What could have been with McGreevy and Wetherholt
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
What could have been with McGreevy and Wetherholt
In retrospect, the season could have been much better for the Cardinals had McGreevy been in the starting rotation and Wetherholt been the starting 3B from the start of the season. Before you get snarky, think about the possible impact these two might actually have made.
Last edited by Shady on 20 Aug 2025 14:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 13101
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
Re: What could have been with McGreevy and Wetherholt
Dang, even better than Ohtani! I honestly didn’t even realize Wetherholt pitched.
Re: What could have been with McGreevy and Wetherholt
Wetherholt in the starting rotation? interesting thoughtShady wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 14:01 pm In retrospect, the season could have been much better for the Cardinals had Wetherholt been in the starting rotation and Wetherholt been the starting 3B from the start of the season. Before you get snarky, think about the possible impact these two might actually have made.
Re: What could have been with McGreevy and Wetherholt
So you see JJ as an Ohtani type that takes the ball every fifth day and plays the field the rest of the week?Shady wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 14:01 pm In retrospect, the season could have been much better for the Cardinals had Wetherholt been in the starting rotation and Wetherholt been the starting 3B from the start of the season. Before you get snarky, think about the possible impact these two might actually have made.
Re: What could have been with McGreevy and Wetherholt
Well, your momma sure does care about your schooling, son
Heee Heee Heee
Heee Heee Heee
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 893
- Joined: 24 May 2024 12:48 pm
Re: What could have been with McGreevy and Wetherholt
I've been pushing all year both JJ and Koperniak to be in the rotation. It would have really solidified the top of the rotation.
Last edited by RamFan08NY on 20 Aug 2025 14:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: What could have been with McGreevy and Wetherholt
The edit feature was definitely needed on this one. Thanks to those paying such close attention.Now that it's corrected. Please just comment on the subject of the OP.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 13101
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
Re: What could have been with McGreevy and Wetherholt
Guru, I teed that one up for you to pounce on. Now please comment of the revised edition.
Last edited by Shady on 20 Aug 2025 14:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: What could have been with McGreevy and Wetherholt
do you pay attention at all to baseball?
He would've never been in the lineup out of Spring Training....1 Hit, 1 (bleep) hit. And before you say anything, no one is listening anyways.
It Happens.
What? [shirt]?
Yeah
Re: What could have been with McGreevy and Wetherholt
"In restrospect" stooge. Also, you recklessly assume "no one is listening anyways'. Wrong, the obsessed crowd, led by you, follow every single word I post.
Re: What could have been with McGreevy and Wetherholt
I've never heard of half of these guys, and the ones I do know are way past their prime.Shady wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 14:15 pm"In restrospect" stooge. Also, you recklessly assume "no one is listening anyways'. Wrong, the obsessed crowd, led by you, follow every single word I post.
Most of these guys never had a prime.
That's all I have to say about that.
Re: What could have been with McGreevy and Wetherholt
The only safe assumption is that JJ needed to be on the trajectory he was on to get where he is now.
Starting off the season in MLB may have gone ok or it may have destroyed him. It's a risk not worth taking.
Starting off the season in MLB may have gone ok or it may have destroyed him. It's a risk not worth taking.