b-a-a-a-rclay wrote: ↑21 Jun 2025 08:49 am
From DA interview after the season he mentioned a 200 ft player who could add scoring. Do we see Granlund as a 200 ft player? I hope the Blues don't go in that direction. I also doubt that he signs for less than 3 years.
Granlund gets regular PK time(1:57 per game in SJ, tied for 2nd most among Sharks forwards; 51 seconds per game in Dallas(the #4 PK unit in the League last year), #6 among Stars forwards despite only playing 31 games for them), so he clearly isn't an outright liability on defense(despite the narrative).
He's certainly not what you'd call a "shutdown" center, but he's not the 1-dimensional player some people are making him out to be.
rezero wrote:This. We need a center who is defensively elite, even at the cost of offense. Thomas is not strong defensively as a 1C so we have historically had trouble matching him with Kyrou who is also not strong defensively. Plus, some of our young players like Bolduc, Snuggs,and Dvorsky are more offense first and their defense has not yet matured. We need a strong defensive, veteran center.
I wish we would have found a way to hang on to Barbashev as at $5M per year he is under a team friendly contract. He now plays wing mainly with Eichel though, but he is defensively very solid.
I don't agree with this take at all.
If you want a defensive center, you roll Sunny and Faksa back out there for another year. All those guys can do at this point is play defense.
We don't need a defensively elite center; we need an offensive center so we can actually roll a 3-line attack.
What we need is somebody that can actually make an effective line with Neighbours and Bolduc. Whether that's by gelling with those two outright or by knocking Schenn down a line. We need that 3rd line to be a legit threat, otherwise we're at the same place we are right now. One injury to our top 4 forwards(Thomas, Kyrou, Holloway, Buch) and our offense is toast.
I'm not super fixated on Granlund, but he checks a LOT of the boxes for what we need.