a smell of green grass wrote: ↑21 Jul 2025 11:05 am
STL fan in MN wrote: ↑21 Jul 2025 11:00 am
a smell of green grass wrote: ↑21 Jul 2025 10:47 am
seattleblue wrote: ↑21 Jul 2025 10:38 am
My biggest concern before the season is finishing the spreadsheet that has the grid of what day/time all the teams of all the prospects play, it's a manual grind. I'm halfway through Sarnia.
To the OP on his last comment: the reason people resent that is life provides plenty of reasons for everyone to be concerned, worried, anxious, so for you to create a whole persona out of pouring it on even more is really atrocious behavior and the reason people find it despicable is obvious.
The Blues prospects are ranked in the middle of the pack by every source that provides a ranking. What I'm telling people is no different. Do I put it in front of noses too often? Perhaps, but the sources that blow fake sunshine are also very active, and they irritate me.
Here’s a source that has them 9th:
https://forums.hfboards.com/threads/hf ... .3009801/
HF is doing a series of polls ranking prospect pools. And it’s a conglomerate of the entire HF community, not just 1 guy, so that holds a little more weight for me.
You are encouraged and happy to see that a team that just completed a RE-WHATEVER is ranked 9th?
Let me remind you. A RE-WHATEVER project is started when the franchise needs an extreme makeover. The cupboard is not bare possibly, but there is no chance of a Stanley Cup ever being found in there.
ASOGG MATH:
Bare Cupboard + AVERAGE New Talent = Average Results at best
What you’re describing, what you clearly want or at least wanted the Blues to do was a complete rebuild. A complete tear down to the studs rebuild like the Hawks and Sharks did. The reason why Army says “re-whatever” is because it was something much much lighter than that. Call it a retool, reconfigure, reset, recalibration, restructure, rebalance…whatever re- you want to use, it was very clearly not a full rebuild.
THAT is the crux of where you differ from the thinking of Army and Stillman. Stillman, and by extension Army, was not willing to do that. Nor was it really even all that feasible as they were “too good” with guys like Thomas, Kyrou and Binnington on the roster. They would’ve had to sell them all off to fully rip it to the studs to be bad enough to get the picks teams like Chicago and SJ got.
The Blues didn’t do that. The Blues won’t be doing that. Maybe you’ll eventually be proven right that they showed done that. But it won’t be for about 10 years before you’ll really even have that opportunity. So yeah, you making basically the same point in 5 different threads every day is beyond tiresome. We get what you’re saying. You don’t need to keep “putting it under our noses.” We either just disagree, have grown tired of the same old discussion or have accepted that we’ll just have to wait the 10ish years to see how it turns out.