Cards' Trade Deadline plans 'fluid' as they continue crucial stretch

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

imyourhuckleberry
Forum User
Posts: 470
Joined: 24 May 2024 20:16 pm

Re: Cards' Trade Deadline plans 'fluid' as they continue crucial stretch

Post by imyourhuckleberry »

I've said it before and I'll say it again...

I find it hard to believe Bloom would have agreed to a 5-year (?) contract which included Mo's "retirement year" without having final sign-off on any roster decisions which affected next season and beyond. He had too much leverage (ability to just pass on the job).

If he did not demand that, we are in big trouble because what kind of leader give up that control over a job he will become responsible for?
imadangman
Forum User
Posts: 2976
Joined: 14 Dec 2022 09:21 am

Re: Cards' Trade Deadline plans 'fluid' as they continue crucial stretch

Post by imadangman »

Maybe John Mozeliak will be gender fluid until Bloom gets authority after the season. Until then Bloom cannot handle deadline decisions.
riff raff
Forum User
Posts: 3585
Joined: 23 Oct 2020 15:44 pm

Re: Cards' Trade Deadline plans 'fluid' as they continue crucial stretch

Post by riff raff »

imyourhuckleberry wrote: 22 Jul 2025 12:35 pm I've said it before and I'll say it again...

I find it hard to believe Bloom would have agreed to a 5-year (?) contract which included Mo's "retirement year" without having final sign-off on any roster decisions which affected next season and beyond. He had too much leverage (ability to just pass on the job).

If he did not demand that, we are in big trouble because what kind of leader give up that control over a job he will become responsible for?
100% agree but the stupidity shall continue. This thread is a prime example.
Alex Reyes Cy Young
Forum User
Posts: 3265
Joined: 25 May 2024 06:20 am

Re: Cards' Trade Deadline plans 'fluid' as they continue crucial stretch

Post by Alex Reyes Cy Young »

riff raff wrote: 22 Jul 2025 12:43 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 22 Jul 2025 12:35 pm I've said it before and I'll say it again...

I find it hard to believe Bloom would have agreed to a 5-year (?) contract which included Mo's "retirement year" without having final sign-off on any roster decisions which affected next season and beyond. He had too much leverage (ability to just pass on the job).

If he did not demand that, we are in big trouble because what kind of leader give up that control over a job he will become responsible for?
100% agree but the stupidity shall continue. This thread is a prime example.
Moe is in charge this season.
riff raff
Forum User
Posts: 3585
Joined: 23 Oct 2020 15:44 pm

Re: Cards' Trade Deadline plans 'fluid' as they continue crucial stretch

Post by riff raff »

Alex Reyes Cy Young wrote: 22 Jul 2025 12:55 pm
riff raff wrote: 22 Jul 2025 12:43 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 22 Jul 2025 12:35 pm I've said it before and I'll say it again...

I find it hard to believe Bloom would have agreed to a 5-year (?) contract which included Mo's "retirement year" without having final sign-off on any roster decisions which affected next season and beyond. He had too much leverage (ability to just pass on the job).

If he did not demand that, we are in big trouble because what kind of leader give up that control over a job he will become responsible for?
100% agree but the stupidity shall continue. This thread is a prime example.
Moe is in charge this season.
and continues...
Post Reply