I mean, you are right on him being different, but you never know with prospects. My feeling is that one of these options can hurt a players development, while the other option just delays it. If they were gonna be great anyway. Some of it has nothing to do with Wetherholt himself either.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:43 pm I wasn't in favor of any of those things, but surely you can see the difference between what JJ Wetherholt is doing, and who he is as a player, compared to those other guys and those situations.
Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1173
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:17 pm
Re: Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
I know that there's no guarantees. I don't guarantee that Wetherholt will be great right away either. The reason I say he's different is because he came out of college a complete hitter, possible 1-1 draft pick. He started at AA this year and dominated. He got promoted to AAA and was even better after the power started to come.PadsFS07 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 16:00 pmI mean, you are right on him being different, but you never know with prospects. My feeling is that one of these options can hurt a players development, while the other option just delays it. If they were gonna be great anyway. Some of it has nothing to do with Wetherholt himself either.
But I could also make the argument that holding him back and delaying his development hurts both him and the team. If you call him up this September, maybe he struggles initially. But at least he gets that taste of baseball at this level and knows what he has to do to make himself ready for next year because, and I think we all know that barring injury, he's making the team out of the spring next year. Let's not kid ourselves.
So I would want my top prospect, one of the top prospects in the game, who is as close as you can get to the majors right now, to get a taste so that he can hopefully be at his best next year. And that's good for the team too. The team is basically done this year. But who knows next year? I'd rather him struggle now rather than later.
But yes, I do agree that some of it has nothing to do with him. And if someone makes the argument that there's just not the playing time for him right now, especially if Arenado comes back, I don't like it, but I can see the point. But with the other stuff, the guy has done nothing but dominate. He's right there. Call him up.
Re: Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
I think him coming back does meddle with playing time. Saggese is lookjng like hes finally hitting again.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 16:27 pmI know that there's no guarantees. I don't guarantee that Wetherholt will be great right away either. The reason I say he's different is because he came out of college a complete hitter, possible 1-1 draft pick. He started at AA this year and dominated. He got promoted to AAA and was even better after the power started to come.PadsFS07 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 16:00 pmI mean, you are right on him being different, but you never know with prospects. My feeling is that one of these options can hurt a players development, while the other option just delays it. If they were gonna be great anyway. Some of it has nothing to do with Wetherholt himself either.
But I could also make the argument that holding him back and delaying his development hurts both him and the team. If you call him up this September, maybe he struggles initially. But at least he gets that taste of baseball at this level and knows what he has to do to make himself ready for next year because, and I think we all know that barring injury, he's making the team out of the spring next year. Let's not kid ourselves.
So I would want my top prospect, one of the top prospects in the game, who is as close as you can get to the majors right now, to get a taste so that he can hopefully be at his best next year. And that's good for the team too. The team is basically done this year. But who knows next year? I'd rather him struggle now rather than later.
But yes, I do agree that some of it has nothing to do with him. And if someone makes the argument that there's just not the playing time for him right now, especially if Arenado comes back, I don't like it, but I can see the point. But with the other stuff, the guy has done nothing but dominate. He's right there. Call him up.
Im not sure its 100% wetherholt makes team next year at years beginning. Especially with how crowded 2b could be.
I think since church has to be added this offseason to be protected from 40 man he should come up in september since our outfield production is shaky
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4083
- Joined: 05 May 2020 14:17 pm
Re: Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
So is it 1 position player and 1 pitcher they're planning to call up this September because of that ridiculous rule change 5 years ago?
Church and Matthews? Didn't realize till just now Matthews turns 25 this October.
Church and Matthews? Didn't realize till just now Matthews turns 25 this October.
Re: Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
ExactlyPadsFS07 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 07:28 amHow does it help his growth to speed past AAA? Let him develop. We've rushed every top prospect over the past 10-15 years and all of them struggled with it.bakker wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 06:59 am For the good of his growth and the team overall why wouldn't you want him to get a taste of the majors over the last 30 games or so. (Seems to help Winn). Only prepare him more for next year. Even if the Cards aren't in the WC hunt they'll be playing games that mean a lot to them and just adds that more to his acquired experience. Surely this is a troll job by Mo.
Re: Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
Usually is 1 and 1. You arent allowed to have more pitchers than position players so it cant be 2 pitchers and i doubt its 2 position players.blackinkbiz wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 17:28 pm So is it 1 position player and 1 pitcher they're planning to call up this September because of that ridiculous rule change 5 years ago?
Church and Matthews? Didn't realize till just now Matthews turns 25 this October.
Id have to imagine its church since he has to be added to 40 man anyway and not management doing something stupid and insulting like siani.
Crooks blaze jordan and prieto also all have to be added so they are also possibilities.
Matthews is possible butbhe also doesnt have to be added to 40 man til after 2026 season so dont be surprised if they just call up a mopup roster filler arm.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2397
- Joined: 23 May 2024 22:10 pm
Re: Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
Wetherholt has played 23 games in AAA so far and 114 minor league games in total.
Everyone can wait until Christmas to open their present. There is no need to open it on Thanksgiving.
Ideally, he gets his MLB debut around 01 May so the Cards can keep him from 2026-2032 instead of 2026-2031.
Assuming he's great, wouldn't you rather have him for all of 2032 instead of rushing him to MLB to mop up this lost season.
Promoting him now is equivalent to releasing him after 2031 for no good reason with a year of control left. That is a loser GM move.
Everyone can wait until Christmas to open their present. There is no need to open it on Thanksgiving.
Ideally, he gets his MLB debut around 01 May so the Cards can keep him from 2026-2032 instead of 2026-2031.
Assuming he's great, wouldn't you rather have him for all of 2032 instead of rushing him to MLB to mop up this lost season.
Promoting him now is equivalent to releasing him after 2031 for no good reason with a year of control left. That is a loser GM move.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 293
- Joined: 26 May 2024 17:41 pm
Re: Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
Oakland sure loves their shiny new toy Nick Kurtz, chosen just a few spots before JJ in last year’s draft. Our offense is dead last in runs scored since the All Star break. What’s to say that Wetherholt couldn’t have helped this offense in July and August? We were just 3 games back of the wild card as of Monday.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:24 pm Some of you just love the shiny new toy. Whether it’s requesting Gorman get called up immediately during the 2022 season, or Walker must make the roster out of spring training in 2023, or demanding victor scott be the starting CFer out of spring training this season following a brutal 2024 minor league season, you’re not recognizing patterns. There is no rush. Just let the kid be.
He’ll most certainly be in the 2026 OD lineup.
Sends an awful message to your fanbase when you don’t even try to put the best players already in your organization on the field in a pennant race.
Re: Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
A valid argument could certainly be made for Crooks over Church.Wattage wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 18:15 pmUsually is 1 and 1. You arent allowed to have more pitchers than position players so it cant be 2 pitchers and i doubt its 2 position players.blackinkbiz wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 17:28 pm So is it 1 position player and 1 pitcher they're planning to call up this September because of that ridiculous rule change 5 years ago?
Church and Matthews? Didn't realize till just now Matthews turns 25 this October.
Id have to imagine its church since he has to be added to 40 man anyway and not management doing something stupid and insulting like siani.
Crooks blaze jordan and prieto also all have to be added so they are also possibilities.
Matthews is possible butbhe also doesnt have to be added to 40 man til after 2026 season so dont be surprised if they just call up a mopup roster filler arm.
Although, understandably I suspect people have more positive views in general of church than crooks.
Re: Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
Oakland is 54-69. I don’t think this helps your casepeterman'srealitytour wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 18:38 pmOakland sure loves their shiny new toy Nick Kurtz, chosen just a few spots before JJ in last year’s draft. Our offense is dead last in runs scored since the All Star break. What’s to say that Wetherholt couldn’t have helped this offense in July and August? We were just 3 games back of the wild card as of Monday.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:24 pm Some of you just love the shiny new toy. Whether it’s requesting Gorman get called up immediately during the 2022 season, or Walker must make the roster out of spring training in 2023, or demanding victor scott be the starting CFer out of spring training this season following a brutal 2024 minor league season, you’re not recognizing patterns. There is no rush. Just let the kid be.
He’ll most certainly be in the 2026 OD lineup.
Sends an awful message to your fanbase when you don’t even try to put the best players already in your organization on the field in a pennant race.
Re: Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
If they’re going to have to glove first guys in Winn and Scott, then it’s all good if they have legitimate middle of the order bats.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:52 pmYou make valid points and I agree with all of them but Scott. I like Scott. I wanted to see progression from him and he has progressed not as drastically as some who wanted him to hit .300 and steal 100 this season but he went from .179 to .219 raised his OBP from .221 to .309 because he’s walking more and raised his OPS from .502 to .618 and is also hitting .273 with a .376 OBP and .792 OPS with runners in scoring position and .241 .339 .737 with men on. On top of that he’s elite on defense and on the bases. I have no problem with him playing center and batting ninth next season. A lot of teams would love to have Scott batting ninth for themwoofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:34 pmIt wasn’t the right move for the player. Typically, you need to be good in the minors before you can be productive in the majors. Some people on here salivated over spring training way too much, and chose to ignore a major regression over a larger and more reliable sample size. And those same people will do it next year if Doyle or Crooks or Baez or Bernal has a good ST.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:26 pmOr saying Scott should skip AA to the majors based on 44 spring plate appearances. Although it was fine Scott making the team this season he’s doing what siani could have done but with more stolen baseswoofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:24 pm Some of you just love the shiny new toy. Whether it’s requesting Gorman get called up immediately during the 2022 season, or Walker must make the roster out of spring training in 2023, or demanding victor scott be the starting CFer out of spring training this season following a brutal 2024 minor league season, you’re not recognizing patterns. There is no rush. Just let the kid be.
He’ll most certainly be in the 2026 OD lineup.
I really hope the new regime is able to recognize that a guy who goes from .290 to .212 in the minors needs to start the next season….in the minors.
While Nootbaar hasn’t done himself any favors this season, he should have been the starting CFer. Gorman would have a lot more ABs by now. He and Walker were the poster boys for the runway garbage.
I don’t know how many sub 100 ops+ players you can really have but I’d say two is close to the limit.
Re: Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
Walker was a top 5 prospect, so no, I don’t see much of a difference. Now, jj and Walker are pretty much the same age so there is that. If they bring him up in September then I’m fine with it but it’s not a hill I’d die on. Again, fully expect him in the OD lineup next season. Would be great if they could land on a position for him around the winter meetings.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:43 pmI wasn't in favor of any of those things, but surely you can see the difference between what JJ Wetherholt is doing, and who he is as a player, compared to those other guys and those situations.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:24 pm Some of you just love the shiny new toy. Whether it’s requesting Gorman get called up immediately during the 2022 season, or Walker must make the roster out of spring training in 2023, or demanding victor scott be the starting CFer out of spring training this season following a brutal 2024 minor league season, you’re not recognizing patterns. There is no rush. Just let the kid be.
He’ll most certainly be in the 2026 OD lineup.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5467
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
Well Gorman and walker can’t field or hit I would complain about them before I complain about elite defensive guyswoofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 19:02 pmIf they’re going to have to glove first guys in Winn and Scott, then it’s all good if they have legitimate middle of the order bats.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:52 pmYou make valid points and I agree with all of them but Scott. I like Scott. I wanted to see progression from him and he has progressed not as drastically as some who wanted him to hit .300 and steal 100 this season but he went from .179 to .219 raised his OBP from .221 to .309 because he’s walking more and raised his OPS from .502 to .618 and is also hitting .273 with a .376 OBP and .792 OPS with runners in scoring position and .241 .339 .737 with men on. On top of that he’s elite on defense and on the bases. I have no problem with him playing center and batting ninth next season. A lot of teams would love to have Scott batting ninth for themwoofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:34 pmIt wasn’t the right move for the player. Typically, you need to be good in the minors before you can be productive in the majors. Some people on here salivated over spring training way too much, and chose to ignore a major regression over a larger and more reliable sample size. And those same people will do it next year if Doyle or Crooks or Baez or Bernal has a good ST.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:26 pmOr saying Scott should skip AA to the majors based on 44 spring plate appearances. Although it was fine Scott making the team this season he’s doing what siani could have done but with more stolen baseswoofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:24 pm Some of you just love the shiny new toy. Whether it’s requesting Gorman get called up immediately during the 2022 season, or Walker must make the roster out of spring training in 2023, or demanding victor scott be the starting CFer out of spring training this season following a brutal 2024 minor league season, you’re not recognizing patterns. There is no rush. Just let the kid be.
He’ll most certainly be in the 2026 OD lineup.
I really hope the new regime is able to recognize that a guy who goes from .290 to .212 in the minors needs to start the next season….in the minors.
While Nootbaar hasn’t done himself any favors this season, he should have been the starting CFer. Gorman would have a lot more ABs by now. He and Walker were the poster boys for the runway garbage.
I don’t know how many sub 100 ops+ players you can really have but I’d say two is close to the limit.
Re: Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
Correct.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 19:05 pmWalker was a top 5 prospect, so no, I don’t see much of a difference. Now, jj and Walker are pretty much the same age so there is that. If they bring him up in September then I’m fine with it but it’s not a hill I’d die on. Again, fully expect him in the OD lineup next season. Would be great if they could land on a position for him around the winter meetings.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:43 pmI wasn't in favor of any of those things, but surely you can see the difference between what JJ Wetherholt is doing, and who he is as a player, compared to those other guys and those situations.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:24 pm Some of you just love the shiny new toy. Whether it’s requesting Gorman get called up immediately during the 2022 season, or Walker must make the roster out of spring training in 2023, or demanding victor scott be the starting CFer out of spring training this season following a brutal 2024 minor league season, you’re not recognizing patterns. There is no rush. Just let the kid be.
He’ll most certainly be in the 2026 OD lineup.
Betting on one specific minor league prospect to turn around an organization's trajectory is a fool's errand.
As I have correctly and consistency explained to all, a winning roster is created by assembling pieces which result in the sum being greater than the combined parts.
And that begins by not making foolish 40 man roster decisions unnecessarily.
Wetherholt is not the picture, he is one piece of the puzzle.
Re: Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
Yes. Gorman and Walker are supposed to be middle of the order bats that would help make Winn and Scott acceptable. I, for one, still would not give up on either.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 19:08 pmWell Gorman and walker can’t field or hit I would complain about them before I complain about elite defensive guyswoofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 19:02 pmIf they’re going to have to glove first guys in Winn and Scott, then it’s all good if they have legitimate middle of the order bats.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:52 pmYou make valid points and I agree with all of them but Scott. I like Scott. I wanted to see progression from him and he has progressed not as drastically as some who wanted him to hit .300 and steal 100 this season but he went from .179 to .219 raised his OBP from .221 to .309 because he’s walking more and raised his OPS from .502 to .618 and is also hitting .273 with a .376 OBP and .792 OPS with runners in scoring position and .241 .339 .737 with men on. On top of that he’s elite on defense and on the bases. I have no problem with him playing center and batting ninth next season. A lot of teams would love to have Scott batting ninth for themwoofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:34 pmIt wasn’t the right move for the player. Typically, you need to be good in the minors before you can be productive in the majors. Some people on here salivated over spring training way too much, and chose to ignore a major regression over a larger and more reliable sample size. And those same people will do it next year if Doyle or Crooks or Baez or Bernal has a good ST.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:26 pmOr saying Scott should skip AA to the majors based on 44 spring plate appearances. Although it was fine Scott making the team this season he’s doing what siani could have done but with more stolen baseswoofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:24 pm Some of you just love the shiny new toy. Whether it’s requesting Gorman get called up immediately during the 2022 season, or Walker must make the roster out of spring training in 2023, or demanding victor scott be the starting CFer out of spring training this season following a brutal 2024 minor league season, you’re not recognizing patterns. There is no rush. Just let the kid be.
He’ll most certainly be in the 2026 OD lineup.
I really hope the new regime is able to recognize that a guy who goes from .290 to .212 in the minors needs to start the next season….in the minors.
While Nootbaar hasn’t done himself any favors this season, he should have been the starting CFer. Gorman would have a lot more ABs by now. He and Walker were the poster boys for the runway garbage.
I don’t know how many sub 100 ops+ players you can really have but I’d say two is close to the limit.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5467
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Per ESPN Interview Mozeliak, We probably won't get to see JJ Wetherholt this season
Well you like players who can’t hit or field I would prefer players who are elite defensively who can’t hit so I guess I will just agree to disagreewoofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 19:17 pmYes. Gorman and Walker are supposed to be middle of the order bats that would help make Winn and Scott acceptable. I, for one, still would not give up on either.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 19:08 pmWell Gorman and walker can’t field or hit I would complain about them before I complain about elite defensive guyswoofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 19:02 pmIf they’re going to have to glove first guys in Winn and Scott, then it’s all good if they have legitimate middle of the order bats.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:52 pmYou make valid points and I agree with all of them but Scott. I like Scott. I wanted to see progression from him and he has progressed not as drastically as some who wanted him to hit .300 and steal 100 this season but he went from .179 to .219 raised his OBP from .221 to .309 because he’s walking more and raised his OPS from .502 to .618 and is also hitting .273 with a .376 OBP and .792 OPS with runners in scoring position and .241 .339 .737 with men on. On top of that he’s elite on defense and on the bases. I have no problem with him playing center and batting ninth next season. A lot of teams would love to have Scott batting ninth for themwoofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:34 pmIt wasn’t the right move for the player. Typically, you need to be good in the minors before you can be productive in the majors. Some people on here salivated over spring training way too much, and chose to ignore a major regression over a larger and more reliable sample size. And those same people will do it next year if Doyle or Crooks or Baez or Bernal has a good ST.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:26 pmOr saying Scott should skip AA to the majors based on 44 spring plate appearances. Although it was fine Scott making the team this season he’s doing what siani could have done but with more stolen baseswoofy25 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2025 14:24 pm Some of you just love the shiny new toy. Whether it’s requesting Gorman get called up immediately during the 2022 season, or Walker must make the roster out of spring training in 2023, or demanding victor scott be the starting CFer out of spring training this season following a brutal 2024 minor league season, you’re not recognizing patterns. There is no rush. Just let the kid be.
He’ll most certainly be in the 2026 OD lineup.
I really hope the new regime is able to recognize that a guy who goes from .290 to .212 in the minors needs to start the next season….in the minors.
While Nootbaar hasn’t done himself any favors this season, he should have been the starting CFer. Gorman would have a lot more ABs by now. He and Walker were the poster boys for the runway garbage.
I don’t know how many sub 100 ops+ players you can really have but I’d say two is close to the limit.