Please stop cluttering the board with the same stupid threads related to nothing. Thank you in advance.Shady wrote: ↑10 Aug 2025 10:07 amThis reveals how clueless you are regarding hitting ability.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑09 Aug 2025 21:34 pmJust replace Burleson with Walker you useless garden gnome. Presto. They asked for most upside, that ain't your boy Burly. He has peaked, just getting fatter and slower. Wear it.Shady wrote: ↑09 Aug 2025 21:06 pmYou are a gutless weasel. What's your lineup?
Play The Best Upside Lineup
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4026
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:24 pm
Re: Play The Best Upside Lineup
Re: Play The Best Upside Lineup
oblivious
Shady
Shady
Shady
Overview
Shady
Similar and opposite words
Shady
Usage examples
Shady
Pronunciation
Shady
Dictionary
Shady
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
Shady
adjective
Shady
not aware of or not concerned about what is happening around one.
Shady
Shady
Shady
Overview
Shady
Similar and opposite words
Shady
Usage examples
Shady
Pronunciation
Shady
Dictionary
Shady
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
Shady
adjective
Shady
not aware of or not concerned about what is happening around one.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 75
- Joined: 27 Dec 2023 14:30 pm
Re: Play The Best Upside Lineup
Herrera hasn’t played catcher in 3+ monthsBasil Shabazz wrote: ↑09 Aug 2025 14:56 pm OF Donny, VS2, Walker
IF Gorman, Winn, JJW, Contreras
C Crooks/Herrera
DH Burly/Herrera
Role them out day in and day out. Sink or swim.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1249
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Play The Best Upside Lineup
Good to know you have been following along.ecleme22 wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 07:12 amHerrera hasn’t played catcher in 3+ monthsBasil Shabazz wrote: ↑09 Aug 2025 14:56 pm OF Donny, VS2, Walker
IF Gorman, Winn, JJW, Contreras
C Crooks/Herrera
DH Burly/Herrera
Role them out day in and day out. Sink or swim.
Re: Play The Best Upside Lineup
So the question the OP was getting at I think was, what is the best lineup right now to try and win as many games as possibly as long as the Cards have a shot for the PO's this year, regardless of the odds being on the long side.ClassicO wrote: ↑10 Aug 2025 17:08 pm Why do so many seem compelled to argue that VSII needs more time to improve his woeful hitting, ignoring the facts?
Just compare his time in AAA to that of Nathan Church, who has almost the same range in CF as Scott and a far superior arm (24 assists in minors vs Scott's 11). Then consider their college careers to see if they were ever elite hitters. It seems obvious:
Scott
AAA - .210 .294 .303 .597 in 362 PAs. Range Factor vs League 2.72 2.62
College - .254/.368/.419/.787
Church
AAA - .332/.396/.500/.896 in 213 PAs. Range Factor vs League 2.70 2.53
College - .341/.405/.515/.920
Church throwing out runner in ST: https://www.mlb.com/cardinals/video/nat ... los-santos
Imo, right now, VS2 is the CF guy for that.
Now next year, yes, to start the year I'd give VS2 some runway to show if once again he improved in the off season to keep his job, but if Church or Baez would challenge him for that spot, that'd be very sweet to see. Would love to see either one of them come in and earn the CF position. To me, it's all about improving the overall team, not the name on the back of a shirt.
For VS2, if he could just improve his OB% to at least the .320 range, he won't be that easy to beat out. His 30.6'/sec. sprint to catch that ball in late innings last night he might have made look relatively easy, but not many can close like that. Glad he was the guy out there, as that was a key play in the W.
Big fan of Baez btw, and am impressed with how Church has been playing. Quality OF depth would be ............... rare, but great to have.
Re: Play The Best Upside Lineup
I didn't say bring him up now. I started a thread about Sept Call-Ups, and I said Church or Baez should be one - simply so we can see how they fare vs MLB pitching before next year (even ST pitching isn't a great test). We have a very good idea what we have - and don't have - with VSII. VSII would really have to find something to increase his OBP from .283 to .320 - so what's the problem with looking at some others (who are also very good defensively). And note: Church has a Fangraphs' Speed of 6.8 vs. JJW's 5.6, so he's not slow.JDW wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 13:21 pmSo the question the OP was getting at I think was, what is the best lineup right now to try and win as many games as possibly as long as the Cards have a shot for the PO's this year, regardless of the odds being on the long side.ClassicO wrote: ↑10 Aug 2025 17:08 pm Why do so many seem compelled to argue that VSII needs more time to improve his woeful hitting, ignoring the facts?
Just compare his time in AAA to that of Nathan Church, who has almost the same range in CF as Scott and a far superior arm (24 assists in minors vs Scott's 11). Then consider their college careers to see if they were ever elite hitters. It seems obvious:
Scott
AAA - .210 .294 .303 .597 in 362 PAs. Range Factor vs League 2.72 2.62
College - .254/.368/.419/.787
Church
AAA - .332/.396/.500/.896 in 213 PAs. Range Factor vs League 2.70 2.53
College - .341/.405/.515/.920
Church throwing out runner in ST: https://www.mlb.com/cardinals/video/nat ... los-santos
Imo, right now, VS2 is the CF guy for that.
Now next year, yes, to start the year I'd give VS2 some runway to show if once again he improved in the off season to keep his job, but if Church or Baez would challenge him for that spot, that'd be very sweet to see. Would love to see either one of them come in and earn the CF position. To me, it's all about improving the overall team, not the name on the back of a shirt.
For VS2, if he could just improve his OB% to at least the .320 range, he won't be that easy to beat out. His 30.6'/sec. sprint to catch that ball in late innings last night he might have made look relatively easy, but not many can close like that. Glad he was the guy out there, as that was a key play in the W.
Big fan of Baez btw, and am impressed with how Church has been playing. Quality OF depth would be ............... rare, but great to have.