T. O Neil update

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Goldfan
Forum User
Posts: 12021
Joined: 30 Mar 2019 07:58 am

T. O Neil update

Post by Goldfan »

102 AB
.176
3HR
11RBI

Mo really SUCKS. The trio of TO, Bader, and Carlson roaming the green OF of Busch for years to come……breaking young to middle aged ladies hearts as they pranced from dugout to field…..
Carp4Cy
Forum User
Posts: 2327
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:38 pm

Re: T. O Neil update

Post by Carp4Cy »

Mo sucks for trying them or he sucks for realizing the futility and moving on?

FWIW, each of them had at least one season for us that was better than their 2025 STL OF counterpart.
JDW
Forum User
Posts: 1189
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:42 pm

Re: T. O Neil update

Post by JDW »

Goldfan wrote: 14 Jul 2025 14:03 pm 102 AB
.176
3HR
11RBI

Mo really SUCKS. The trio of TO, Bader, and Carlson roaming the green OF of Busch for years to come……breaking young to middle aged ladies hearts as they pranced from dugout to field…..
Bader provided good value while with the Cards, then brought us Montgomery, who then brought us Roby, Saggese and King. Not bad.
TO also brought decent value while with the Cards, and they didn't make the mistake of extending him. Not terrible, but yes, they should have traded him earlier.
Wish Carlson had been traded earlier when he had decent value, but all 3 showed some potential while they were cost controlled, and the Cards never extended them. Kind of a silly thing to complain about.
Signing Fowler was the big mistake. Maybe w/o that signing, Arozarena gets more opportunity to show what he could do while with the Cards.
Goldfan
Forum User
Posts: 12021
Joined: 30 Mar 2019 07:58 am

Re: T. O Neil update

Post by Goldfan »

How many years were wasted on subpar talent?? This “give them a chance philosophy” should be utilized in minors only, not the Big Club
Out of all 3 I thought Carlson had the most natural baseball ability……..I think he’s lazy tho and didn’t put in the required work
In any case it didn’t take 5 yrs in Stl to figure out they weren’t the future.
riff raff
Forum User
Posts: 3481
Joined: 23 Oct 2020 15:44 pm

Re: T. O Neil update

Post by riff raff »

ruff ruff ....grrrrrrr
kscardsfan
Forum User
Posts: 302
Joined: 19 Jun 2023 10:38 am

Re: T. O Neil update

Post by kscardsfan »

Tyler was closest to being a good player. Carlson a huge waste of talent. Bader was just plain awful as a hitter. ( 2013) since we have had a good hitting outfield. That's too long to keep banking on young prospects.
nighthawk
Forum User
Posts: 906
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:38 pm

Re: T. O Neil update

Post by nighthawk »

Tyler has been better than Wily Mo Pena, but he's essentially the same kind of player.
JDW
Forum User
Posts: 1189
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:42 pm

Re: T. O Neil update

Post by JDW »

kscardsfan wrote: 14 Jul 2025 15:37 pm Tyler was closest to being a good player. Carlson a huge waste of talent. Bader was just plain awful as a hitter. ( 2013) since we have had a good hitting outfield. That's too long to keep banking on young prospects.
2021 did happen. Cards had a productive OF that year, just saying.
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 5689
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: T. O Neil update

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

I was wondering why there weren’t any of the daily TO is so awesome and cards were stupid for letting him go threads. There a bunch of them when he had his “massive” break out season when he drove in 61 runs lol I should have known he was sucking and that’s why the we love and miss the great TO threads stopped
riff raff
Forum User
Posts: 3481
Joined: 23 Oct 2020 15:44 pm

Re: T. O Neil update

Post by riff raff »

yeah but, yeah but, but mo really sucks
ClassicO
Forum User
Posts: 1278
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:37 pm

Re: T. O Neil update

Post by ClassicO »

JDW wrote: 14 Jul 2025 15:56 pm
kscardsfan wrote: 14 Jul 2025 15:37 pm Tyler was closest to being a good player. Carlson a huge waste of talent. Bader was just plain awful as a hitter. ( 2013) since we have had a good hitting outfield. That's too long to keep banking on young prospects.
2021 did happen. Cards had a productive OF that year, just saying.
Don't confuse them with facts!

The Cards OF in 2021 had the highest OF bWAR in baseball with 14.2 WAR vs Houston's 12.5. Most of the ABs were "the trio that went south."
https://www.baseball-reference.com/leag ... B&stat=WAR

Fangraphs fWAR had that OF #4, but almost all the positive WAR was from that trio. https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major ... s=0&P[ositively] O[bnoxious] S[impleton]=of

Like others since, the longer they stay with the club the worse they perform. Odd.
Melville
Forum User
Posts: 4041
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:16 pm

Re: T. O Neil update

Post by Melville »

ClassicO wrote: 14 Jul 2025 17:39 pm
JDW wrote: 14 Jul 2025 15:56 pm
kscardsfan wrote: 14 Jul 2025 15:37 pm Tyler was closest to being a good player. Carlson a huge waste of talent. Bader was just plain awful as a hitter. ( 2013) since we have had a good hitting outfield. That's too long to keep banking on young prospects.
2021 did happen. Cards had a productive OF that year, just saying.
Don't confuse them with facts!

The Cards OF in 2021 had the highest OF bWAR in baseball with 14.2 WAR vs Houston's 12.5. Most of the ABs were "the trio that went south."
https://www.baseball-reference.com/leag ... B&stat=WAR

Fangraphs fWAR had that OF #4, but almost all the positive WAR was from that trio. https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major ... [ositively] O[bnoxious] S[impleton]=of

Like others since, the longer they stay with the club the worse they perform. Odd.
Which yet again displays the idiocy of WAR.
icon
Forum User
Posts: 4312
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm

Re: T. O Neil update

Post by icon »

Melville wrote: 14 Jul 2025 18:50 pm
ClassicO wrote: 14 Jul 2025 17:39 pm
JDW wrote: 14 Jul 2025 15:56 pm
kscardsfan wrote: 14 Jul 2025 15:37 pm Tyler was closest to being a good player. Carlson a huge waste of talent. Bader was just plain awful as a hitter. ( 2013) since we have had a good hitting outfield. That's too long to keep banking on young prospects.
2021 did happen. Cards had a productive OF that year, just saying.
Don't confuse them with facts!

The Cards OF in 2021 had the highest OF bWAR in baseball with 14.2 WAR vs Houston's 12.5. Most of the ABs were "the trio that went south."
https://www.baseball-reference.com/leag ... B&stat=WAR

Fangraphs fWAR had that OF #4, but almost all the positive WAR was from that trio. https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major ... [ositively] O[bnoxious] S[impleton]=of

Like others since, the longer they stay with the club the worse they perform. Odd.
Which yet again displays the idiocy of WAR.
You don't need WAR to say TO had a good year in 2021 with 34 dingers and GG defense. He was really good that year, but he could only do it once.
Melville
Forum User
Posts: 4041
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:16 pm

Re: T. O Neil update

Post by Melville »

icon wrote: 14 Jul 2025 18:54 pm
Melville wrote: 14 Jul 2025 18:50 pm
ClassicO wrote: 14 Jul 2025 17:39 pm
JDW wrote: 14 Jul 2025 15:56 pm
kscardsfan wrote: 14 Jul 2025 15:37 pm Tyler was closest to being a good player. Carlson a huge waste of talent. Bader was just plain awful as a hitter. ( 2013) since we have had a good hitting outfield. That's too long to keep banking on young prospects.
2021 did happen. Cards had a productive OF that year, just saying.
Don't confuse them with facts!

The Cards OF in 2021 had the highest OF bWAR in baseball with 14.2 WAR vs Houston's 12.5. Most of the ABs were "the trio that went south."
https://www.baseball-reference.com/leag ... B&stat=WAR

Fangraphs fWAR had that OF #4, but almost all the positive WAR was from that trio. https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major ... [ositively] O[bnoxious] S[impleton]=of

Like others since, the longer they stay with the club the worse they perform. Odd.
Which yet again displays the idiocy of WAR.
You don't need WAR to say TO had a good year in 2021 with 34 dingers and GG defense. He was really good that year, but he could only do it once.
"You don't need WAR"
Absolutely correct.
It is a fiction.
Cusecards
Forum User
Posts: 10289
Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am

Re: T. O Neil update

Post by Cusecards »

riff raff wrote: 14 Jul 2025 17:04 pm yeah but, yeah but, but mo really sucks
I can’t imagine how some of these posters function in real life on a daily basis??
Goldfan
Forum User
Posts: 12021
Joined: 30 Mar 2019 07:58 am

Re: T. O Neil update

Post by Goldfan »

ClassicO wrote: 14 Jul 2025 17:39 pm
JDW wrote: 14 Jul 2025 15:56 pm
kscardsfan wrote: 14 Jul 2025 15:37 pm Tyler was closest to being a good player. Carlson a huge waste of talent. Bader was just plain awful as a hitter. ( 2013) since we have had a good hitting outfield. That's too long to keep banking on young prospects.
2021 did happen. Cards had a productive OF that year, just saying.
Don't confuse them with facts!

The Cards OF in 2021 had the highest OF bWAR in baseball with 14.2 WAR vs Houston's 12.5. Most of the ABs were "the trio that went south."
https://www.baseball-reference.com/leag ... B&stat=WAR

Fangraphs fWAR had that OF #4, but almost all the positive WAR was from that trio. https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major ... [ositively] O[bnoxious] S[impleton]=of

Like others since, the longer they stay with the club the worse they perform. Odd.
Out of 5-6 yrs……each one had ONE good season…..that is not a competent sustainable MLB OF
And since they left they’ve mostly been worse…..so in conclusion MO or whoever advises or advised MO in the Cards org are TERRIBLE talent assessors
And we’re probably seeing the same thing with half the YUTES we’re being forced to watch THIS YEAR to see if they’re ML players. Is this how a successful ML org is supposed to work? Calling up unknowns who probably aren’t worth the time and watch them for years to finally recognize they’re no good…
Post Reply