They should have got more for Maton

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

ClassicO
Forum User
Posts: 1251
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:37 pm

Re: They should have got more for Maton

Post by ClassicO »

This is the trade I have the hardest time with the return.
RamFan08NY
Forum User
Posts: 898
Joined: 24 May 2024 12:48 pm

Re: They should have got more for Maton

Post by RamFan08NY »

hmoss859 wrote: 31 Jul 2025 21:45 pm Reading between lines on reporting, sounds like they tried to milk a better offer from other teams, and it all fell thru, thus the last minute desperation trade with Rangers

Very disappointing poker play by Mo

Maton will help Rangers
Let's see. The GM tried to get as much as he could, and all interested teams said no. So, he took the highest offer on the table.

Where in that is disappointing poker playing? Have you ever sold anything? Did you have any luck forcing a buyer in to over paying?
DRoss
Forum User
Posts: 125
Joined: 22 Aug 2020 19:44 pm

Re: They should have got more for Maton

Post by DRoss »

Cranny wrote: 01 Aug 2025 07:39 am
DRoss wrote: 01 Aug 2025 07:21 am
hmoss859 wrote: 31 Jul 2025 21:45 pm Reading between lines on reporting, sounds like they tried to milk a better offer from other teams, and it all fell thru, thus the last minute desperation trade with Rangers

Very disappointing poker play by Mo

Maton will help Rangers
This post makes no sense. You can't force other teams to give you what you think is fair value.

You don't know how other teams valued Maton.

The Cardinals got what they can get.
In his first year of pro ball this season Mason Molina has given up 55 hits in 74 innings and struck out 93 across 2 levels. 7th round pick out of U. of Arkansas.

Skyler Hales has made it all the way to AAA this season, his second season as a pro. 4th round draft pick out of Santa Clara.

Pretty good haul for a 2+ month rental.
We shall see.

In my eyes, since Maton was a productive player for the Cards, the only way it can be a good haul is if one, or even better, both guys become productive MLB players.
Cranny
Forum User
Posts: 5121
Joined: 24 May 2024 09:26 am

Re: They should have got more for Maton

Post by Cranny »

DRoss wrote: 01 Aug 2025 17:38 pm
Cranny wrote: 01 Aug 2025 07:39 am
DRoss wrote: 01 Aug 2025 07:21 am
hmoss859 wrote: 31 Jul 2025 21:45 pm Reading between lines on reporting, sounds like they tried to milk a better offer from other teams, and it all fell thru, thus the last minute desperation trade with Rangers

Very disappointing poker play by Mo

Maton will help Rangers
This post makes no sense. You can't force other teams to give you what you think is fair value.

You don't know how other teams valued Maton.

The Cardinals got what they can get.
In his first year of pro ball this season Mason Molina has given up 55 hits in 74 innings and struck out 93 across 2 levels. 7th round pick out of U. of Arkansas.

Skyler Hales has made it all the way to AAA this season, his second season as a pro. 4th round draft pick out of Santa Clara.

Pretty good haul for a 2+ month rental.
We shall see.

In my eyes, since Maton was a productive player for the Cards, the only way it can be a good haul is if one, or even better, both guys become productive MLB players.
Would you have rather kept him for 60 days, and not gotten anything for him?
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 5479
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: They should have got more for Maton

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

RamFan08NY wrote: 01 Aug 2025 16:23 pm
hmoss859 wrote: 31 Jul 2025 21:45 pm Reading between lines on reporting, sounds like they tried to milk a better offer from other teams, and it all fell thru, thus the last minute desperation trade with Rangers

Very disappointing poker play by Mo

Maton will help Rangers
Let's see. The GM tried to get as much as he could, and all interested teams said no. So, he took the highest offer on the table.

Where in that is disappointing poker playing? Have you ever sold anything? Did you have any luck forcing a buyer in to over paying?
That’s true unless Mo was asking for sky high prices and teams balked and pivoted to other teams players so he ended up having to take what he could get from the teams that were left
DRoss
Forum User
Posts: 125
Joined: 22 Aug 2020 19:44 pm

Re: They should have got more for Maton

Post by DRoss »

Cranny wrote: 01 Aug 2025 18:09 pm
Would you have rather kept him for 60 days, and not gotten anything for him?
[/quote]

No.

But if you don't ultimately receive productive MLB player(s) for the productive player you gave up then how can you consider it a haul for the major league team?
AnExParrot
Forum User
Posts: 1130
Joined: 02 Jan 2020 19:58 pm

Re: They should have got more for Maton

Post by AnExParrot »

hmoss859 wrote: 31 Jul 2025 21:45 pm Reading between lines on reporting, sounds like they tried to milk a better offer from other teams, and it all fell thru, thus the last minute desperation trade with Rangers

Very disappointing poker play by Mo

Maton will help Rangers
Which reporting brought you to this conclusion?
Post Reply