Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

cardinalsfever44
Forum User
Posts: 877
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:03 pm

Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Post by cardinalsfever44 »

Per Derrick Goold:

Cards sign Garrett Hampson and DFA Barrero.
Talkin' Baseball
Forum User
Posts: 1401
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm

Re: Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Post by Talkin' Baseball »

Very proactive. Dealing well ahead of the deadline.
Pink Freud
Banned User
Posts: 1753
Joined: 04 Jan 2019 22:28 pm

Re: Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Post by Pink Freud »

Hampson's been non-tendered or released by five clubs recently. Do the Cards just need a warm-body rental for now?
82birds
Forum User
Posts: 15424
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:17 pm

Re: Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Post by 82birds »

Cubs should be worried :roll:
Futuregm2
Forum User
Posts: 7832
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm

Re: Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Post by Futuregm2 »

82birds wrote: 24 Jun 2025 16:29 pm Cubs should be worried :roll:
I was hoping he was one of those guys that does really well against a club and that club was the Cubs. But alas, he has a career .698 OPS vs the Cubs. His OPS against the Reds is .902 though.
Wattage
Forum User
Posts: 1817
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:54 pm

Re: Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Post by Wattage »

Pink Freud wrote: 24 Jun 2025 16:18 pm Hampson's been non-tendered or released by five clubs recently. Do the Cards just need a warm-body rental for now?
Barrero couldnt hit or field.

Hampson is just as versatile and cant hit either but can at least somewhat field.
Red7
Forum User
Posts: 3467
Joined: 18 Dec 2018 18:09 pm

Re: Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Post by Red7 »

This is clearly a DEI hire by the Cardinals. Barrero had too little production and too much melanin.
RunSup
Forum User
Posts: 3141
Joined: 07 Dec 2022 19:08 pm

Re: Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Post by RunSup »

Taylor Motter?

Just keep Saggese up and call up Siani to spell Scott in CF.
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 5726
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

I was wondering why they would drop Barrero for him both are utility guys neither can hit but barrero has much better physical tools but reading about Hampson I guess he is a pretty solid defensive player so it makes sense. If neither can hit take the one that can field. Barrero was pretty bad on defense
Goldfan
Forum User
Posts: 12021
Joined: 30 Mar 2019 07:58 am

Re: Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Post by Goldfan »

Ozziesfan41 wrote: 24 Jun 2025 18:57 pm I was wondering why they would drop Barrero for him both are utility guys neither can hit but barrero has much better physical tools but reading about Hampson I guess he is a pretty solid defensive player so it makes sense. If neither can hit take the one that can field. Barrero was pretty bad on defense
Question……why isn’t there a much better internal option ?
cardstatman
Forum User
Posts: 2542
Joined: 23 May 2024 22:10 pm

Re: Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Post by cardstatman »

Goldfan wrote: 24 Jun 2025 19:01 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 24 Jun 2025 18:57 pm I was wondering why they would drop Barrero for him both are utility guys neither can hit but barrero has much better physical tools but reading about Hampson I guess he is a pretty solid defensive player so it makes sense. If neither can hit take the one that can field. Barrero was pretty bad on defense
Question……why isn’t there a much better internal option ?
Guessing they don't want Saggese to sit on the MLB bench. Hampson is a great candidate to sit while others actually play. Call him the emergency guy.
cardstatman
Forum User
Posts: 2542
Joined: 23 May 2024 22:10 pm

Re: Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Post by cardstatman »

Ozziesfan41 wrote: 24 Jun 2025 18:57 pm I was wondering why they would drop Barrero for him both are utility guys neither can hit but barrero has much better physical tools but reading about Hampson I guess he is a pretty solid defensive player so it makes sense. If neither can hit take the one that can field. Barrero was pretty bad on defense
This move is going to actually cost the Cardinals almost half million dollars. They must have had a clear preference for Hampson over Barrero.
82birds
Forum User
Posts: 15424
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:17 pm

Re: Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Post by 82birds »

Ozziesfan41 wrote: 24 Jun 2025 18:57 pm I was wondering why they would drop Barrero for him both are utility guys neither can hit but barrero has much better physical tools but reading about Hampson I guess he is a pretty solid defensive player so it makes sense. If neither can hit take the one that can field. Barrero was pretty bad on defense
unless you count that game-saving diving catch to his left of a line drive the other night
Basil Shabazz
Forum User
Posts: 1300
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Post by Basil Shabazz »

Hampson is highly regarded by Arenado.

Not sure if that was part of the motivation.

But, I’d seen enough of Barrero. I was intrigued by Barrero but after watching him I realize why he never sticks. High ceiling…. Very low floor!!
Jobu's Rum
Forum User
Posts: 570
Joined: 26 May 2024 10:10 am

Re: Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Post by Jobu's Rum »

Yeah i was rooting for Barrero, was hoping we could at least stash him in Memphis and maybe he figured it out. Reminded me of Joe Mather, just looks like a baseball player but never shined. But ah well
Cusecards
Forum User
Posts: 10293
Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am

Re: Cards Sign Garrett Hampson

Post by Cusecards »

They swapped one versatile bench guy for another.
Hampson more experienced and I guess a better fielder?
Even if Arenado is dealt they still are pretty deep in the IF so Barrero or Hampson is meh.
Post Reply