Exactly. The only thing Helsley was proving was if he was as good as 2024. As you say, he's established as a legitimate closer. I think Mo was hedging on 2025 still.Clubmaker2 wrote: ↑20 Jul 2025 11:34 amHelsley didnt need to prove anything. Who invents this baloney. He was well established with incredible 2024 (league leader franchise record) and 2022 (0.742 whip) years. 2023 about half season total with injury, stats ok still with 1.06 whip in 2023. Absolutely nothing left for Helsley to prove. There is a story about Mo saying he wasnt going to trade RH, seems hard to know Mo true intent with RH .Red7 wrote: ↑20 Jul 2025 08:07 amFor the umpteenth time…it wasn’t about being honest or not when it came to Fedde and Helsley. It was about maximizing their value. Neither had the track record that would bring maximum value. Both needed to prove that 2024 was not a fluke. If we were worried about regression, don’t you think other teams would be? Look at the weak return the Brewers got for Williams. Fedde’s value now isn’t much lower as he didn’t have that much to begin with. Had his season been reversed, had these last 4 starts come at the beginning instead of now, his value would be higher. Helsley, while not as successful as last year, will be in high demand, primarily because he’s stayed healthy.AZ_Cardsfan wrote: ↑20 Jul 2025 07:34 amI would disagree. I believe they intended to see the kids play a lot. But that doesn't mean throwing pitchers not ready to the wolves at the major league level. Player development means having success and learning how to win at a level they are ready for.RichieRichSTL wrote: ↑19 Jul 2025 20:29 pm You don't stubbornly keep running out Mikolas, Fedde if you care at all. Nor do you keep Helsley.
To me, it was an excuse to lower payroll, while trying to compete, not a true reset.
But good intentions went out the window when the team refused to be doormats and looked like a possible contender. Add to that attendance crashed harder than they expected. So now they are trying to play both sides.
Even so there is also being smart with control. Of they are going nowhere this year why call up a kid and waste a year of control. I mean OK if they are dominating the minors but their best pitching prospects are not dominating. Truly the only minor leaguer dominating anything is JJ and I would not break the path he is on for this year.
Cardinals are between a rock and a hard place of their own making. They should have been honest and dealt Fedde and Helsley last December when both had lots of value. And signed some journeymen pitching to protect the kids in the minors from being exposed too early. But they didn't.
Now that the team has actually looked a little like a playoff contender and fans are kinda returning how can they throw in the towel on a complete rebuild? Self inflicted problem IMO.
Decent ML starters are at a premium. So, a low cost reinvent himself pitcher with his 2024 numbers has value. 1 year at 7.5M? Ace level pitching gets 30M+ AAV. He is a fraction of that and he is just 1Y. If you get anything near 2024 at 7.5M thats a bargain. You wont get a top prospect but you dont get a Dylan Carlson pittance return. Acting like you were going to get pennies for him anyway is a cope.
Mo kept him as he wanted to hedge on 2025. He rationalized that he could still move him at mid-season. Instead what he got was a team that's competing among a scrum of teams to make the playoffs whose starting pitching and Offense has been exposed and a atater who lost most of his trade value.