Petro

[theograce]

If he can play in Game 1 of the playoffs at a Conn level, he could've played in Game 82. That's the issue and, yes, he'd complicit because he went along with it, which is why i brought up Reaves.

Would you say the same about a concussion. No you wouldn’t. Gonna inflate risk at game 82?

That makes zero sense

[Aesa]

If he can play in Game 1 of the playoffs at a Conn level, he could've played in Game 82. That's the issue and, yes, he'd complicit because he went along with it, which is why i brought up Reaves.

Would you say the same about a concussion. No you wouldn’t. Gonna inflate risk at game 82?

That makes zero sense

Can you unequivically state he DID have a concussion? My guess is NO.

[theograce]

If he can play in Game 1 of the playoffs at a Conn level, he could've played in Game 82. That's the issue and, yes, he'd complicit because he went along with it, which is why i brought up Reaves.

Would you say the same about a concussion. No you wouldn’t. Gonna inflate risk at game 82?

That makes zero sense

Can you unequivically state he DID have a concussion? My guess is NO.

What are you even on about. Mind your business when you can’t read/infer properly.

[MiamiLaw]

If he can play in Game 1 of the playoffs at a Conn level, he could've played in Game 82. That's the issue and, yes, he'd complicit because he went along with it, which is why i brought up Reaves.

Would you say the same about a concussion. No you wouldn’t. Gonna inflate risk at game 82?

That makes zero sense

Why does it matter what the injury is though? He is either able to play or not. If he can play, he should be activated. Obviously, a lot of guys sit out Game 82 if it is meaningless, but those guys aren't on LTIR. The team isn't over the cap with them activated but in the pressbox.

Whether he physically plays or not isn't relevant to the obvious abuse of LTIR. The issue is whether he should be activated from LTIR. it seems like once a guy is on LTIR, teams are able to just kind of decide when they activate the player and there isn't much the league can do. Good to see them finally checking into it with Kane. Many fans hate the obvious gaming of the system. For me, Stone has forever tarnished his legacy.

[Aesa]

If he can play in Game 1 of the playoffs at a Conn level, he could've played in Game 82. That's the issue and, yes, he'd complicit because he went along with it, which is why i brought up Reaves.

Would you say the same about a concussion. No you wouldn’t. Gonna inflate risk at game 82?

That makes zero sense

Can you unequivically state he DID have a concussion? My guess is NO.

What are you even on about. Mind your business when you can’t read/infer properly.

I'll take that as a definitve NO. Thanks for your usual deflections and not directly answering a question.

[theograce]

If he can play in Game 1 of the playoffs at a Conn level, he could've played in Game 82. That's the issue and, yes, he'd complicit because he went along with it, which is why i brought up Reaves.

Would you say the same about a concussion. No you wouldn’t. Gonna inflate risk at game 82?

That makes zero sense

Can you unequivically state he DID have a concussion? My guess is NO.

What are you even on about. Mind your business when you can’t read/infer properly.

I'll take that as a definitve NO. Thanks for your usual deflections and not directly answering a question.

I wasn’t talking about stone there. There was no “he” in the statement. What’s your FSIQ

[callitwhatyouwant]

If he can play in Game 1 of the playoffs at a Conn level, he could've played in Game 82. That's the issue and, yes, he'd complicit because he went along with it, which is why i brought up Reaves.

Would you say the same about a concussion. No you wouldn’t. Gonna inflate risk at game 82?

That makes zero sense

Can you unequivically state he DID have a concussion? My guess is NO.

I think you guys are a debating a Bot. IT's default settings is opposition to everything on the Blues board.

[Bubble4427]

If he can play in Game 1 of the playoffs at a Conn level, he could've played in Game 82. That's the issue and, yes, he'd complicit because he went along with it, which is why i brought up Reaves.

Would you say the same about a concussion. No you wouldn’t. Gonna inflate risk at game 82?

That makes zero sense

Can you unequivically state he DID have a concussion? My guess is NO.

I think you guys are a debating a Bot. IT's default settings is opposition to everything on the Blues board.

He’s a bot alright.
A bottom feeder.

[dhsux]

I think you guys are a debating a Bot. IT's default settings is opposition to everything on the Blues board.

Oh.....he's a fan.....a big fan....of himself.

Don't quote him...don't respond to him....he'll follow you everywhere.

hahaha

[theograce]

Everyone seems really angry. We all need to hug

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qeTnB0be_ ... YW1lIDc%3D

[SameOldBlues]

Everyone seems really angry. We all need to hug

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qeTnB0be_ ... YW1lIDc%3D

If there was ever any doubt before, this post conclusively proves beyond a shadow of a doubt…that you’re not a Blues fan, which is fine and dandy, I just dont understand the charade of pretending to be one.

[theograce]

Everyone seems really angry. We all need to hug

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qeTnB0be_ ... YW1lIDc%3D

If there was ever any doubt before, this post conclusively proves beyond a shadow of a doubt…that you’re not a Blues fan, which is fine and dandy, I just dont understand the charade of pretending to be one.

Proves it how? Everyone is upset over one of the biggest chokes in playoff history

Don’t be afraid of it. Embrace it

[BudOnTap]

Everyone seems really angry. We all need to hug

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qeTnB0be_ ... YW1lIDc%3D

If there was ever any doubt before, this post conclusively proves beyond a shadow of a doubt…that you’re not a Blues fan, which is fine and dandy, I just dont understand the charade of pretending to be one.

Proves it how? Everyone is upset over one of the biggest chokes in playoff history

Don’t be afraid of it. Embrace it

No one is upset about it, or dwelling on it. Blues fans are jazzed about next season. Looking forward to it. Of course you’re being a banned idiot of the highest caliber, per usual, because you’re hurt the bandwagon team you’ve chosen the past two years failed again to Matt Tkachuck. Love it.

[dhsux]

If there was ever any doubt before, this post conclusively proves beyond a shadow of a doubt…that you’re not a Blues fan, which is fine and dandy, I just dont understand the charade of pretending to be one.

He's here for himself. He's no Blues fan.

He's been banned multiple times and has to come back here on the internet to have any kind of life.

Can you imagine returning to a place that banned you? Pretty pitiful.

[MiamiLaw]

[Friedman] In the new CBA they may make it so your roster that goes on the ice must be cap compliant; you can have whatever you want on your roster but your actual lineup must be under the cap

It's about f$%^in time

[Aesa]

[Friedman] In the new CBA they may make it so your roster that goes on the ice must be cap compliant; you can have whatever you want on your roster but your actual lineup must be under the cap

It's about f$%^in time

True dat!