Thanks dad...You are capable of getting your point across without being condescending.rockondlouie wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 10:40 am
Explain nothing, do you own homework.
Open your eye's and try to keep up.
Tink Hence
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: Tink Hence
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 9581
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Tink Hence
Not even close, you're probably older than me...............back to IGNORE since you can't discuss baseball w/o getting personal so save your replies to me.PadsFS07 wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 14:26 pmThanks dad...You are capable of getting your point across without being condescending.rockondlouie wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 10:40 am
Explain nothing, do you own homework.
Open your eye's and try to keep up.
Re: Tink Hence
I'd like to come back to this and put ages on his years of pitching and do some comparisons.rockondlouie wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 10:40 am 2021
8 IP
2022
60 2/3 IP that includes the AZFL
2023
96 IP
2024
79 2/3 IP
2025
4 1/3 IP
Does that look like a future starters inning to you?
2021 - Age 18 - 8 IP
2022 - Age 19 - 64 2/3 IP (added playoffs)
2023 - Age 20 - 99 1/3 IP (added spring training)
2024 - Age 21 - 83 2/3 IP (added spring training)
Now compare to former Card pitching prospects (these include college/spring/playoffs/afl as well)
Siegrist:
18 - 47 2/3
19 - 28
20 - 53 2/3
21 - 107 1/3
22 - 106 2/3
23 - 73 1/3 --> MLB debut
Rosenthal:
19 - 58
20 - 34
21 - 135 1/3
22 - 140 1/3 --> MLB debut
Miller:
18 - 80
19 - 104 1/3
20 - 139 1/3
21 - 153 2/3
22 - 174 1/3
Martinez:
18 - 59
19 - 84 2/3
20 - 115 2/3
21 - 120 2/3 --> ML debut
Reyes:
18 - 58 1/3
19 - 109 1/3
20 - 101 1/3
21 - 111 1/3 --> MLB debut
Flaherty:
18 - 111 1/3
19 - 102
20 - 135
21 - 177 --> MLB debut
Re: Tink Hence
Those numbers don't bode well since he does compare most favorably to Siegrist and Rosenthal.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 726
- Joined: 23 May 2024 19:52 pm
Re: Tink Hence
Have you not figured out this place yet? This board suffers from a Pujols syndrome. If the player does not have immediate success in the role, it’s a failed player with no chance to develop. Then when they have success elsewhere on a team which allows them to work though failure, those same people blast the organization for given up on the player too quickly.
This board has no patience to let a prospect develop. It has to be immediate success Pujols style.
Re: Tink Hence
It’s worth finding out for sure. I don’t see the rush either.Stlcardsblues wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 16:30 pmThe silly thing is we all relatively agree about
Have you not figured out this place yet? This board suffers from a Pujols syndrome. If the player does not have immediate success in the role, it’s a failed player with no chance to develop. Then when they have success elsewhere on a team which allows them to work though failure, those same people blast the organization for given up on the player too quickly.
This board has no patience to let a prospect develop. It has to be immediate success Pujols style.
Re: Tink Hence
He’d’ve been lights out against Velvet Freeze.Pink Freud wrote: ↑03 Jun 2025 10:21 am I recall in the mid-80s Todd Worrell was a starting pitcher in the minors, but had a nasty habit of getting rocked his second and third time around the lineup. A wise pitching coach moved him to closer, and a star was born (except when he faced Howard Johnson).
Re: Tink Hence
He could make it up to the Big leagues in September as a RP possibly and in the offseason go play in the Arizona Fall League