I think...and I could be wrong, but it's looking more and more like the 1 and 2 picks in the draft will look like this:
1. Nationals ~ Anderson ....or Holliday
2. Angels ~ Doyle ....what the pundits are hearing is this pick is done. That's the Angels pick.
Nationals could still pick Holliday, maybe Willits, I'm not saying they won't. The trend and the buzz is it's down to a clear 1a / 1b strategy....1a is Anderson, and that's how they're currently leaning...there's still the Holliday crowd in their draft room....Bonus Demands/Signability are a major concern, too
---------------
If the Anderson and Doyle scenario plays out....you have the next 3 teams (M's, Rox, Cards) with a big crowd of 45/50 rated players to choose from....outside note ~ Seth Hernandez is the only one of the bunch, imo, rated 55-60...you can't have arguably the best FB, Curve, Change, and Control in the class and be rated 45/50 just because you're a HS/RHP....that bias is annoying to be honest.
this draft is so weak up top, that it's allowed players such as Irish, Aloy, Parker, Steele to jump into the conversation @ #5....those players are good in their own right, I'm not besmirching them, but they're #20-30 picks in last year's draft...easily. I really like Irish and Parker, I wish we were picking #7 to 15 this year b/c of them.
Again... I'm leaning back on my philosophy from a few weeks ago...."5 that I want, and 5 that I wouldn't be Unhappy with"....that's how bad of a draft it is up top....nothing has changed....and it's the biggest reason I keep Hernandez as my #1 player overall . He's just that much better than everyone else, but he has an unfair taboo tied around his neck.
