Superman

Moderator: STLtoday Forum Moderators

Armchair QB
Forum User
Posts: 2618
Joined: 09 Sep 2018 14:06 pm

Superman

Post by Armchair QB »

Is probably going to bomb. What a shame.
GOLDFINGER123
Forum User
Posts: 111
Joined: 14 Jan 2019 07:19 am

Re: Superman

Post by GOLDFINGER123 »

Why do you think that?
Backesdraft
Forum User
Posts: 461
Joined: 15 Mar 2019 07:23 am

Re: Superman

Post by Backesdraft »

Don’t we all have superhero fatigue? Jeez, how many of these movies can they make? It’s the same plot over and over and over again.
Armchair QB
Forum User
Posts: 2618
Joined: 09 Sep 2018 14:06 pm

Re: Superman

Post by Armchair QB »

GOLDFINGER123 wrote: 10 Jul 2025 16:07 pm Why do you think that?
Just a hunch. Probably not as bad as Snow White. But probably very poor at the box office.
Armchair QB
Forum User
Posts: 2618
Joined: 09 Sep 2018 14:06 pm

Re: Superman

Post by Armchair QB »

Backesdraft wrote: 10 Jul 2025 21:11 pm Don’t we all have superhero fatigue? Jeez, how many of these movies can they make? It’s the same plot over and over and over again.
Agree. I’ll vomit if another Avengers movie comes out.
Uncle John
Forum User
Posts: 146
Joined: 28 May 2024 15:47 pm

Re: Superman

Post by Uncle John »

Dicktar2023
Forum User
Posts: 1407
Joined: 25 Jul 2023 12:31 pm

Re: Superman

Post by Dicktar2023 »

Armchair QB wrote: 10 Jul 2025 21:54 pm
GOLDFINGER123 wrote: 10 Jul 2025 16:07 pm Why do you think that?
Just a hunch. Probably not as bad as Snow White. But probably very poor at the box office.
I think the days of superhero movies making $1 billion are over, but it won't bomb.
MikoTython
Forum User
Posts: 753
Joined: 21 Sep 2024 19:03 pm

Re: Superman

Post by MikoTython »

He looks like a goof :

Image
Uncle John
Forum User
Posts: 146
Joined: 28 May 2024 15:47 pm

Re: Superman

Post by Uncle John »

Dicktar2023
Forum User
Posts: 1407
Joined: 25 Jul 2023 12:31 pm

Re: Superman

Post by Dicktar2023 »

I take it back. This movie might end up bombing. It's hard to believe anybody who sees it once will want to see it again, so it might be all opening weekend.

It's terrible. Worse than I would have expected possible from Gunn. Snyder bros should give it a chance: if you liked the joyless tone and laughable CGI of Man of Steel, you should have no cause to complain about this unpleasant mess (aside from its brighter colors, which I know inflame Snyder's minions).

If Gunn and WB think they're going to build a new mega-franchise on this, they are in for a rude awakening.
WeeVikes
Forum User
Posts: 252
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:06 pm

Re: Superman

Post by WeeVikes »

Dicktar2023 wrote: 12 Jul 2025 14:57 pm I take it back. This movie might end up bombing. It's hard to believe anybody who sees it once will want to see it again, so it might be all opening weekend.

It's terrible. Worse than I would have expected possible from Gunn. Snyder bros should give it a chance: if you liked the joyless tone and laughable CGI of Man of Steel, you should have no cause to complain about this unpleasant mess (aside from its brighter colors, which I know inflame Snyder's minions).

If Gunn and WB think they're going to build a new mega-franchise on this, they are in for a rude awakening.
I’ve been avoiding reviews & such, and would like to keep things spoiler-free. From your comments is it fair to say Gunn delivered something more light and upbeat than the recent Superman offerings? Is this a film that having seen the Guardians movies one might say, “Yeah, I can see that this came from the same guy”?

Thank you, Dicktar.
Dicktar2023
Forum User
Posts: 1407
Joined: 25 Jul 2023 12:31 pm

Re: Superman

Post by Dicktar2023 »

WeeVikes wrote: 12 Jul 2025 15:16 pm
Dicktar2023 wrote: 12 Jul 2025 14:57 pm I take it back. This movie might end up bombing. It's hard to believe anybody who sees it once will want to see it again, so it might be all opening weekend.

It's terrible. Worse than I would have expected possible from Gunn. Snyder bros should give it a chance: if you liked the joyless tone and laughable CGI of Man of Steel, you should have no cause to complain about this unpleasant mess (aside from its brighter colors, which I know inflame Snyder's minions).

If Gunn and WB think they're going to build a new mega-franchise on this, they are in for a rude awakening.
I’ve been avoiding reviews & such, and would like to keep things spoiler-free. From your comments is it fair to say Gunn delivered something more light and upbeat than the recent Superman offerings? Is this a film that having seen the Guardians movies one might say, “Yeah, I can see that this came from the same guy”?

Thank you, Dicktar.
Actually, it's not that much more upbeat. I was also expecting some of the humor of GotG, but it's pretty dry and unpleasant. Mostly due to Gunn's baffling choice to turn Superman into a helpless dope who keeps needing to be rescued by his dog.

The political subplot is also not a lot of fun. Besides the fact that it mirrors a real-world tragedy, the arid dialogue that it takes to set it up reminded me of the opening crawl of The Phantom Menace. There was seriously a similar moment where I thought to myself "Oh no...this isn't just a little exposition, the whole movie is going to be like this."
WeeVikes
Forum User
Posts: 252
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:06 pm

Re: Superman

Post by WeeVikes »

Dicktar2023 wrote: 12 Jul 2025 15:27 pm
WeeVikes wrote: 12 Jul 2025 15:16 pm
Dicktar2023 wrote: 12 Jul 2025 14:57 pm I take it back. This movie might end up bombing. It's hard to believe anybody who sees it once will want to see it again, so it might be all opening weekend.

It's terrible. Worse than I would have expected possible from Gunn. Snyder bros should give it a chance: if you liked the joyless tone and laughable CGI of Man of Steel, you should have no cause to complain about this unpleasant mess (aside from its brighter colors, which I know inflame Snyder's minions).

If Gunn and WB think they're going to build a new mega-franchise on this, they are in for a rude awakening.
I’ve been avoiding reviews & such, and would like to keep things spoiler-free. From your comments is it fair to say Gunn delivered something more light and upbeat than the recent Superman offerings? Is this a film that having seen the Guardians movies one might say, “Yeah, I can see that this came from the same guy”?

Thank you, Dicktar.
Actually, it's not that much more upbeat. I was also expecting some of the humor of GotG, but it's pretty dry and unpleasant. Mostly due to Gunn's baffling choice to turn Superman into a helpless dope who keeps needing to be rescued by his dog.

The political subplot is also not a lot of fun. Besides the fact that it mirrors a real-world tragedy, the arid dialogue that it takes to set it up reminded me of the opening crawl of The Phantom Menace. There was seriously a similar moment where I thought to myself "Oh no...this isn't just a little exposition, the whole movie is going to be like this."
Wow, that’s disappointing.

Thanks, man.
todd-parker
Forum User
Posts: 689
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:20 pm

Re: Superman

Post by todd-parker »

Really enjoyed this movie and thought it was a lot of fun - a sentiment shared with the group I saw it with. Took about the first 15-20 minutes to kind of get into the groove with what this version of Superman was going to be like and shake off the expectations ingrained from the last ten years of Snyder DC films. A lot of good casting choices and performances here: Lois Lane, Mr. Terrific, Guy Gardner, Hawkgirl, Lex Luthor and, of course, Superman.
Is this a perfect movie? Of course not, but what comic book movie is? I would certainly re-watch this one before any of the stuff Marvel has put out post-Endgame (Thor: Love and Thunder, anyone?). Definitely looking forward to seeing how this world is built out starting with the next season of Peacemaker.

Rumor has it that James Gunn may get Godzilla Minus One director, Takashi Yamazaki, in on the new DCU. That is intriguing.

If anything, this movie is better than F1 and light years better than the god-awful Jurassic World: Rebirth.
WeeVikes
Forum User
Posts: 252
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:06 pm

Re: Superman

Post by WeeVikes »

todd-parker wrote: 13 Jul 2025 07:30 am.

Rumor has it that James Gunn may get Godzilla Minus One director, Takashi Yamazaki, in on the new DCU. That is intriguing.

If anything, this movie is better than F1 and light years better than the god-awful Jurassic World: Rebirth.
interesting.

I love Minus One. A lot. It’d be cool to see what he could do with DC.

I haven’t seen the new Jurassic World, but I enjoyed F1 a lot. Yeah, it was basically “Top Gun” with race cars, but that’s what I was expecting and I had a ton of fun with it. If Superman is better than that, then that bodes well for me.
todd-parker
Forum User
Posts: 689
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:20 pm

Re: Superman

Post by todd-parker »

WeeVikes wrote: 13 Jul 2025 10:12 am
todd-parker wrote: 13 Jul 2025 07:30 am.

Rumor has it that James Gunn may get Godzilla Minus One director, Takashi Yamazaki, in on the new DCU. That is intriguing.

If anything, this movie is better than F1 and light years better than the god-awful Jurassic World: Rebirth.
interesting.

I love Minus One. A lot. It’d be cool to see what he could do with DC.

I haven’t seen the new Jurassic World, but I enjoyed F1 a lot. Yeah, it was basically “Top Gun” with race cars, but that’s what I was expecting and I had a ton of fun with it. If Superman is better than that, then that bodes well for me.
Agree with the F1 take. The racing sequences were top notch and it is a fun movie. Take away the unnecessary love interest side-plot and it would have ranked higher in my book.

Of course, art is subjective. Everyone is going to have a different take depending on their personal taste. But, if you enjoyed Gunn's other movies (Guardians of the Galaxy, Suicide Squad) then you should get some enjoyment out of Superman.
Post Reply