there and that he wants to play with his brothers in NJ.

People can (A female canine animal, especially a dog) and moan about Army all they want, but we haven't ever seen dysfunction like that in the Blues locker room.
I was thinking very similarly and also thought the way the Blues gave Broberg and Holloway a chance to succeed like they did, may also look favorable to other players, on the outside, thinking that they've been under utilized and could excel with the opportunity as well.
Post Reply