Who did Colorado have on the ltir?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:27 amwhich is just ridiculous.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:12 amI may be wrong, but until Florida won the Cup last season, our Blues were the last "CAP compliant" Cup winner.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 09:58 amYep, I figured the obvious games teams like Tampa and LV played and this year Edmonton would finally get GM's to go "Yeah this isn't what this was intended for"Hockey Pete wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 09:56 am Looking at the new NHL CBA Proposal, it has this little tidbit;
•A comprehensive playoff salary cap mechanism, which has many machinations to account for player acquisition, will effectively close the LTIR loophole for teams to significantly pad payroll by using injury relief space.
FINALLY...
It's about time.
New CBA Proposal Closes the LTIR Playoff Loophole
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 811
- Joined: 24 May 2024 10:31 am
Re: New CBA Proposal Closes the LTIR Playoff Loophole
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm
Re: New CBA Proposal Closes the LTIR Playoff Loophole
Well he's definitely getting more than 9 and probably less than 15 so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯BalotelliMassive wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:26 amIf you could have an all stat at 9 or 15 million then what would you rather have...?bluetunehead wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:23 amyou don't get the extra year freeBalotelliMassive wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:16 amIt could be a savings of 15 million in one year if he keep progressing....bluetunehead wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:11 amWhat will they ever do if they can only sign him for one less year than they can nowBalotelliMassive wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:04 am I saw that they want seven year contracts to be the max....Chicago has to sign Bedard before this kicks in.
Re: New CBA Proposal Closes the LTIR Playoff Loophole
BalotelliMassive wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:29 amYeah....he's horrible said the kid with snot running into his slackjaw....Natl20 wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:19 amFind another 20 goal scorer!bluetunehead wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:11 amWhat will they ever do if they can only sign him for one less year than they can nowBalotelliMassive wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:04 am I saw that they want seven year contracts to be the max....Chicago has to sign Bedard before this kicks in.
![]()


Assume we aren't counting TOI in these milestones? Playing 3 more mins a game than the others def helps, thats essentially playing 4 full 60 min games more over the course of 82 games
Re: New CBA Proposal Closes the LTIR Playoff Loophole
I don't know what the unintended consequences would be of teams having to ice a team under the same salary cap in the post seasons as they did in the regular season. They could have been down a $8m player and replaced him with another $8m player in the regular season, but come the playoffs and they both can play then the team picks which one plays and which one watches to comply with the cap. Of course they could play them both and sit a couple other players that add up to $8m but that's up to them. My hypothetical obviously assumes a team is 100% against the cap.
I don't see this as an overly complicated situation to solve and would put all teams on the same competitive level they played the regular season in.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 316
- Joined: 25 May 2024 10:43 am
Re: New CBA Proposal Closes the LTIR Playoff Loophole
I don't remember whose LTIR they used, but the traded for Josh Manson and used LTIR to ice a full team in the playoffs (I believe they were 2+ million over the CAP with their playoff team).BalotelliMassive wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:32 amWho did Colorado have on the ltir?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:27 amwhich is just ridiculous.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:12 amI may be wrong, but until Florida won the Cup last season, our Blues were the last "CAP compliant" Cup winner.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 09:58 amYep, I figured the obvious games teams like Tampa and LV played and this year Edmonton would finally get GM's to go "Yeah this isn't what this was intended for"Hockey Pete wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 09:56 am Looking at the new NHL CBA Proposal, it has this little tidbit;
•A comprehensive playoff salary cap mechanism, which has many machinations to account for player acquisition, will effectively close the LTIR loophole for teams to significantly pad payroll by using injury relief space.
FINALLY...
It's about time.
Re: New CBA Proposal Closes the LTIR Playoff Loophole
It was Landeskoog.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 11:15 amI don't remember whose LTIR they used, but the traded for Josh Manson and used LTIR to ice a full team in the playoffs (I believe they were 2+ million over the CAP with their playoff team).BalotelliMassive wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:32 amWho did Colorado have on the ltir?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:27 amwhich is just ridiculous.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 10:12 amI may be wrong, but until Florida won the Cup last season, our Blues were the last "CAP compliant" Cup winner.TheJackBurton wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 09:58 amYep, I figured the obvious games teams like Tampa and LV played and this year Edmonton would finally get GM's to go "Yeah this isn't what this was intended for"Hockey Pete wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 09:56 am Looking at the new NHL CBA Proposal, it has this little tidbit;
•A comprehensive playoff salary cap mechanism, which has many machinations to account for player acquisition, will effectively close the LTIR loophole for teams to significantly pad payroll by using injury relief space.
FINALLY...
It's about time.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1293
- Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm
Re: New CBA Proposal Closes the LTIR Playoff Loophole
I could be wrong, but I thought I read where the 20 skaters for any playoff game would need to be cap compliant, not the roster itself. Again, there were several proposals and articles, so I may have read this wrong. It will be interesting to see the final language on this.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: New CBA Proposal Closes the LTIR Playoff Loophole
the roster I would assume. You can't be over the cap with healthy scratches during the regular season, so why should the playoffs not follow the same logic?TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025 12:52 pm I could be wrong, but I thought I read where the 20 skaters for any playoff game would need to be cap compliant, not the roster itself. Again, there were several proposals and articles, so I may have read this wrong. It will be interesting to see the final language on this.
When Vegas won the cup, the team they iced was actually cap compliant. However they had 15+ million sitting in the press box.
The rule should be your 23 man roster has to be cap compliant, anyone that puts you over has to be scratched and ineligible for the series.
You can make changes at the end of each series.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1753
- Joined: 04 Jan 2019 22:28 pm
Re: New CBA Proposal Closes the LTIR Playoff Loophole
And no more deferred-money contracts. That's what enabled the original St. Louis Blues to sign iconic former stars for another season or two....and eventually forced the Salomons to sell the team to Ralston-Purina once the nightly sellouts ended.
A longer regular season (84 games), but shorter preseason (4 games per team).
A longer regular season (84 games), but shorter preseason (4 games per team).
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 867
- Joined: 23 May 2024 19:52 pm
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm
Re: New CBA Proposal Closes the LTIR Playoff Loophole
From Seravalli. No real details on how they're changing LTIR yet, just that it's changing to close the loophole.

-
- Forum User
- Posts: 413
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:40 pm
Re: New CBA Proposal Closes the LTIR Playoff Loophole
This is a good thing. It evens out the playing field between high market teams and small market teams. The NHL got this one right.