Nathan Church

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Cusecards
Forum User
Posts: 10156
Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am

Re: Nathan Church

Post by Cusecards »

rockondlouie wrote: 13 Aug 2025 12:09 pm
Cusecards wrote: 13 Aug 2025 11:30 am
rockondlouie wrote: 13 Aug 2025 10:31 am
Cusecards wrote: 13 Aug 2025 09:31 am
rockondlouie wrote: 13 Aug 2025 08:40 am
Charles King wrote: 12 Aug 2025 16:25 pm Scott needs to work on bunting
If he could get a few bunt hits a week
That and hitting down on the ball more often (picking his moments when to muscle up) to utilize his great speed.
Yes!
It pains me every time he hits a lazy fly ball.
He should be wracking up IF hits which then turn into doubles!
I confess to having zero knowledge of Church other than his stats which are impressive.
Too bad he doesn’t hit RH.
Changes coming in the offseason. Nootbaar to me is redundant and a tease.
We are overloaded already with LH bats and more(JJ/Crooks) on the way.
If Arenado is still here(and that is becoming more and more likely) the arrival of JJ pushes Donovan to the OF. You also have Burleson who is a superior hitter to Noot.
And you also have Gorman who despite his frustrations I’d certainly keep over Noot.
Again... wish Church hit RH.
Remember the bet Whitey had w/Ozzie? :wink:

Hopefully they have someone work w/him on both is bunting and hitting down on the ball more often this spring, keeping the ball on the ground more while pressuring infielders into rushed errors or infield hits!
No....I don’t remember the bet with Ozzie.
Maybe we need the Lou Brown Treatment used with Willie Mays Hayes?
$1 for Whitey each ball Ozzie hit in the air............$1 for Ozzie for each ball he kept on the ground or was a hit.

Ozzie always said he "cleaned up"! :lol:
Good reminder.
Thanks Rock!
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 11602
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Nathan Church

Post by rockondlouie »

Cusecards wrote: 13 Aug 2025 12:42 pm
rockondlouie wrote: 13 Aug 2025 12:09 pm
Cusecards wrote: 13 Aug 2025 11:30 am
rockondlouie wrote: 13 Aug 2025 10:31 am
Cusecards wrote: 13 Aug 2025 09:31 am
rockondlouie wrote: 13 Aug 2025 08:40 am
Charles King wrote: 12 Aug 2025 16:25 pm Scott needs to work on bunting
If he could get a few bunt hits a week
That and hitting down on the ball more often (picking his moments when to muscle up) to utilize his great speed.
Yes!
It pains me every time he hits a lazy fly ball.
He should be wracking up IF hits which then turn into doubles!
I confess to having zero knowledge of Church other than his stats which are impressive.
Too bad he doesn’t hit RH.
Changes coming in the offseason. Nootbaar to me is redundant and a tease.
We are overloaded already with LH bats and more(JJ/Crooks) on the way.
If Arenado is still here(and that is becoming more and more likely) the arrival of JJ pushes Donovan to the OF. You also have Burleson who is a superior hitter to Noot.
And you also have Gorman who despite his frustrations I’d certainly keep over Noot.
Again... wish Church hit RH.
Remember the bet Whitey had w/Ozzie? :wink:

Hopefully they have someone work w/him on both is bunting and hitting down on the ball more often this spring, keeping the ball on the ground more while pressuring infielders into rushed errors or infield hits!
No....I don’t remember the bet with Ozzie.
Maybe we need the Lou Brown Treatment used with Willie Mays Hayes?
$1 for Whitey each ball Ozzie hit in the air............$1 for Ozzie for each ball he kept on the ground or was a hit.

Ozzie always said he "cleaned up"! :lol:
Good reminder.
Thanks Rock!
:wink:
jbrach
Forum User
Posts: 597
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:33 pm

Re: Nathan Church

Post by jbrach »

Futuregm2 wrote: 12 Aug 2025 16:17 pm
clayton888 wrote: 12 Aug 2025 16:14 pm I don’t understand why Church hasn’t been promoted and playing centerfield. He has torn up AAA/AA and plays at least as good an outfield as Scott and Scott, as the Fox announcers said last Friday, is the second worst offensive producer in MLB. It’s past time to move on there and give Church a six week look.
If he plays at least as good of an OF as Scott then he must be the best CF in the game. Scott ranks 3rd in OAA among all MLB OFers behind PCA and Ceddanne Rafaela.

Scott’s biggest issue right now is power. His BB rate is nearly 10%, he has 31 SBs in 33 attempts, and he’s playing a stellar CF defense. If he could hit for any power (.307 SLG%), he’d be fine.
at this point scott is not a major league starting CF....his OPS is that of a pitcher
greyhawk
Forum User
Posts: 670
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:34 pm

Re: Nathan Church

Post by greyhawk »

Wattage wrote: 13 Aug 2025 07:52 am
greyhawk wrote: 12 Aug 2025 18:38 pm i realize he isn't on the 40 man roster but why are Hampson and Siani on it still?? this one is baffling as to why he hasn't gotten some run.
Cuz all hampson is askednto do is ride the bench and be defensive sub or pinch runner. You want to bring up a rookie to ride the bench and just be a defensive sub and pinch runner?
nope - was just pointing out that if church not being on the 40 man is why they aren't bringing him up to play him those two are options a and b to be removed from the 40 man roster.
Basil Shabazz
Forum User
Posts: 1247
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Nathan Church

Post by Basil Shabazz »

greyhawk wrote: 13 Aug 2025 14:06 pm
Wattage wrote: 13 Aug 2025 07:52 am
greyhawk wrote: 12 Aug 2025 18:38 pm i realize he isn't on the 40 man roster but why are Hampson and Siani on it still?? this one is baffling as to why he hasn't gotten some run.
Cuz all hampson is askednto do is ride the bench and be defensive sub or pinch runner. You want to bring up a rookie to ride the bench and just be a defensive sub and pinch runner?
nope - was just pointing out that if church not being on the 40 man is why they aren't bringing him up to play him those two are options a and b to be removed from the 40 man roster.
He is going to have to be added to the 40-man anyway, or he would be left unprotected.
Futuregm2
Forum User
Posts: 7832
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm

Re: Nathan Church

Post by Futuregm2 »

jbrach wrote: 13 Aug 2025 13:57 pm
Futuregm2 wrote: 12 Aug 2025 16:17 pm
clayton888 wrote: 12 Aug 2025 16:14 pm I don’t understand why Church hasn’t been promoted and playing centerfield. He has torn up AAA/AA and plays at least as good an outfield as Scott and Scott, as the Fox announcers said last Friday, is the second worst offensive producer in MLB. It’s past time to move on there and give Church a six week look.
If he plays at least as good of an OF as Scott then he must be the best CF in the game. Scott ranks 3rd in OAA among all MLB OFers behind PCA and Ceddanne Rafaela.

Scott’s biggest issue right now is power. His BB rate is nearly 10%, he has 31 SBs in 33 attempts, and he’s playing a stellar CF defense. If he could hit for any power (.307 SLG%), he’d be fine.
at this point scott is not a major league starting CF....his OPS is that of a pitcher
It’s not THAT bad. It’s still above .600. And his OBP of .309 (entering today) with his speed and defense is fine. There are worse hitters hitting for division leaders that don’t have the same level of defense or speed that Scott has. Which is why his WAR is one of the best on the team.

3B Joey Ortiz, Milwaukee: .610 OPS
SS Trey Sweeney, Detroit: .577 OPS
LF Michael Conforto, LA Dodgers: .627 OPS
CF Victor Scott II, STL: .618 OPS
CF Tyrone Taylor, NY Mets: .546 OPS
cosmo.kramer
Forum User
Posts: 365
Joined: 18 Jul 2025 17:51 pm

Re: Nathan Church

Post by cosmo.kramer »

Combing through some game logs for Church...

Across 50 starts from mid-April to mid-June in Peoria in 2023, Church reached base safely in 48 games. He hit .359/.442/.467/.909 (160 wRC+) over ~225 PA's during that stretch, with more bb than k

He reached base safely in 19 of 20 games in April in Springfield in 2024, hitting .349/.402/.512/.914 (150 wRC+) over ~100 PA's, with more bb than k. Won POTM for the month. Just as a funny coincidence, he also hit .341/.405/.515/.920 across 3 seasons at UC Irvine. What are the odds of that batting line, ha

May 2025 in Springfield he hit .357/.407/.602/1.009 (175 wRC+) over ~100 PA's, with more bb than k. Won POTM for the month

June 2025 in Memphis he hit .358/.435/.617/1.052 (175 wRC+) over ~100 PA's, with more bb than k

Obviously not this good all the time, but he has shown glimpses of the bat
Wattage
Forum User
Posts: 1773
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:54 pm

Re: Nathan Church

Post by Wattage »

Futuregm2 wrote: 13 Aug 2025 14:11 pm
jbrach wrote: 13 Aug 2025 13:57 pm
Futuregm2 wrote: 12 Aug 2025 16:17 pm
clayton888 wrote: 12 Aug 2025 16:14 pm I don’t understand why Church hasn’t been promoted and playing centerfield. He has torn up AAA/AA and plays at least as good an outfield as Scott and Scott, as the Fox announcers said last Friday, is the second worst offensive producer in MLB. It’s past time to move on there and give Church a six week look.
If he plays at least as good of an OF as Scott then he must be the best CF in the game. Scott ranks 3rd in OAA among all MLB OFers behind PCA and Ceddanne Rafaela.

Scott’s biggest issue right now is power. His BB rate is nearly 10%, he has 31 SBs in 33 attempts, and he’s playing a stellar CF defense. If he could hit for any power (.307 SLG%), he’d be fine.
at this point scott is not a major league starting CF....his OPS is that of a pitcher
It’s not THAT bad. It’s still above .600. And his OBP of .309 (entering today) with his speed and defense is fine. There are worse hitters hitting for division leaders that don’t have the same level of defense or speed that Scott has. Which is why his WAR is one of the best on the team.

3B Joey Ortiz, Milwaukee: .610 OPS
SS Trey Sweeney, Detroit: .577 OPS
LF Michael Conforto, LA Dodgers: .627 OPS
CF Victor Scott II, STL: .618 OPS
CF Tyrone Taylor, NY Mets: .546 OPS
Sweeney and taylor are not primary starters for the mets and detroit tigers.

Sweeney has only like 264 at bats and only has as much as he does cuz of injuries and he wasnoptioned for part of this year. Baez is the primary ss for tigers when they are full strength.

The mets traded for cedric mullins to demote tyrone taylor from his starting job.

Edit: additionally- those other teams werent also starting pedro pages as their catcher too as well as sub. 700 ops arenado as their 3b
Last edited by Wattage on 13 Aug 2025 14:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Janssen
Forum User
Posts: 315
Joined: 07 Jan 2021 14:45 pm

Re: Nathan Church

Post by Janssen »

Koperniak has been playing all year with a nagging injury. Since healed he has been killing it down at Memphis.
cosmo.kramer
Forum User
Posts: 365
Joined: 18 Jul 2025 17:51 pm

Re: Nathan Church

Post by cosmo.kramer »

Church first at bat next inning. Hoping he looks comfortable up there
cosmo.kramer
Forum User
Posts: 365
Joined: 18 Jul 2025 17:51 pm

Re: Nathan Church

Post by cosmo.kramer »

cosmo.kramer wrote: 17 Aug 2025 13:56 pm Church first at bat next inning. Hoping he looks comfortable up there
Looks a little anxious so far, but some solid contact

105.5 exit velocity
98.3
96.4
Cusecards
Forum User
Posts: 10156
Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am

Re: Nathan Church

Post by Cusecards »

cosmo.kramer wrote: 17 Aug 2025 15:27 pm
cosmo.kramer wrote: 17 Aug 2025 13:56 pm Church first at bat next inning. Hoping he looks comfortable up there
Looks a little anxious so far, but some solid contact

105.5 exit velocity
98.3
96.4
Solid AB’s and deserved a better fate.
Melville
Forum User
Posts: 3977
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:16 pm

Re: Nathan Church

Post by Melville »

Cusecards wrote: 17 Aug 2025 15:29 pm
cosmo.kramer wrote: 17 Aug 2025 15:27 pm
cosmo.kramer wrote: 17 Aug 2025 13:56 pm Church first at bat next inning. Hoping he looks comfortable up there
Looks a little anxious so far, but some solid contact

105.5 exit velocity
98.3
96.4
Solid AB’s and deserved a better fate.
Took quality PA's.
Looked ready for the moment.
Will be an interesting 10 days.
stlbirdlover
Forum User
Posts: 612
Joined: 24 May 2024 19:53 pm

Re: Nathan Church

Post by stlbirdlover »

No help today 0-4 fits right in with the rest of the team.
Carp4Cy
Forum User
Posts: 2219
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:38 pm

Re: Nathan Church

Post by Carp4Cy »

Melville wrote: 17 Aug 2025 17:47 pm
Cusecards wrote: 17 Aug 2025 15:29 pm
cosmo.kramer wrote: 17 Aug 2025 15:27 pm
cosmo.kramer wrote: 17 Aug 2025 13:56 pm Church first at bat next inning. Hoping he looks comfortable up there
Looks a little anxious so far, but some solid contact

105.5 exit velocity
98.3
96.4
Solid AB’s and deserved a better fate.
Took quality PA's.
Looked ready for the moment.
Will be an interesting 10 days.
He forgot launch angle? 105 EV and the optimal launch angle puts it over the wall in every park.
cosmo.kramer
Forum User
Posts: 365
Joined: 18 Jul 2025 17:51 pm

Re: Nathan Church

Post by cosmo.kramer »

Carp4Cy wrote: 17 Aug 2025 18:08 pm
Melville wrote: 17 Aug 2025 17:47 pm
Cusecards wrote: 17 Aug 2025 15:29 pm
cosmo.kramer wrote: 17 Aug 2025 15:27 pm
cosmo.kramer wrote: 17 Aug 2025 13:56 pm Church first at bat next inning. Hoping he looks comfortable up there
Looks a little anxious so far, but some solid contact

105.5 exit velocity
98.3
96.4
Solid AB’s and deserved a better fate.
Took quality PA's.
Looked ready for the moment.
Will be an interesting 10 days.
He forgot launch angle? 105 EV and the optimal launch angle puts it over the wall in every park.
He hit a 442ft bomb the other night. I think we'll see some hits soon
Post Reply