His OB% has risen 25 pts over his (SSS) 2024, it could happen.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:16 amYeah, how are the rest of his minor league numbers translating to the majors?rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:14 am.344 during minor league careerscoutyjones2 wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:09 amLoL. That's all? Raise his OBP to 330 from 300rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:04 amThank you, no way Church = VSII defensively.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:17 pmIf he plays at least as good of an OF as Scott then he must be the best CF in the game. Scott ranks 3rd in OAA among all MLB OFers behind PCA and Ceddanne Rafaela.clayton888 wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:14 pm I don’t understand why Church hasn’t been promoted and playing centerfield. He has torn up AAA/AA and plays at least as good an outfield as Scott and Scott, as the Fox announcers said last Friday, is the second worst offensive producer in MLB. It’s past time to move on there and give Church a six week look.
Scott’s biggest issue right now is power. His BB rate is nearly 10%, he has 31 SBs in 33 attempts, and he’s playing a stellar CF defense. If he could hit for any power (.307 SLG%), he’d be fine.
I highly doubt Church makes that catch VSII made last night.
And if he could just add bunting to his arsenal, maybe getting 8-10 bunt hits a year, he could steal 50 bases!
All he needs is a .330 OB% to be an asset.![]()
![]()
Toss in those 8-10 bunt hits if ever learns to bunt and he could get there.
Nathan Church
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 11602
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Nathan Church
Re: Nathan Church
Yes!rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 08:40 amThat and hitting down on the ball more often (picking his moments when to muscle up) to utilize his great speed.Charles King wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:25 pm Scott needs to work on bunting
If he could get a few bunt hits a week
It pains me every time he hits a lazy fly ball.
He should be wracking up IF hits which then turn into doubles!
I confess to having zero knowledge of Church other than his stats which are impressive.
Too bad he doesn’t hit RH.
Changes coming in the offseason. Nootbaar to me is redundant and a tease.
We are overloaded already with LH bats and more(JJ/Crooks) on the way.
If Arenado is still here(and that is becoming more and more likely) the arrival of JJ pushes Donovan to the OF. You also have Burleson who is a superior hitter to Noot.
And you also have Gorman who despite his frustrations I’d certainly keep over Noot.
Again... wish Church hit RH.
Re: Nathan Church
What’s crazy also is that Nolan Arenado (12) has as many infield hits as Masyn Winn (7) and VS2 (5) combined this year. Again, I go back to Turang for Milwaukee. He has 16 infield hits. That is 11 more hits than VS2. Now some of that probably has more to do with “luck” than anything. Turang has a 1.55 GB/FB while VS2 has a 1.08 GB/FB. But those 11 more hits sure help play a role in a .338 BABIP rather than a .293 BABIP. An extra 11 hits would have VS2’s average at .253 and OBP at .340+.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:16 amI did, left out the "more" so thanks for the assist.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:11 amWell he’s at 7 right now, so unless you’re meaning 8-10 more, he’ll be in that range. He’s currently tied for 2nd in baseball in bunt hits. However, of the players in the top 10, he has the worst % of bunt hits in the group at 29.2%. His goal for that should be at least 50% next year and probably more like 70%. In the top 10, Lindor is 100%, Altuve is 87.5%, and Mullins is 70%. Those are the 3 highest percentages. Turang for Milwaukee is at 55.6%.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:04 amThank you, no way Church = VSII defensively.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:17 pmIf he plays at least as good of an OF as Scott then he must be the best CF in the game. Scott ranks 3rd in OAA among all MLB OFers behind PCA and Ceddanne Rafaela.clayton888 wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:14 pm I don’t understand why Church hasn’t been promoted and playing centerfield. He has torn up AAA/AA and plays at least as good an outfield as Scott and Scott, as the Fox announcers said last Friday, is the second worst offensive producer in MLB. It’s past time to move on there and give Church a six week look.
Scott’s biggest issue right now is power. His BB rate is nearly 10%, he has 31 SBs in 33 attempts, and he’s playing a stellar CF defense. If he could hit for any power (.307 SLG%), he’d be fine.
I highly doubt Church makes that catch VSII made last night.
And if he could just add bunting to his arsenal, maybe getting 8-10 bunt hits a year, he could steal 50 bases!
All he needs is a .330 OB% to be an asset.
And he absolutely needs some instruction on how to be a better bunter.
Re: Nathan Church
Yup, he's gotta 1) hit the ball on the ground more and 2) stop pulling it as much... save his current swing for runners on and sac fly or force out in playFuturegm2 wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:31 amWhat’s crazy also is that Nolan Arenado (12) has as many infield hits as Masyn Winn (7) and VS2 (5) combined this year. Again, I go back to Turang for Milwaukee. He has 16 infield hits. That is 11 more hits than VS2. Now some of that probably has more to do with “luck” than anything. Turang has a 1.55 GB/FB while VS2 has a 1.08 GB/FB. But those 11 more hits sure help play a role in a .338 BABIP rather than a .293 BABIP. An extra 11 hits would have VS2’s average at .253 and OBP at .340+.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:16 amI did, left out the "more" so thanks for the assist.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:11 amWell he’s at 7 right now, so unless you’re meaning 8-10 more, he’ll be in that range. He’s currently tied for 2nd in baseball in bunt hits. However, of the players in the top 10, he has the worst % of bunt hits in the group at 29.2%. His goal for that should be at least 50% next year and probably more like 70%. In the top 10, Lindor is 100%, Altuve is 87.5%, and Mullins is 70%. Those are the 3 highest percentages. Turang for Milwaukee is at 55.6%.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:04 amThank you, no way Church = VSII defensively.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:17 pmIf he plays at least as good of an OF as Scott then he must be the best CF in the game. Scott ranks 3rd in OAA among all MLB OFers behind PCA and Ceddanne Rafaela.clayton888 wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:14 pm I don’t understand why Church hasn’t been promoted and playing centerfield. He has torn up AAA/AA and plays at least as good an outfield as Scott and Scott, as the Fox announcers said last Friday, is the second worst offensive producer in MLB. It’s past time to move on there and give Church a six week look.
Scott’s biggest issue right now is power. His BB rate is nearly 10%, he has 31 SBs in 33 attempts, and he’s playing a stellar CF defense. If he could hit for any power (.307 SLG%), he’d be fine.
I highly doubt Church makes that catch VSII made last night.
And if he could just add bunting to his arsenal, maybe getting 8-10 bunt hits a year, he could steal 50 bases!
All he needs is a .330 OB% to be an asset.
And he absolutely needs some instruction on how to be a better bunter.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 11602
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Nathan Church
Remember the bet Whitey had w/Ozzie?Cusecards wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:31 amYes!rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 08:40 amThat and hitting down on the ball more often (picking his moments when to muscle up) to utilize his great speed.Charles King wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:25 pm Scott needs to work on bunting
If he could get a few bunt hits a week
It pains me every time he hits a lazy fly ball.
He should be wracking up IF hits which then turn into doubles!
I confess to having zero knowledge of Church other than his stats which are impressive.
Too bad he doesn’t hit RH.
Changes coming in the offseason. Nootbaar to me is redundant and a tease.
We are overloaded already with LH bats and more(JJ/Crooks) on the way.
If Arenado is still here(and that is becoming more and more likely) the arrival of JJ pushes Donovan to the OF. You also have Burleson who is a superior hitter to Noot.
And you also have Gorman who despite his frustrations I’d certainly keep over Noot.
Again... wish Church hit RH.

Hopefully they have someone work w/him on both is bunting and hitting down on the ball more often this spring, keeping the ball on the ground more while pressuring infielders into rushed errors or infield hits!
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 11602
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Nathan Church
Yikes!Futuregm2 wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:31 amWhat’s crazy also is that Nolan Arenado (12) has as many infield hits as Masyn Winn (7) and VS2 (5) combined this year. Again, I go back to Turang for Milwaukee. He has 16 infield hits. That is 11 more hits than VS2. Now some of that probably has more to do with “luck” than anything. Turang has a 1.55 GB/FB while VS2 has a 1.08 GB/FB. But those 11 more hits sure help play a role in a .338 BABIP rather than a .293 BABIP. An extra 11 hits would have VS2’s average at .253 and OBP at .340+.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:16 amI did, left out the "more" so thanks for the assist.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:11 amWell he’s at 7 right now, so unless you’re meaning 8-10 more, he’ll be in that range. He’s currently tied for 2nd in baseball in bunt hits. However, of the players in the top 10, he has the worst % of bunt hits in the group at 29.2%. His goal for that should be at least 50% next year and probably more like 70%. In the top 10, Lindor is 100%, Altuve is 87.5%, and Mullins is 70%. Those are the 3 highest percentages. Turang for Milwaukee is at 55.6%.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:04 amThank you, no way Church = VSII defensively.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:17 pmIf he plays at least as good of an OF as Scott then he must be the best CF in the game. Scott ranks 3rd in OAA among all MLB OFers behind PCA and Ceddanne Rafaela.clayton888 wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:14 pm I don’t understand why Church hasn’t been promoted and playing centerfield. He has torn up AAA/AA and plays at least as good an outfield as Scott and Scott, as the Fox announcers said last Friday, is the second worst offensive producer in MLB. It’s past time to move on there and give Church a six week look.
Scott’s biggest issue right now is power. His BB rate is nearly 10%, he has 31 SBs in 33 attempts, and he’s playing a stellar CF defense. If he could hit for any power (.307 SLG%), he’d be fine.
I highly doubt Church makes that catch VSII made last night.
And if he could just add bunting to his arsenal, maybe getting 8-10 bunt hits a year, he could steal 50 bases!
All he needs is a .330 OB% to be an asset.
And he absolutely needs some instruction on how to be a better bunter.
That should never be given NADO's snail-like 25.5 sprint speed vs VSII's blazing 30.2 and Winn's 28.4!
And hopefully scouty see's those numbers you did on Turang.
VSII can easily get that .330 OB% which could lead to 50 SB's!
Coupled w/his GG caliber defense in CF, he could become an asset from the #9 hole........possibly jetting to the lead-off spot!
Re: Nathan Church
Church has to be added this offseason and will be if hes not added in september and called up already.RunSup wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 08:41 am Church is 25 years old. Approaching Koperniak in prospect age. This happened last year with Koperniak.
Also The Cardinals have Rule V draft protection issues this off season. They have to manage the 40-man. Not sure where Church falls in the Rule V time frame. Buts this is one reason why we likely won't see a Mathews called up In September, health aside.
Rosters only expand by 1 position player and 1 pitcher. Wetherholt is the position player to get called up.
I'd like to see Church in the bigs. But his time looks like spring training.
Re: Nathan Church
Yes but then that means someone else has to ride the bench. Granted scott has had insane amount of playing time compared to others so he could use a few more days off but i dont think they want to bench him completely in a runway season. Burleson and herrera arent gonna sit in one corner of/dh spit. I wouldnt mind noot sitting more in the other of spot but donny may play there alot already ifnthey want to give both gorman and saggese looks.Basil Shabazz wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 08:19 amIf Church were up, it would be to get him a look. Thus, he wouldn't be riding the bench like Hampson.
I wouldnt be surprised if hurch were the september position player callup if its not wetherholt
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 232
- Joined: 24 May 2024 11:01 am
Re: Nathan Church
I am excited to see an OF'er rising through the ranks. I was excited about Koperniak also but then he fell off a cliff this year. I am thoroughly convinced the Cards are doing nothing with this roster this season. There has to be a clearing of the log jam on this team and tough decisions need to be made. The time for potential is gone and the average players need gone. Either the guy hits for power or he hits for average. One of the tow needs to happen on all players taking up spots. a .250 average is not cutting it when the guy also has less than 20HR's. If players have been given a 1,000 AB's or more the team should have a pretty good idea of what kind of hitter they are going to evolve into. I am happy some on here are so happy with Scott's defense but he is not providing a bat from night to night. He needs to at the least understand his position is not guaranteed next year and he will need to show something more in ST and early season 2026. This applies to all these guys also. They need gone in the off season or understand nothing is guaranteed.
Nootbar
Walker
Gorman
Pages
Arenado
Contreras
Not including Donovan or Burleson at this time as they have at least produced to some degree while being yanked around the diamond. Herrera is flashing production while learning a new position. Pozo does not appear to be part of the long term plan. The other guys are what they are fill in's until they produce to earn a spot.
Church should at least be given a look in 2026 and Koperniak for that matter or move on like Baker.
Nootbar
Walker
Gorman
Pages
Arenado
Contreras
Not including Donovan or Burleson at this time as they have at least produced to some degree while being yanked around the diamond. Herrera is flashing production while learning a new position. Pozo does not appear to be part of the long term plan. The other guys are what they are fill in's until they produce to earn a spot.
Church should at least be given a look in 2026 and Koperniak for that matter or move on like Baker.
Re: Nathan Church
A lot ofnthoseninfield hits are where fielder makes an okay play to knock it down but cant field it cleanly to make a throw and with scoring being very conservative in charging errors, none will be charged errors even if a couple but not all should berockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 10:36 amYikes!Futuregm2 wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:31 amWhat’s crazy also is that Nolan Arenado (12) has as many infield hits as Masyn Winn (7) and VS2 (5) combined this year. Again, I go back to Turang for Milwaukee. He has 16 infield hits. That is 11 more hits than VS2. Now some of that probably has more to do with “luck” than anything. Turang has a 1.55 GB/FB while VS2 has a 1.08 GB/FB. But those 11 more hits sure help play a role in a .338 BABIP rather than a .293 BABIP. An extra 11 hits would have VS2’s average at .253 and OBP at .340+.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:16 amI did, left out the "more" so thanks for the assist.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:11 amWell he’s at 7 right now, so unless you’re meaning 8-10 more, he’ll be in that range. He’s currently tied for 2nd in baseball in bunt hits. However, of the players in the top 10, he has the worst % of bunt hits in the group at 29.2%. His goal for that should be at least 50% next year and probably more like 70%. In the top 10, Lindor is 100%, Altuve is 87.5%, and Mullins is 70%. Those are the 3 highest percentages. Turang for Milwaukee is at 55.6%.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:04 amThank you, no way Church = VSII defensively.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:17 pmIf he plays at least as good of an OF as Scott then he must be the best CF in the game. Scott ranks 3rd in OAA among all MLB OFers behind PCA and Ceddanne Rafaela.clayton888 wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:14 pm I don’t understand why Church hasn’t been promoted and playing centerfield. He has torn up AAA/AA and plays at least as good an outfield as Scott and Scott, as the Fox announcers said last Friday, is the second worst offensive producer in MLB. It’s past time to move on there and give Church a six week look.
Scott’s biggest issue right now is power. His BB rate is nearly 10%, he has 31 SBs in 33 attempts, and he’s playing a stellar CF defense. If he could hit for any power (.307 SLG%), he’d be fine.
I highly doubt Church makes that catch VSII made last night.
And if he could just add bunting to his arsenal, maybe getting 8-10 bunt hits a year, he could steal 50 bases!
All he needs is a .330 OB% to be an asset.
And he absolutely needs some instruction on how to be a better bunter.
That should never be given NADO's snail-like 25.5 sprint speed vs VSII's blazing 30.2 and Winn's 28.4!
And hopefully scouty see's those numbers you did on Turang.
VSII can easily get that .330 OB% which could lead to 50 SB's!
Coupled w/his GG caliber defense in CF, he could become an asset from the #9 hole........possibly jetting to the lead-off spot!
Re: Nathan Church
No....I don’t remember the bet with Ozzie.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 10:31 amRemember the bet Whitey had w/Ozzie?Cusecards wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:31 amYes!rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 08:40 amThat and hitting down on the ball more often (picking his moments when to muscle up) to utilize his great speed.Charles King wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:25 pm Scott needs to work on bunting
If he could get a few bunt hits a week
It pains me every time he hits a lazy fly ball.
He should be wracking up IF hits which then turn into doubles!
I confess to having zero knowledge of Church other than his stats which are impressive.
Too bad he doesn’t hit RH.
Changes coming in the offseason. Nootbaar to me is redundant and a tease.
We are overloaded already with LH bats and more(JJ/Crooks) on the way.
If Arenado is still here(and that is becoming more and more likely) the arrival of JJ pushes Donovan to the OF. You also have Burleson who is a superior hitter to Noot.
And you also have Gorman who despite his frustrations I’d certainly keep over Noot.
Again... wish Church hit RH.![]()
Hopefully they have someone work w/him on both is bunting and hitting down on the ball more often this spring, keeping the ball on the ground more while pressuring infielders into rushed errors or infield hits!
Maybe we need the Lou Brown Treatment used with Willie Mays Hayes?
Re: Nathan Church
Remember the whining and angst for Koperniak?
Re: Nathan Church
Likewise, he played RF exclusively in college and mostly played there and LF until this year. Sticking at CF is probably his biggest hurdle.Wattage wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 07:50 am Churchs hitting this year- quite frankly- came out of absolutely nowhere.
He had a.724 ops and .705 ops at A+ and AA the last 2 years. To go from barely hitting at AA last year to hitting at the majors would be quite the jump.
Id be fine with calling him up since he has to be added to 40 in the offseason anyways, but would be fine ifnthey didnt too if they are happy with his progression this year and dont want to overwhelm him by bringing him to majors. Weve rushed too many players like walker and scott last year.
Besides- this year was supposed to be about giving guys like scott runway. Im not concerned with trying to desperately squeeze out a 3rd wildcard for a 1st round exit.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 465
- Joined: 24 May 2024 20:16 pm
Re: Nathan Church
Maybe, maybe not. It most likely depends on if Church breaks back off the bat like Scott did. Great catch, no doubt, but a much easier catch if he would have gotten the right read.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:04 amThank you, no way Church = VSII defensively.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:17 pmIf he plays at least as good of an OF as Scott then he must be the best CF in the game. Scott ranks 3rd in OAA among all MLB OFers behind PCA and Ceddanne Rafaela.clayton888 wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:14 pm I don’t understand why Church hasn’t been promoted and playing centerfield. He has torn up AAA/AA and plays at least as good an outfield as Scott and Scott, as the Fox announcers said last Friday, is the second worst offensive producer in MLB. It’s past time to move on there and give Church a six week look.
Scott’s biggest issue right now is power. His BB rate is nearly 10%, he has 31 SBs in 33 attempts, and he’s playing a stellar CF defense. If he could hit for any power (.307 SLG%), he’d be fine.
I highly doubt Church makes that catch VSII made last night.
And if he could just add bunting to his arsenal, maybe getting 8-10 bunt hits a year, he could steal 50 bases!
All he needs is a .330 OB% to be an asset.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 11602
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Nathan Church
$1 for Whitey each ball Ozzie hit in the air............$1 for Ozzie for each ball he kept on the ground or was a hit.Cusecards wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 11:30 amNo....I don’t remember the bet with Ozzie.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 10:31 amRemember the bet Whitey had w/Ozzie?Cusecards wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:31 amYes!rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 08:40 amThat and hitting down on the ball more often (picking his moments when to muscle up) to utilize his great speed.Charles King wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:25 pm Scott needs to work on bunting
If he could get a few bunt hits a week
It pains me every time he hits a lazy fly ball.
He should be wracking up IF hits which then turn into doubles!
I confess to having zero knowledge of Church other than his stats which are impressive.
Too bad he doesn’t hit RH.
Changes coming in the offseason. Nootbaar to me is redundant and a tease.
We are overloaded already with LH bats and more(JJ/Crooks) on the way.
If Arenado is still here(and that is becoming more and more likely) the arrival of JJ pushes Donovan to the OF. You also have Burleson who is a superior hitter to Noot.
And you also have Gorman who despite his frustrations I’d certainly keep over Noot.
Again... wish Church hit RH.![]()
Hopefully they have someone work w/him on both is bunting and hitting down on the ball more often this spring, keeping the ball on the ground more while pressuring infielders into rushed errors or infield hits!
Maybe we need the Lou Brown Treatment used with Willie Mays Hayes?
Ozzie always said he "cleaned up"!

-
- Forum User
- Posts: 11602
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Nathan Church
I was at the game, didn't see the any replay so I'll take your word for it huck', thx.imyourhuckleberry wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 11:44 amMaybe, maybe not. It most likely depends on if Church breaks back off the bat like Scott did. Great catch, no doubt, but a much easier catch if he would have gotten the right read.rockondlouie wrote: ↑13 Aug 2025 09:04 amThank you, no way Church = VSII defensively.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:17 pmIf he plays at least as good of an OF as Scott then he must be the best CF in the game. Scott ranks 3rd in OAA among all MLB OFers behind PCA and Ceddanne Rafaela.clayton888 wrote: ↑12 Aug 2025 16:14 pm I don’t understand why Church hasn’t been promoted and playing centerfield. He has torn up AAA/AA and plays at least as good an outfield as Scott and Scott, as the Fox announcers said last Friday, is the second worst offensive producer in MLB. It’s past time to move on there and give Church a six week look.
Scott’s biggest issue right now is power. His BB rate is nearly 10%, he has 31 SBs in 33 attempts, and he’s playing a stellar CF defense. If he could hit for any power (.307 SLG%), he’d be fine.
I highly doubt Church makes that catch VSII made last night.
And if he could just add bunting to his arsenal, maybe getting 8-10 bunt hits a year, he could steal 50 bases!
All he needs is a .330 OB% to be an asset.