John Mozeliak

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

skeezix
Forum User
Posts: 272
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:29 pm

Re: John Mozeliak

Post by skeezix »

So, when milk curdles because it's past the expiration date, we should continue drinking it? Call 911, because you're on your way to the ER.

That's Mo's recent job performance review.
Cranny
Forum User
Posts: 5127
Joined: 24 May 2024 09:26 am

Re: John Mozeliak

Post by Cranny »

What causes any poster to say that Mo has a “punchable face”? That’s pure personal opinion, and symbolic of personal attack.
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 11737
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: John Mozeliak

Post by rockondlouie »

It's a combination a "Mo fatigue" couple w/his SMUG ATTITUDE that turns people off.

BDWJr is the one who caused all this as I started to point out years ago when I started multiple threads stating:

"BILL DEWITT, Jr is the REAL PROBLEM"

Bill knew good & well that Mo's approach had become stale and that he needed to overhaul the entire front office.

Yet he failed to act, content to draw that 3+M as the $$$$$$$$$$$ kept rolling in.

Had he fired Mo years ago and brought in fresh blood like he has now in C. Bloom, then Mo might have escaped the dislike most cardinals fans have for him.

So blame Mo for the smugness, but blame Dewitt for failing to act sooner.

JMO
Rocket Scientist
Forum User
Posts: 239
Joined: 27 May 2024 20:24 pm

Re: John Mozeliak

Post by Rocket Scientist »

He wears a bow tie and sweaters tied around his neck this screams dumb[ash]. He's done nothing on the field to disprove his look. Trading 2 cy young candidates for nothing, dress like this.
BrummerStealsHome
Forum User
Posts: 2361
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:12 pm

Re: John Mozeliak

Post by BrummerStealsHome »

Cranny wrote: 25 Jul 2025 09:46 am Let me ask posters a question. Mo came to the Cardinals with Walt in 1995. He’s been with the Cardinals in various capacities up and down the organization for 30 years. During that time, the Cardinals have had four losing seasons. Four. And they have been in the World Series 3 times, winning 2 World Championships. He’s been honored by being named MLB Executive of the Year multiple times.

I’ll fully admit that the Cardinals have been disappointing over the past decade, with an abysmal
playoff record (when they even made the playoffs). Very disappointing to fans, including this one.

Criticize the downslide and various moves that didn’t work out, sure. But why all the vicious personal attacks? Cruel and nasty nicknames, making fun of the way he dresses, etc. One poster even wanted to assault him and smash him in the face. Another talked about bird feces on him.

Express disappointment and display frustration, sure, but why all the other nasty personal stuff? Maybe we should recognize both the good and the bad over 30 years.
New to the internets, Cranny? It's ain't called anti-social media for nothing.
OldRed
Forum User
Posts: 2451
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:53 pm

Re: John Mozeliak

Post by OldRed »

Cranny wrote: 25 Jul 2025 10:40 am What causes any poster to say that Mo has a “punchable face”? That’s pure personal opinion, and symbolic of personal attack.
You ask for individual opinions and then challenge their personal opinions.
dugoutrex
Forum User
Posts: 378
Joined: 24 Jun 2025 13:18 pm

Re: John Mozeliak

Post by dugoutrex »

won't be long before we start criticizing Bloom

first nickname ... algae bloom ?
Adam2
Forum User
Posts: 658
Joined: 26 Jun 2024 11:40 am

Re: John Mozeliak

Post by Adam2 »

Question for Cranny specifically:

This is not me being a wise-A@@, honest question.

why do you expend so much time and energy focused on always defending ownership and the front office? i know you said in this thread you understood Mo has not been great generally the last decade, but any thread at all that brings up criticism of the front office you always have to jump in and defend

I'm not saying you are correct or incorrect in your responses, i am just genuinely curious
Banner29
Forum User
Posts: 3778
Joined: 28 Apr 2018 12:49 pm

Re: John Mozeliak

Post by Banner29 »

dugoutrex wrote: 25 Jul 2025 11:15 am won't be long before we start criticizing Bloom

first nickname ... algae bloom ?
What’s funny is the first offenders will be the ones fighting so hard in Mos honor
sdaltons
Forum User
Posts: 3252
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:45 pm

Re: John Mozeliak

Post by sdaltons »

It's really very simple.

When Mo started, this organization was run by a top baseball man who understood it takes a village of top baseball men to build a successful organization. They had top baseball men at all levels whom they trusted to all work towards the same goal in supporting the organization. This era produced many of the impressive results to which you refer.

As those top baseball men aged out and retired, Mo, fairly young compared to the others, rose in power. He eventually was given the top job and it gradually became evident he did not approach building the organization in the same way.

He continued to phase out the remaining top baseball men - it seemed he wanted to show it could be done without a village. I don't know that it was arrogance, but he certainly approached fans with arrogance. It all gives the appearance of someone who wants everyone to know he is smarter than them.

But in any case, the results began to suffer, calling into question whether he qualified as a top baseball man and he responded by doubling down. He promoted experienced coaches to the majors and then pushed them out when results didn't improve. He only hired people with no experience. He has now admitted they took focus off player development, which is baffling for an organization that has the stated goal of building from within. They knew they couldn't compete with the big spenders but they didn't focus on developing.

Ultimately he's leaving the organization in a worse state than how it was when he became the boss. That has to be part of his legacy.
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 11737
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: John Mozeliak

Post by rockondlouie »

dugoutrex wrote: 25 Jul 2025 11:15 am won't be long before we start criticizing Bloom

first nickname ... algae bloom ?
First bad trade and we'll start reading, "Blooming Idiot". :wink:
82birds
Forum User
Posts: 15169
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:17 pm

Re: John Mozeliak

Post by 82birds »

Ordinary Man wrote: 25 Jul 2025 10:02 am Ok, I'll bite.

He's been employed WAY past his expiration date. He's done hardly anything of note for the last many years. The Arenado and Goldschmidt deals were like gimme putts. If any real effort was needed to get what the team needed for postseason success, he usually punted. Dry powder, low hanging fruit and arbitrage. Yeah, that's a word he actually used. And a guy returning from the IL was 'just like making a trade'.

The money our disinterested owner provided for salaries, Moe pretty much wasted on stupid contracts and extensions, too many to mention here. The coaching and minor league system went to hell. Remember the women's softball coach who was hired as the assistant hitting coach? Does that sound like something a proud major league team would do?

He's been the face of the team for many years and has a smug, I know everything attitude about him. He and the owners thought the fans were suckers that would show up for anything. I'll admit, it took a while for most the of the fans to figure out they were being scammed. But look at the attendance now!

I don't get into the personal attacks myself, (in fact I hardly ever post) but I can understand when frustrated fans do. This team went from being a standard bearer of the National League to being just another team to beat up on. On his watch. I won't miss him.
^that is excellent Ordinary Man !
rightthinker4
Forum User
Posts: 174
Joined: 27 May 2024 23:12 pm

Re: John Mozeliak

Post by rightthinker4 »

Adam2 wrote: 25 Jul 2025 09:51 am I'll be honest here. I used to generally like him and i think his overall career has been very good.

For me he just rubs me the wrong way, the smugness. I know that shouldn't bother me but it always has.

To be fair to him i was at a game last year and he was walking down the concourse. Many people saw him. A boy probably 7 years old or so ran up to him and asked for an autograph. He squatted down, signed the hat and seemed genuinely happy to talk to the boy and his dad.

So he's probably a good guy i just think he could have done a little better over the last few years with his public relations and public image
I think you’re accurate. To me, MO has always come off as the smartest guy in the room. He has a very condescending attitude. He would be better off not doing interviews. As you pointed out, he’s probably a nice guy.
desertrat23
Forum User
Posts: 1452
Joined: 28 May 2024 18:12 pm

Re: John Mozeliak

Post by desertrat23 »

rightthinker4 wrote: 25 Jul 2025 12:26 pm
Adam2 wrote: 25 Jul 2025 09:51 am I'll be honest here. I used to generally like him and i think his overall career has been very good.

For me he just rubs me the wrong way, the smugness. I know that shouldn't bother me but it always has.

To be fair to him i was at a game last year and he was walking down the concourse. Many people saw him. A boy probably 7 years old or so ran up to him and asked for an autograph. He squatted down, signed the hat and seemed genuinely happy to talk to the boy and his dad.

So he's probably a good guy i just think he could have done a little better over the last few years with his public relations and public image
I think you’re accurate. To me, MO has always come off as the smartest guy in the room. He has a very condescending attitude. He would be better off not doing interviews. As you pointed out, he’s probably a nice guy.
This is it. He did a radio interview a couple of years ago and when asked about the team's sliding performance, his response was "have you not been entertained?" So (bleep) arrogant. It's all well and good to be proud of his successes, but coasting on it and then looking down his nose at the customers is not the way to go about it.

As for criticizing how he dresses, that's just Missouri Hoosier dislike of what they perceive to be "coastal elites."
OldRed
Forum User
Posts: 2451
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:53 pm

Re: John Mozeliak

Post by OldRed »

Cranny:

You lost your battle today and attendance proves it.
Hoosier59
Forum User
Posts: 915
Joined: 16 Dec 2022 12:03 pm

Re: John Mozeliak

Post by Hoosier59 »

I’ve spoken to Mo personally and he did come across smug and condescending! I asked him a legitimate question about the line up and how he saw it shaping up, and he kinda made fun of the question and ended by asking me “ what would I do “. So, I told him and he responded by telling how they don’t really value batting averages and a bunch of blah blah blah! However, that opening day, they started the exact line up I quoted him and in the same order.
Post Reply