Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

pitchingandefense
Forum User
Posts: 132
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 11:58 am

Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Post by pitchingandefense »

BTV tweet on the Matz trade:

“Today the #RedSox reportedly acquired LHP Steven Matz (-$1.2M surplus trade value) from the #STLCards in exchange for 1B Blaze Jordan ($1.8M).

The deal is accepted by our model as a minor overpay by Boston.”

BTV tweet on the Helsley trade:

“Today the #Mets reportedly acquired RHP Ryan Helsley ($4.7M surplus trade value) from the #STLCards in exchange for IF Jesus Baez ($8.2M) and RHPs Nate Dohm ($1.8M) and Frank Elissalt (not in system) ($10.0M total).

The deal is accepted by our model as a moderate overpay by NYM.”

So their model likes both trades for the Cards, FWIW. The Cards needed depth up and down their system, and these two trades helped that. Hopefully more to come today.
ClassicO
Forum User
Posts: 1251
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:37 pm

Re: Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Post by ClassicO »

pitchingandefense wrote: 31 Jul 2025 07:14 am BTV tweet on the Matz trade:

“Today the #RedSox reportedly acquired LHP Steven Matz (-$1.2M surplus trade value) from the #STLCards in exchange for 1B Blaze Jordan ($1.8M).

The deal is accepted by our model as a minor overpay by Boston.”

BTV tweet on the Helsley trade:

“Today the #Mets reportedly acquired RHP Ryan Helsley ($4.7M surplus trade value) from the #STLCards in exchange for IF Jesus Baez ($8.2M) and RHPs Nate Dohm ($1.8M) and Frank Elissalt (not in system) ($10.0M total).

The deal is accepted by our model as a moderate overpay by NYM.”

So their model likes both trades for the Cards, FWIW. The Cards needed depth up and down their system, and these two trades helped that. Hopefully more to come today.
Many object to the BTVs, but it seems more accurate than Law or other pundits when considering their history.
MrPostman01
Forum User
Posts: 539
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:55 pm

Re: Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Post by MrPostman01 »

Our posters went goo goo gaga over the Ozuna trade not valuing what was shipped out from the farm. 8O 8O
pitchingandefense
Forum User
Posts: 132
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 11:58 am

Re: Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Post by pitchingandefense »

BTV tweet on the Maton trade:

“Today the #Rangers reportedly acquired RHP Phil Maton ($2.0M surplus trade value) from the #STLCards in exchange for RHP Skylar Hales ($1.6M), LHP Mason Molina (not yet in system) and international bonus pool money.

The deal is tentatively accepted by our model, pending Molina”

So in total the BTV model has the Cardinals ending up with about $8M in surplus value at the end of the deadline. They have gained 6 prospects, who will join with the 2025 draftees to help replenish the thin minor league ranks. It was a good business deadline that hopefully helps continue to shape the future under Bloom.
jbrach
Forum User
Posts: 598
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:33 pm

Re: Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Post by jbrach »

total and complete nonsense,nobody knows good or bad and wont for years
pitchingandefense
Forum User
Posts: 132
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 11:58 am

Re: Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Post by pitchingandefense »

jbrach wrote: 31 Jul 2025 20:42 pm total and complete nonsense,nobody knows good or bad and wont for years
Definitely some nonsense to it, but their model has been pretty accurate in assessing trades as far as attaching monetary value to each name. At the end of the day, a .500 team turned three relievers with expiring contracts into 6 minor league prospects.
Braund241
Forum User
Posts: 703
Joined: 24 May 2024 17:52 pm

Re: Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Post by Braund241 »

pitchingandefense wrote: 31 Jul 2025 21:02 pm
jbrach wrote: 31 Jul 2025 20:42 pm total and complete nonsense,nobody knows good or bad and wont for years
Definitely some nonsense to it, but their model has been pretty accurate in assessing trades as far as attaching monetary value to each name. At the end of the day, a .500 team turned three relievers with expiring contracts into 6 minor league prospects.
A .500 team who will continue to be a .500 team. You go Mo!
An Old Friend
Forum User
Posts: 13104
Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm

Re: Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Post by An Old Friend »

jbrach wrote: 31 Jul 2025 20:42 pm total and complete nonsense,nobody knows good or bad and wont for years
Then why are you even here debating the merits of anything?
hugeCardfan
Forum User
Posts: 1669
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:42 pm

Re: Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Post by hugeCardfan »

At least there is numerical application to the analysis. You have to question the valuation of the loaners we traded; which totally depends on how they perform the next couple months and in the postseason. They could be much more valuable to the acquiring team than the surplus trade value assigned. That actually matters little to the Cardinals. We had no place to go or future plans for the departing "soldiers".

I am not disappointed with our augment to the farm and I though I would be..... So there is that. :mrgreen:
Alex Reyes Cy Young
Forum User
Posts: 3187
Joined: 25 May 2024 06:20 am

Re: Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Post by Alex Reyes Cy Young »

pitchingandefense wrote: 31 Jul 2025 21:02 pm
jbrach wrote: 31 Jul 2025 20:42 pm total and complete nonsense,nobody knows good or bad and wont for years
Definitely some nonsense to it, but their model has been pretty accurate in assessing trades as far as attaching monetary value to each name. At the end of the day, a .500 team turned three relievers with expiring contracts into 6 minor league prospects.
Well put.
cardstatman
Forum User
Posts: 2410
Joined: 23 May 2024 22:10 pm

Re: Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Post by cardstatman »

BTV likes the trades for the Cardinals.

2.0 Out: Maton 2.0
1.6+ In: Hales 1.6 + Molina ??? + 250K intl signing bonus allowance

-1.2 Out: Matz -1.2
1.8 In: Jordan 1.8

4.7 Out: Helsley 4.7
10.0+ In: Baez 8.2 + Dohm 1.8 + Elissalt ???
pitchingandefense
Forum User
Posts: 132
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 11:58 am

Re: Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Post by pitchingandefense »

hugeCardfan wrote: 31 Jul 2025 22:12 pm At least there is numerical application to the analysis. You have to question the valuation of the loaners we traded; which totally depends on how they perform the next couple months and in the postseason. They could be much more valuable to the acquiring team than the surplus trade value assigned. That actually matters little to the Cardinals. We had no place to go or future plans for the departing "soldiers".

I am not disappointed with our augment to the farm and I though I would be..... So there is that. :mrgreen:
They have definitely augmented the farm this year. 21 draftees, 17 international signings (spotrac info), and now 6 prospects traded for has added 44 players to the system.
Cranny
Forum User
Posts: 5121
Joined: 24 May 2024 09:26 am

Re: Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Post by Cranny »

MrPostman01 wrote: 31 Jul 2025 07:31 am Our posters went goo goo gaga over the Ozuna trade not valuing what was shipped out from the farm. 8O 8O
Ozuna had 37 home runs and 124 RBI for the Marlins in 2017. He slashed .312/.376/.548/.924. That’s what the Cardinals traded for. Alcantara had a 4.31 ERA in 22 starts at Springfield that season. Gallen had a 3.79 ERA at Springfield and in 4 starts at Memphis had a 3.48 ERA. The Cardinals badly needed a MOTO bat. Most on CT thought it was a great trade.
Cranny
Forum User
Posts: 5121
Joined: 24 May 2024 09:26 am

Re: Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Post by Cranny »

Braund241 wrote: 31 Jul 2025 21:09 pm
pitchingandefense wrote: 31 Jul 2025 21:02 pm
jbrach wrote: 31 Jul 2025 20:42 pm total and complete nonsense,nobody knows good or bad and wont for years
Definitely some nonsense to it, but their model has been pretty accurate in assessing trades as far as attaching monetary value to each name. At the end of the day, a .500 team turned three relievers with expiring contracts into 6 minor league prospects.
A .500 team who will continue to be a .500 team. You go Mo!
That’s the spirit, Braund.
Midrange Jay
Forum User
Posts: 110
Joined: 10 Jun 2024 01:56 am

Re: Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Post by Midrange Jay »

jbrach wrote: 31 Jul 2025 20:42 pm total and complete nonsense,nobody knows good or bad and wont for years
As long as people click for the “assessment.” All about engagement.
HorseTrader
Forum User
Posts: 2258
Joined: 18 Apr 2020 13:40 pm

Re: Baseball Trade Value Trade Assessments

Post by HorseTrader »

If you look at immediate value we lost, if you consider future, we won on all three.
Post Reply