Here is the TL:DR version of how the AI came up with the analysis. I can post in the depth model it used if anybody is interested.
"To analyze each Blues 2020 draft pick, I gathered stats and scouting reports from trusted sources like HockeyDB, EliteProspects, NHL.com, and The Athletic. I looked at things like how well they’ve played in college, junior, or the minors, how big and skilled they are, and what role they might fill on an NHL team. Then I gave each player a 1–10 rating for how good they could become, plus a letter grade (A–F) to show how likely they are to reach that level. I also factored in things like injuries, depth charts, and similar players to give a realistic, well-rounded view of their future."
Jake Neighbours
Left Wing -- shoots L
Born Mar 29 2002 -- Calgary, ALTA
[23 yrs. ago]
Height 6.00 -- Weight 201 [183 cm/91 kg]
Round 1, 26th overall
Strengths & Development✔ Offensive Instincts & Scoring Efficiency
* Strong goal-scoring ability; 27 goals in 77 games—comparable to Lafrenière & Stützle in 2023–24
* High shooting percentage (18.5%) reflects smart shot selection
✔ Physical Commitment & Workrate
* Known for hits, forechecking, board play—"brick wall" physical presence
* Mature, responsible player with playoff readiness
⚠ Areas for Growth
* Underwhelming shot attempt metrics suggest tougher puck possession scenarios
* Limited playmaking assists—looking for growth in play-driving and play creation
Numeric & Likelihood Grade* Numeric Grade: 7 – A solid NHL regular, likely middle-six winger with scoring upside and physical edge.
* Comparable Players:
* Brent Morrow – power forward with offensive upside
* Dallas Drake – physical winger, secondary scoring
Likelihood Grade: B
* Probability: ~82% chance of maintaining mid to upper middle-six production
* Risks include Corsi ceiling and reliance on shooting %, but consistent NHL role is highly probable
Final Grade: 7B
Report Accuracy EstimateThis report pulls from 5+ contemporary analytics sources, clear statistical trends, and established scouting consensus with no major unknowns or speculative elements. Estimated accuracy: 88%,reflecting strong confidence with a small margin for variation in projection or unforeseen development.
Summary* Jake Neighbours (7B) is a reliable, scoring-minded middle-six winger with physical impact and a proven NHL presence.
* His key strengths include goal threat and board play; main challenges are puck possession limitations and creative playmaking depth.
* With his current trajectory, expect consistency as a solid NHL contributor, with upside to push higher with improved play-driving metrics.
Dylan Peterson
Center -- shoots R
Born Jan 8 2002 -- Roseville, CA
[23 yrs. ago]
Height 6.04 -- Weight 195 [193 cm/88 kg]
Round 3, 86th overall
Skillset Evaluation✔ Physical & Net-front Strength
* Uses size to dominate in cycle and front-of-net battles; strong board play
✔ Two-way Work Ethic
* High-intensity engine; aggressive in forecheck and willing to engage physically—82 PIM indicate grit
✔ Playmaking & IQ
* Identifies outlets post possession recovery; shows hockey instinct in tight situations
⚠ Areas to Develop
* Offensive upside limited—projected third/fourth-line NHLer unless offensive skills improve
* Skating mechanics need polish; mobility in pro game will require more refinement
Numeric & Likelihood Grades Numeric Grade: 6* Outlook: Reliable bottom-six NHLer with potential for secondary scoring and PK/power-play versatility
* Ceiling comparison: A hybrid between Brandon Sutter and Tage Thompson—size + physicality + (occasional) scoring depth
Likelihood Grade: B (~80–85%)* Strong factors: size, hard-motor, strong AHL debut
* Risks: limited offense, skating needs, slower offensive upside
Final Rating: 6B
Report Accuracy EstimateComprehensive data from NCAA, AHL, scouting commentary, and analytics
Predictive outlook based on playing style and pro transition typical for late-round picks
Estimated accuracy: 82%, given moderate certainty with standard developmental variance.
Leo Loof
Defense -- shoots L
Born Apr 25 2002 -- Karlstad, Sweden
[23 yrs. ago]
Height 6.02 -- Weight 176 [188 cm/80 kg]
Round 3, 86th overall
Skillset Evaluation✔ Defensive Strength & Physicality
* Known for heavy hits, board battles, net-front presence. Fought twice in 2023–24 and 2024–25
✔ Poise & Technical Skill
* Elite prospects report highlights his fine stick-handling, positioning, and defensively sound decision-making
✔ Transition Game
* Reliable outlet passing; good first-pass vision in breakout → Editor notes from EP and Dobber
⚠ Areas to Improve
* Offensive Output: Not a point producer; lacks impact on power play
* Possession Metrics: Corsi near 50%; reliance on positive PDO suggests some luck
Prospect GradingNumeric Grade: 6
* Profile: Reliable bottom-pairing NHL defenseman; steady in own zone but limited scoring upside
* Comparable NHLers: Uwe Krupp or Mike Rathje
Likelihood Grade: C (~70–75%)
* Strong defensive foundation and durable European-to-AHL transition are positives
* Risks: lack of dynamic offense and modest puck-possession impact may plateau development
Final Grade: 6C
Projection & Development Trajectory* Short-term (1–2 yrs): Continue as AHL mainstay. Expect spot NHL call-ups in injury scenarios or matchup-specific usage.
* Medium-term (by 2027): Solidify as NHL 5–6 defenseman; PK specialist and depth defender with occasional physical edge.
* Upside (best-case): Two-way depth defenseman capable of 18+ minutes/game, reliable in shutdown roles. Ceiling aligns with Ian Cole-type player.
Leo Lööf projects as a 6C—a physically engaged, defensively reliable bottom-pair defender with strong odds to carve out a consistent NHL role. Improvements in offensive capability or puck metrics would significantly elevate his trajectory.
Report Accuracy EstimateThis evaluation is based on verified statistical trends, scouting consensus from EliteProspects, DobberProspects, and credible AHL/NHL transitions.
Estimated accuracy: ~84%, reflecting moderate confidence given potential developmental ceiling and competition for NHL roster spots.Tanner Dickinson
Center -- shoots L
Born Mar 5 2002 -- Perrysburg, OH
[23 yrs. ago]
Height 6.00 -- Weight 183 [183 cm/83 kg]
4th round, 119th overall
Strengths & Skillset✔ Speed & Puck Transport:
* Explosive skating and pace; excels carrying the puck through zones
✔ Hockey IQ & Vision:
* Reads game well, soft passing, stabilizes puck battles with poise
✔ Resilience & Character:
* Overcame broken femur and long development path; strong commitment through adversity
⚠ Areas for Growth
* Physical Build: Needs to add muscle and stamina to sustain AHL/NHL pace
* Consistency & Physicality: Forechecking and board play need to be more assertive
* Offensive Ceiling: Scoring and playmaking remain modest at the pro level; may cap as depth forward
Numeric & Likelihood Grade* Numeric Grade: 6 – Depth NHL forward with upside for a bottom-six, PK or energy line role.
* Comparable Prospects/NHLers: Think Brandon Sutter meets Alex Chiasson mix— work ethic, secondary scoring.
* Likelihood Grade: D (~60–65%)
* Strong foundational tools (speed, IQ, resilience) balanced by moderate offensive upside & physicality development curve.
Final Rating: 6D
Report Accuracy Estimate* Fully based on verified stats, injury history, development path, and professional trajectory.
* Estimated Accuracy: 82%, acknowledging developmental variance and competition within organization.
Matt Kessel
Defense -- shoots R
Born Jun 23 2000 -- Bloomfield Hills, MI
[25 yrs. ago]
Height 6.02 -- Weight 205 [188 cm/93 kg]
Round 5, 150th Overall
Skillset & Developmental Profile✔ Size & Physicality
* Big American defenseman, combines size with mobility. Powered through US and NCAA leagues
✔ Responsible Defensive Play
* UMass nods for defensive awareness; trusted in top pairing roles
* Transition tool: moves puck well, reliable outlet prowess
✔ Gradual Adaptation
* Earned NHL minutes as injury replacement, stayed composed. Received second contract extension
⚠ Developmental Chasms
* Offense remains limited—defensive profile over flashy points
* Underlying possession numbers unclear; puck-possession upside may be limited
Prospect Grade
Numeric Grade: 6* A reliable bottom-pair NHL defenseman with gradual upward trajectory.
* Comparable to players like Jordan Oesterle or Cody Ceci—solid defensively, occasional offense.
Likelihood Grade: C (~72–78%)* Consistent NCAA/AHL progression and NHL dependability support a strong but not elite projection.
* Offensive limitations and depth role constrain ceiling growth.
Final Rating: 6C
Projection & Path* Short-Term (1–2 years): Likely AHL/mainstay with intermittent NHL call-ups; remains top organizational option for injury support.
* Mid-Term (by 2026–27): Establishes as dependable third-pairing NHL defenseman; occasional power-play duty.
* Ceiling: 18–20 minute, defensively reliable NHL defenseman, occasional offense.
Report Accuracy EstimateThis evaluation relies on statistically supported development arcs, scouting consistency, and recent contract behavior: Estimated Accuracy: ~83%
Will Cranley
Goalie -- shoots L
Born Feb 26 2002 -- Peterborough, ONT
[23 yrs. ago]
Height 6.04 -- Weight 185 [193 cm/84 kg]
Round 6, #163 Overall
Strengths & Areas to Improve✔ Strengths
* Size & Reach: At 6'4", offers ideal goaltending frame, a key asset identified by Blues scouts .
* Solid ECHL Performance: Mid-2.70s GAA and high .896 SV% across 23 games show promise. Occasional shutouts reflect capacity to steal contests
* Organizational Trust: Under contract through 2026 and already earned NHL recalls—evidence of Blues’ confidence
⚠ Areas for Development
* Limited High-Level Exposure: Only 2 AHL games and no NHL regular-season starts; performance there (4.91 GAA, .867 SV%) needs improvement
* Inconsistent Results: Sub-.890 SV% in ECHL/ECHL averages suggest room for refinement .
* Depth Chart Positioning: Competing behind AHL starter Zherenko and prospect Ellis; his path to NHL starts blocked
Prospect Grades* Numeric Grade (1–10): 4 - developing goaltender with upside but significant distance from being NHL-ready. Likely settling as an organizational depth option unless major development occurs.
* Likelihood Grade (A–F): C (~70–79%) Moderate probability to reach AHL backup/occasional NHL call-up role. Needs steady AHL performance to proceed upward.
Final Rating: 4C
Projection & Timeline* Short-term (1–2 yrs): Take on primary starter duties in ECHL with consistent AHL relief role, occasional NHL backup via injuries.
* Mid-term (by 2026–27): Could become AHL starter and competes for third-string NHL depth; Top-2 NHL minutes unlikely without performance leap.
* Upside Scenario: Reaches reliable AHL starter, peeks into NHL controlled situations; could force stronger role with improved consistency.
Report Accuracy EstimateThis assessment integrates verified stats across three pro tiers (ECHL, AHL, NHL call-ins), depth chart analysis, and scouting context from Blues sources. Estimated Accuracy: 78%, reflecting solid insight with room for variance depending on AHL performance and developmental trajectory.
Noah Beck
Defense -- shoots L
Born Mar 25 2001 -- Richmond Hill, ONT
[24 yrs. ago]
Height 6.03 -- Weight 206 [191 cm/93 kg]
Round 7, 194th Overall
Strengths & Scout Notes✔ NHL‑Ready Size & Mobility At 6′3″ and 205 lb, Beck has the size and structural tools that attract professional
✔ Offensive Instincts & Playmaking
* Led ASU D-men with 33 pts in 37 games—strong production
* Recognized for offensive defenseman upside by Dobber & The Athletic’s Wheeler .
✔ Hockey IQ & Disruptive Stick Work
* Praised for stick-checking and defensive awareness—effective at disrupting puck-carriers .
⚠ Development Risks
Skating Concerns
Wheeler (The Athletic) notes "skating is a major red flag"—lack of dynamic footwork could inhibit pro-level 
Inconsistent Performance Curve* Offense dipped during senior year at Clarkson, partially due to a hand injury
* Needs to stabilize offensive consistency across higher-level competition.
⚔ Competition at Pro Level
* Only one AHL outing so far; NHL depth chart is competitive, and contract is only one year
Prospect Shot MeterNumeric Grade: 6 – Projects as a two-way, depth or bottom-pairing NHL defenseman with power-play adaptability, depending on skating improvement and offensive consistency.
Player Comparables:
* A mix of Brandon Montour (offensive D with size) and Niclas Havelid(two-way responsibilities, not top‑pair).
Likelihood Grade: D (~60–64%) – Offensive potential and size are assets, but skating and consistency concerns outweigh upside. Realistic pathway is AHL starter or NHL depth.
Final Grade: 6D
Report Accuracy EstimateWith college and early pro performance data, combined with credible scouting, expectations are grounded in developmental norms for late-round picks.
Estimated accuracy: ~80%, acknowledging variability depending on skating and pro adaptation.
Player Snapshot
Highlights & Video