No question that you can never keep them all.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑24 May 2025 09:28 amYou mean like how Colorado and Buffalo gave up on ROR for him to win a Cup as soon as he played for the Blues?a smell of green grass wrote: ↑23 May 2025 22:48 pmBarbashev, and now Mikkola. I get a real charge out of seeing our draft assets making key contributions on Cup teams. I'm just happy that we at least got peanuts in return for both of them. That Army sure drafts well.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑23 May 2025 14:30 pmCome on now. That’s a bit of revisionist history there IMO. The Blues re-signed Leddy after the 2021-22 season. A season in which they went 49-22-11. Leddy was signed to be in our top-4. Mikkola was the #6-7 guy that year. Are you really saying the Blues should’ve inserted Mikkola into the top-4 and just seen what happens? Assume he’d be able to handle that role even though he’d shown no ability to do so to date?Lone_Ranger wrote: ↑23 May 2025 14:04 pmBig miss is right. We had Mikkola and he was playing well but Army went out and got Leddy instead of trusting the kid.
Army does have a bad habit of locking up cap space on so called "economically priced veteran players" but man sometimes you got to put trust in the kids. And right here was a perfect example. Mikkola should be a Blue.
While I’ll agree with the overarching sentiment about signing vets like Leddy and Scandella, that didn’t make guys like Mikkola the right choice at the time. My argument was they they should’ve gotten someone better than Scandy or Leddy…but it wasn’t Mikkola. At least not in 2020 when they signed Scandy or in 2022 when they signed Leddy.
Mikkola didn’t take a step until he signed with Florida. It would sure be nice to still have him but you can’t keep everyone. He was a pending UFA and hadn’t shown much by that point. He bloomed later. It happens sometimes. But out of all of Army’s moves, him moving Mikkola as a pending UFA isn’t one I shake my head at.
This year. Instead of guessing what prospects we will add to the prospect pipleline, let's all guess which prospect will be let go by Army, and make it to the Cup Finals on some other team.
Or how LA and Philly gave up on Schenn?
Or how Toronto developed Bozak for 9 years just to see him join the Blues and win a Cup the first year he wasn’t in Toronto?
Or is it Steener Leafs fans are still mad they just gave to us?
I’m sure Pittsburgh is still lamenting not keeping Sunny.
Players change teams, bud. And you can’t keep them all. Especially when they reach UFA status (like both Barbashev and Mikkola did). Every team can play the “wish we had kept them” game.
My question is why is that we find ourselves needing young defenseman... and Mikkola is skating for a Cup in Florida.
Meanwhile, we are hiring Suter and Fowler and MORE...
The players that we KEPT when we left Mikkola go ARE OUT OF HOCKEY...
Why is that we find ourselves needing a 200 ft Forward... and Barbashev is skating for a Cup in Vegas.
Meanwhile, we are paying the guy that last touched the puck in Game 7 for 7 more years, wondering how many more Game 7s he can blow up.
We shouldn't gloss over Army's apparent mistakes with blanket statements such as "every GM does it". As always, the details and circumstances matter. Ask yourself if the players are as sign that we are gaining ground by making wise decisions, or losing ground and making poor decisions.